Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 05 Jan 2012 (Thursday) 07:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tset (Apologies!)

 
mikey1967
Senior Member
319 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 05, 2012 07:35 |  #1

Too heavy with the HDR?

http://img100.imagesha​ck.us …8/fishingboat2f​orpotn.jpg (external link)

Oversized image changed to link. POTN Maxc. image size is no more than 1024 pixels/side.

Jon




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ramon-uk
Senior Member
833 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Likes: 365
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Rochester UK
     
Jan 05, 2012 07:59 |  #2

Over saturated, over sharpened, generally over processed.

It looks as though you've too much noise reduction and then tried to rescue it by increasing the sharpness and saturation.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Jan 05, 2012 08:09 |  #3

My view of HDR is to just adjust curves (potentially merging multiple exposures because of noise issues) to get a photo where both details in the highlights and in the shadows can be seen.

But that would basically represent a compression of a large dynamic range into the lesser dynamic range of the monitor or a printer. The above looks the reverse - a magnification of contrast and color saturation. The problem is that it ends up as a very hard image. You definitely get an impact. But more like a sledgehammer. Less is often more. A more subtle image can be very selling by feeling calm and comforting to look at.


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikey1967
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
319 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 05, 2012 08:09 |  #4

Cheers Ramon!

Ramon-uk wrote in post #13650368 (external link)
Over saturated, over sharpened, generally over processed.

It looks as though you've too much noise reduction and then tried to rescue it by increasing the sharpness and saturation.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikey1967
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
319 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 05, 2012 08:10 |  #5

Don't remember doing any sharpening on it

Ramon-uk wrote in post #13650368 (external link)
Over saturated, over sharpened, generally over processed.

It looks as though you've too much noise reduction and then tried to rescue it by increasing the sharpness and saturation.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikey1967
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
319 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 05, 2012 08:11 |  #6

Thank you for that

pwm2 wrote in post #13650413 (external link)
My view of HDR is to just adjust curves (potentially merging multiple exposures because of noise issues) to get a photo where both details in the highlights and in the shadows can be seen.

But that would basically represent a compression of a large dynamic range into the lesser dynamic range of the monitor or a printer. The above looks the reverse - a magnification of contrast and color saturation. The problem is that it ends up as a very hard image. You definitely get an impact. But more like a sledgehammer. Less is often more. A more subtle image can be very selling by feeling calm and comforting to look at.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
Goldmember
3,983 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 545
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 06, 2012 08:12 |  #7

Is this a single-exposure HDR from adjusted RAW?
It looks good to me. I don't think it's overdone.


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikey1967
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
319 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 06, 2012 08:18 |  #8

Thanks Qbx! It's a single exposure - jpg with a little Topaz Labs Adjust 4 pp

Mike

Qbx wrote in post #13656416 (external link)
Is this a single-exposure HDR from adjusted RAW?
It looks good to me. I don't think it's overdone.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ramon-uk
Senior Member
833 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Likes: 365
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Rochester UK
     
Jan 06, 2012 10:02 |  #9

Could you post the original unprocessed shot so that we can see what you've done to it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikey1967
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
319 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 06, 2012 10:41 |  #10

Will do - just give me 10 minutes

Ramon-uk wrote in post #13656941 (external link)
Could you post the original unprocessed shot so that we can see what you've done to it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikey1967
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
319 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 06, 2012 11:02 |  #11

Not original file as it came out of the camera but close to the original image

Ramon-uk wrote in post #13656941 (external link)
Could you post the original unprocessed shot so that we can see what you've done to it.

IMAGE: http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/9458/28426702.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,340 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Tset (Apologies!)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
704 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.