Too heavy with the HDR?
http://img100.imageshack.us …8/fishingboat2forpotn.jpg![]()
Oversized image changed to link. POTN Maxc. image size is no more than 1024 pixels/side.
Jon
mikey1967 Senior Member 319 posts Joined Sep 2007 More info | Jan 05, 2012 07:35 | #1 Too heavy with the HDR?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2012 07:59 | #2 Over saturated, over sharpened, generally over processed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pwm2 "Sorry for being a noob" 8,626 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2007 Location: Sweden More info | Jan 05, 2012 08:09 | #3 My view of HDR is to just adjust curves (potentially merging multiple exposures because of noise issues) to get a photo where both details in the highlights and in the shadows can be seen. 5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2012 08:09 | #4 Cheers Ramon! Ramon-uk wrote in post #13650368 Over saturated, over sharpened, generally over processed. It looks as though you've too much noise reduction and then tried to rescue it by increasing the sharpness and saturation.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2012 08:10 | #5 Don't remember doing any sharpening on it Ramon-uk wrote in post #13650368 Over saturated, over sharpened, generally over processed. It looks as though you've too much noise reduction and then tried to rescue it by increasing the sharpness and saturation.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2012 08:11 | #6 Thank you for that pwm2 wrote in post #13650413 My view of HDR is to just adjust curves (potentially merging multiple exposures because of noise issues) to get a photo where both details in the highlights and in the shadows can be seen. But that would basically represent a compression of a large dynamic range into the lesser dynamic range of the monitor or a printer. The above looks the reverse - a magnification of contrast and color saturation. The problem is that it ends up as a very hard image. You definitely get an impact. But more like a sledgehammer. Less is often more. A more subtle image can be very selling by feeling calm and comforting to look at.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 06, 2012 08:12 | #7 Is this a single-exposure HDR from adjusted RAW? -- Image Editing OK --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 06, 2012 08:18 | #8 Thanks Qbx! It's a single exposure - jpg with a little Topaz Labs Adjust 4 pp Qbx wrote in post #13656416 Is this a single-exposure HDR from adjusted RAW? It looks good to me. I don't think it's overdone.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 06, 2012 10:02 | #9 Could you post the original unprocessed shot so that we can see what you've done to it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 06, 2012 10:41 | #10 Will do - just give me 10 minutes Ramon-uk wrote in post #13656941 Could you post the original unprocessed shot so that we can see what you've done to it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 06, 2012 11:02 | #11 Not original file as it came out of the camera but close to the original image Ramon-uk wrote in post #13656941 Could you post the original unprocessed shot so that we can see what you've done to it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 704 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||