Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 31 Dec 2011 (Saturday) 14:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

family portrait large printing

 
mattymx
Goldmember
Avatar
1,181 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 757
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Big Bear, Ca.
     
Dec 31, 2011 14:49 |  #1

Hey all. Happy New Year!
I had a photo shoot with a family on the slopes yesterday. Here is the shot that they would like a 20x30 thin wrap print of. Most of the time I shoot sports like skiing and football, but they asked me to shoot their family portrait on the slopes.

This was shot with my 7D and 24-105L. The finished (as of now) image was processed in PS CS5 and the final sharpening was USM at 200%, 1.0 pixel, 0 threshold. Final file size is 11.8 megs.

Anything you all think I need to do before it goes to print? The client told me they have quite a few friends that want to have a session with me and I just want this to turn out perfectly. Thanks!

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Motion Picture Lighting Tech
Canon EOS R6II
EF 70-200 F2.8 III L
EF 85 F1.4 L
EF 100-400 II L
EF 17-40 F4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Redcrown
Senior Member
351 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Dec 2008
     
Jan 01, 2012 11:13 |  #2

The "day-glo" colors in the girls' vests are way out of gamut for printing. They will probably print as a solid blob of color with no detail. Plus, they are the brightest part of the image so they become the primary focus of the image. Much brighter than the faces, which should be the primary focus.

Assuming you have the original raw, I'd go back and try to "fix" those colors. Try to selectively lower the saturation and brightness.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Daship
Senior Member
765 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 01, 2012 11:41 |  #3

I agree about the vest colors, and I think you may have over done the sharpening, the people look cut and paste to me. Their teeth look overly bright white as well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Player9
Senior Member
658 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Jan 01, 2012 12:36 |  #4

agree with the last post.
too much sharpening applied.


RP, 60D, RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS, RF 35mm f/1.8 IS, RF 50mm f/1.8, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, EF-S 18-135mm 3.5-5.6 IS, EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, EF 28mm f/1.8, EF 50mm f/1.8, EF-S 60mm f/2.8 macro, EF 85mm f/1.8, El-100, 430ex, 220ex, Alien Bee B400 (2), Alien Bee B800 (2)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattymx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,181 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 757
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Big Bear, Ca.
     
Jan 01, 2012 12:41 |  #5

Player9 wrote in post #13629559 (external link)
agree with the last post.
too much sharpening applied.

For output? Remember the post states there is going to be a 20x30 print of this image. Thanks for the help guys. I'll try again to lower the glowing.


Motion Picture Lighting Tech
Canon EOS R6II
EF 70-200 F2.8 III L
EF 85 F1.4 L
EF 100-400 II L
EF 17-40 F4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Jan 01, 2012 14:02 as a reply to  @ mattymx's post |  #6

You need to mute the colors in those vests. Your eyes always get drawn to the brightest area of an image and those vests certainly are that. Other than that I like the image. As far as sharpening goes you are probably fine. I always apply higher levels of sharpening for images going out for printing. To say there is too much sharpening is something that cannot be substantiated online as we cannot see how the full image looks and one that has had this level of sharpening applied and then downsized for display here doesn't give us a true representation. If it looks good on your end for the place that you send to print then you are good to go.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 01, 2012 14:47 |  #7

Hey, nice looking family!

For future reference, I'd put some effort into balancing your lighting for this type of thing. I'd lower the power of your flash until the "look" of the subjects wasn't quite as bright. As it is, not just the vests but the family as a whole is a bit "bright", making it look, well, a bit too much. A lower-power flash could help them to blend together with the background more.

But, I'd agree to pull back the colors of the vests and then I'll bet the family will be happy!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattymx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,181 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 757
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Big Bear, Ca.
     
Jan 01, 2012 15:14 |  #8

Here is my newest edit. What do you guys think? Thanks for the help. I really appreciate it.

IMAGE: http://www.mattymx.com/People/Shelly/i-Mq56Jm2/0/XL/IMG2176-3-XL.jpg

Motion Picture Lighting Tech
Canon EOS R6II
EF 70-200 F2.8 III L
EF 85 F1.4 L
EF 100-400 II L
EF 17-40 F4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 01, 2012 15:29 |  #9

A bit better -- the problem is that the green and the red/pink areas are pretty well clipped, at least in what we see.

