Kit or not to kit? lol. How's the 24-105L?
Jan 04, 2012 20:31 | #31 |
gagakango Member 166 posts Joined May 2008 Location: west of edmonton alberta More info | Jan 04, 2012 20:52 | #32 24-105 is great, people wonder to have that or the 24-70 Eos m w/kit zoom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TooManyShots Cream of the Crop 10,203 posts Likes: 532 Joined Jan 2008 Location: NYC More info | Permanent banHold out for the 5dmark4..... One Imaging Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 04, 2012 21:05 | #34 gagakango wrote in post #13648248 24-105 is great, people wonder to have that or the 24-70 I'm going to miss my 17-55... 2.8 and IS. Very handy lens. That's what has me torn between the 24-70 and the 24-105 (2.8 VS IS, and the obvious range difference). TooManyShots wrote in post #13648262 Hold out for the 5dmark4..... Thanks, will do.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CactusJuice Senior Member 853 posts Joined Jan 2010 More info | Jan 04, 2012 21:11 | #35 Definitely wait for the 5D3. In the meantime, make some money. Invest your $3,500. Put half in Laudus Growth Investors US Large Cap (LGILX) and the other half in Conoco Phllips (COP). You probably won't get a double but the appreciation will pay for a good chunk of the 5D3 when you eventually buy it during the after Christmas sale of January 2013.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben.tite Member 81 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Guildford, UK More info | Jan 05, 2012 05:52 | #36 Mk II is amazing...get it now, you won't regret it. You could be waiting a long time for the Mk III, which is time wasted and you could have enjoyed that Mk II so so much Back: Canon 5D MK II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lowner "I'm the original idiot" 12,924 posts Likes: 18 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Salisbury, UK. More info | Jan 05, 2012 07:55 | #37 The advise to invest in the stock market is presumably tongue in cheek? Rather than making anything this year if we see the promised "double dip" deflation you might lose some. Richard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2012 10:55 | #38 amd is the best wrote in post #13648318 I'm going to miss my 17-55... 2.8 and IS. Very handy lens. That's what has me torn between the 24-70 and the 24-105 (2.8 VS IS, and the obvious range difference).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1547 guests, 169 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||