Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
Thread started 05 Jan 2012 (Thursday) 12:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Little Zoë

 
Curbstone
Member
53 posts
Joined Jun 2010
     
Jan 05, 2012 12:55 |  #1

Hi All,

Here's a couple photos of a shoot I had recently, little Zoë! :D

1.

IMAGE: http://i42.tinypic.com/xnw38p.jpg

2.
IMAGE: http://i44.tinypic.com/6ymjar.jpg

3.
IMAGE: http://i39.tinypic.com/t87ldt.jpg

Reg,

Philippe

Website:
philippegovaerts.com (external link)
Please support and Like our Portrait-MAG FB page, we put photographer's work in the spotlight! http://www.facebook.co​m/PortraitM (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 05, 2012 19:16 |  #2

nice shots, 2 looks a little washed out. not sure why.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curbstone
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
53 posts
Joined Jun 2010
     
Jan 06, 2012 02:24 |  #3

rick_reno wrote in post #13653864 (external link)
nice shots, 2 looks a little washed out. not sure why.

Post processing... :o


Website:
philippegovaerts.com (external link)
Please support and Like our Portrait-MAG FB page, we put photographer's work in the spotlight! http://www.facebook.co​m/PortraitM (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SORENNA
Junior Member
Avatar
27 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 06, 2012 03:06 |  #4

I Loved the second one...amazing but low quality though..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sam
Goldmember
Avatar
4,044 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 50
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Northern California
     
Jan 06, 2012 11:59 |  #5

I like the second shot. Everything looks intentional to me, and not what I would call low quality. Low contrast but the quality looks good.

I'm not looking for an internet argument, just wanted to put another opinion out there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,080 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Little Zoë
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1297 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.