Shot my brother at night, got some cool shots. all critiques welcome.
I was mainly trying to have fun and work on using 2 lights in a shot.
oceanbeast Senior Member 494 posts Joined Jul 2010 More info | Jan 06, 2012 23:38 | #1 |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Jan 07, 2012 09:49 | #2 I like the first one, but would have had someone hold a white 30" X 40" art board to his right to try to bounce some fill into the shadows on his face. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 07, 2012 10:07 | #3 both are very well received comments. these are the details that i miss because i dont know what im doing wrong or don't know that they can be corrected. since i usually shoot by myself unassisted i really need to invest in another small light for fill and maybe some grip equipment to hold stuff for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WallaceRiver " ...a bit of a pervy voyeur " More info | I think Frank's comments are dead on. But the important thing here is that you're out there trying new things. Try more! And then more! Soon it'll all be coming natural to you. IAN - Living life on the shores of the Wallace River in northern Nova Scotia, Canada :
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stillinamerica Goldmember 1,275 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Alabama More info | Jan 07, 2012 12:12 | #5 The first one looks flat to me. Like a cardboard cut out? Mayb angle the front light more to camera left? looks to me that it was close to being straight on. [CENTER]My Facebook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 07, 2012 15:08 | #6 I honestly don't feel the first one is flat at all. The light was camera left, beauty dish from above
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drvnbysound Goldmember 3,316 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Jan 07, 2012 21:04 | #7 I think that cutout look comes from the highlight (white outline) being prominent around the entirety of the subject. I didn't get that impression at first, but the more I look at it... I started to see it that way as well. I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
maybe i don't understand correctly, i see plenty of shadows in the first one. maybe i dont understand what a flat picture is.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drvnbysound Goldmember 3,316 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Jan 07, 2012 21:55 | #9 I didn't get the impression that the image was flat... I saw the shadows on the left side of the face (camera right) as well as the right hand (camera left). However, I suppose the jacket appears flat; I think it is underexposed and detail has been lost in it, making it look 1-dimensional. I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1096 guests, 178 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||