Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 05 Jan 2012 (Thursday) 08:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

if you had to make a Choice...

 
Foil
Member
140 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Germany
     
Jan 05, 2012 08:35 |  #1

would you Pick a 16-35mm2.8 II for a 1DIV or a 10-22mm for a 7D for indoor,landscape.i`d like to hear your opinions,i always opt for EF lenses should i go full frame ,the Sigma 12-24 mm and canon 8-15mm are offlimits.
Thank You.


Still learning Day by Day.Canon1D IV,7D Gripped,40D Gripped,350D,PENTACON SIX & CZJ Biometar 80 2.8 ,10-22mm,24-70 2.8, 85 1.8,50 1.4,50 1.8,100 2.8, 70-200 2.8,100-400mm, 300 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michael1984
Senior Member
641 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Harrisburg, PA
     
Jan 05, 2012 08:37 |  #2

with the crop sensor you will want the 10-22mm to shoot that wide




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Jan 05, 2012 08:42 as a reply to  @ Michael1984's post |  #3

I'd take the Mk IV/16-35 II..that would mean i have a Mk IV...Yippeee!!! :D


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Foil
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
140 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Germany
     
Jan 05, 2012 08:59 |  #4

Thanks Micheal1984,you are right, but i keep eyeing the 16-35mm,for some time now,i usually pass by the Camera Shop with a Coffee and Spend a few minutes of Solitude in front of the Shelf,today i came without a Coffee and got one free from the Boss saying"same procedure as every Day Please"

1Tanker wrote in post #13650575 (external link)
I'd take the Mk IV/16-35 II..that would mean i have a Mk IV...Yippeee!!! :D

NICE TRY :)


Still learning Day by Day.Canon1D IV,7D Gripped,40D Gripped,350D,PENTACON SIX & CZJ Biometar 80 2.8 ,10-22mm,24-70 2.8, 85 1.8,50 1.4,50 1.8,100 2.8, 70-200 2.8,100-400mm, 300 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 05, 2012 09:25 |  #5

any chance you'd use either one outside in bad weather?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dfbovey
Goldmember
1,602 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Mar 2011
     
Jan 05, 2012 09:26 |  #6

Michael1984 wrote in post #13650541 (external link)
with the crop sensor you will want the 10-22mm to shoot that wide

I agree. Love this lens.

If the OP ever goes FF, just sell it.


Flickr (external link)
Canon 1D markIV - Canon 1D markIII - Canon 6D
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS - Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L - Canon EF 500mm f/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
baita83
Member
Avatar
217 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jan 05, 2012 09:29 as a reply to  @ rick_reno's post |  #7

I have never shot with a 16-35 but I have shot with the 17-40 and it wasn't wide enough so I just recently purchased the 10-22 and it is amazing I would recommend the 10-22 unless you are planning on moving to FF in the near future


gear:5D mark III,T3i,EF 24-105L, EF 100mm , 300mm f4,50mm 1.8
https://www.facebook.c​om/abwildlife (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Foil
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
140 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Germany
     
Jan 05, 2012 09:30 |  #8

rick_reno wrote in post #13650762 (external link)
any chance you'd use either one outside in bad weather?

yes there is a chance of bad weather but i can take care of that;)


Still learning Day by Day.Canon1D IV,7D Gripped,40D Gripped,350D,PENTACON SIX & CZJ Biometar 80 2.8 ,10-22mm,24-70 2.8, 85 1.8,50 1.4,50 1.8,100 2.8, 70-200 2.8,100-400mm, 300 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Jan 05, 2012 10:19 |  #9

The OP appears to have BOTH cameras, already ;)

I only have a 7D, right now, but given the choice I think I'd go for the 16-35, simply because I'm interested in the wider, constant aperture and its potential for an astro lens. I love my 10-22 on the 7D, but... :)


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 05, 2012 10:20 |  #10

I'd choose the 16-35.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Jan 05, 2012 12:01 as a reply to  @ rick_reno's post |  #11

This isn't an easy one, really. For indoor shots, the 16-35 coupled with the Mk IV's great high ISO performance, fits the bill(though not as wide). For pano's, the 10-22's much better distortion control would be better. Then, also consider the expensive 82mm filters for the L lens :confused:..i think the 10-22 would be the more versatile choice..IMO.


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
absplastic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,643 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jan 05, 2012 13:20 |  #12

It's a tough call because the 16-35 would be nice in the event of the full-frame upgrade, but it's not as wide on the 1d as the 10-22 is on the 7D. Outdoors there are times when my 10-22 feels too wide, but indoors I find myself wishing it could go just a bit wider. I'd go with the 10-22 on the 7D right now for your current needs, and trade up if you end up going full frame.


5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
SL1, 10-18 STM, 18-55 STM, 40 STM, 50 STM
My (mostly) Fashion and Portraiture Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link) (NSFW)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GOLFCRAZY
Member
34 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 05, 2012 16:03 |  #13

Foil wrote in post #13650530 (external link)
would you Pick a 16-35mm2.8 II for a 1DIV or a 10-22mm for a 7D for indoor,landscape.i`d like to hear your opinions,i always opt for EF lenses should i go full frame ,the Sigma 12-24 mm and canon 8-15mm are offlimits.
Thank You.


Your FOV is the same on these two, is it not? 10-22 on a crop vs. 16-35 on ff. He has both crop and ff cameras, if I am reading his sig right. I would go with the 16-35 if budget is not a concern.

John




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Jan 05, 2012 16:46 |  #14

GOLFCRAZY wrote in post #13652955 (external link)
Your FOV is the same on these two, is it not? 10-22 on a crop vs. 16-35 on ff. He has both crop and ff cameras, if I am reading his sig right. I would go with the 16-35 if budget is not a concern.

John

I think you missed the same thing I did, originally...the 1D MkIV is NOT a FF body...it's a 1.3x crop. So, the 16-35 + MkIV would not be as wide as the 7D + 10-22.

I think I'd still opt for the 16-35, myself; but, if UWA is the goal, then the 7D + 10-22 would have to be the answer there.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tapeman
Sliced Bread
Avatar
3,723 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Twin Cities
     
Jan 05, 2012 18:35 |  #15

I used my 16-35 a lot on my !D2 but use it less now that I also have a full frame body. (My 24-105 is on my 5D2 most of the time.) When I need wider then the 16-35 comes out, but not usually on my 1D4.


Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
Gitzo 1228, 1275, 1558, Lensbaby 3G. Epson 3880, Bags that match my shoes.:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,174 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
if you had to make a Choice...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1191 guests, 165 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.