Did you by chance shoot this in Raw? If so, you could upload the Raw file to a site such as YouSendIt.com. You could put your email address as the Recipient. They email you a notification with a link to the file, which you could post here, and we could download the Raw file and mess with it.

I mention that because the Raw file would have more data to "play with", and part of that is having an undefined "color space" where the sRGB color space hasn't been "cooked in" to the image. That gives more latitude in trying to "tame" colors which are too bright/saturated for the sRGB space.

If you shot this in jpeg, well, that's different, let us know which way you can go!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattymx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,181 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 757
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Big Bear, Ca.
     
Jan 01, 2012 15:39 |  #10

It was jpeg. Never shoot much raw, but I should have in this case. I'm mostly an action shooter. Those shots come more natural to me than portraits. Those day glow colors really make it tough.


Motion Picture Lighting Tech
Canon EOS R6II
EF 70-200 F2.8 III L
EF 85 F1.4 L
EF 100-400 II L
EF 17-40 F4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 01, 2012 15:49 |  #11

mattymx wrote in post #13630228 (external link)
It was jpeg. Never shoot much raw, but I should have in this case. I'm mostly an action shooter. Those shots come more natural to me than portraits. Those day glow colors really make it tough.

Ah, OK, well, you do what you can with jpeg, it just would have been nice to see how much we could squeeze out of a Raw file:)! I tried messing with the shot in Lightroom but too much was, well, too much, and I'm not a Photoshop retouching expert...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wallace ­ River
" ...a bit of a pervy voyeur "
Avatar
12,777 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 4273
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Wallace, Nova Scotia
     
Jan 01, 2012 16:01 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #12

You guys are being over critical, methinks. If the girls didn't want to look bright they wouldn't have picked those colors for their vests in the first place. I think the last verSion is terrific, good job. Don't fuss too much over it, they will absolutely love it.


IAN - Living life on the shores of the Wallace River in northern Nova Scotia, Canada :
Canon 1D4, 1D-X, 1D-X II, almost enough glass.
My Flickr (external link).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 01, 2012 16:07 |  #13

Wallace River wrote in post #13630316 (external link)
You guys are being over critical, methinks. If the girls didn't want to look bright they wouldn't have picked those colors for their vests in the first place. I think the last verSion is terrific, good job. Don't fuss too much over it, they will absolutely love it.

I'm not trying to be critical -- like I said I think the family will like it. But for the future shots like this, bringing down the power of the flash and shooting in Raw will help, in my opinion. There's nothing wrong with having bright colors, of course, but you don't need to have them totally clipped, there are ways around that...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wallace ­ River
" ...a bit of a pervy voyeur "
Avatar
12,777 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 4273
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Wallace, Nova Scotia
     
Jan 01, 2012 16:12 |  #14

tonylong wrote in post #13630340 (external link)
I'm not trying to be critical -- like I said I think the family will like it. But for the future shots like this, bringing down the power of the flash and shooting in Raw will help, in my opinion. There's nothing wrong with having bright colors, of course, but you don't need to have them totally clipped, there are ways around that...

Gotcha. Agreed for future efforts. Just sayin ....;)


IAN - Living life on the shores of the Wallace River in northern Nova Scotia, Canada :
Canon 1D4, 1D-X, 1D-X II, almost enough glass.
My Flickr (external link).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattymx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,181 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 757
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Big Bear, Ca.
     
Jan 01, 2012 16:18 |  #15

Thanks Ian. I appreciate the comment and I do hope they love the way it turns out. The comments I was looking for, I indeed found. I knew there was an issue with the day glow POP and some other little issues and with everyone that chimed in, gave me an extra set of eyes to help with the edit.

I'm thankful for all comments and that Tony chimed in. I love his work and his critique is welcomed. I would rather someone be slightly over critical in situations like this. It is a lot more constructive than the old "Nice shot" or "That is terrible" comments. I am still going to work on this and I welcome any and all feedback. I really appreciate everyones help.


Motion Picture Lighting Tech
Canon EOS R6II
EF 70-200 F2.8 III L
EF 85 F1.4 L
EF 100-400 II L
EF 17-40 F4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,689 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
family portrait large printing
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1602 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.