Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 12 Jan 2012 (Thursday) 19:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Same shot done two ways.

 
Cucamonga ­ Al
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: SoCal
     
Jan 12, 2012 19:26 |  #1

I captured this one last year when I was in Joshua Tree. Thought I would give the original a little different spin and run it through a Topaz effect called Buz Sim. C & C always encouraged and respected. Thanks.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Have plenty of Canons, enough ammo, enough to blow 'em to "L". Now, I just have to learn to aim.

www.flickr.com/photos/​albert_l_lipsey (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Jan 12, 2012 19:29 |  #2

I love the original. The second, not so much.

I'd be curious to see if you could merge the two and selectively mask out various sections. It might give it a different spin without being in your face. Something a bit different.

Anyways, really like the first shot.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Norman ­ B
Senior Member
352 posts
Joined Nov 2011
     
Jan 12, 2012 19:38 |  #3

Twins....very nice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdaddyrabbit
Goldmember
Avatar
1,712 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 12, 2012 19:45 |  #4

I love the original very much but the second one falls under my opinion as more like a art painting or paint effect. I have found that such effects are less favorable for a lot of people. It only appeals to the person who has created it. I have posted a couple of photos here that had effects in which I was pleased with and very few folks found them as pleasing as I did. Again the first one is priceless.


Website (external link)

CANON

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tewlman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,334 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Danville, Ky
     
Jan 12, 2012 19:48 |  #5

definitely the the first one.


My Gear My Flickr (external link)
some feedback
Like my photos? Then "like" my Facebook page! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digger58
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2007
Location: The base of the Canadian Rockies
     
Jan 12, 2012 22:24 |  #6

First one without a doubt


5D mkii
50D
7D
A bunch of glass and very limited knowledge

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 12, 2012 22:57 |  #7

i like the rocks in the 2nd shot, but not the vegatation. if you could put them together, i'd like to see it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digidiva
Goldmember
Avatar
2,002 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Kent, UK
     
Jan 13, 2012 02:13 |  #8

First one for me too. Wonderful light.
I do like the second one, and I bet it would make a lovely large print.


BUYING A CANON DOESN'T MAKE YOU A PHOTOGRAPHER, IT MAKES YOU A CANON OWNER.

POST HOC, ERGO PROPTER HOC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Jan 13, 2012 02:21 |  #9

I like the first photograph...
I like the second painting...

They are, to me, mutually exclusive.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beano
Goldmember
Avatar
4,168 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: Berkshire. UK
     
Jan 13, 2012 02:30 |  #10

I prefer the over-all feel of the 2nd actually.. The light looks much nicer. ;)


Scott

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davtackett
Senior Member
Avatar
975 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Likes: 1028
Joined Jul 2010
Location: sterling Il
     
Jan 13, 2012 16:02 |  #11

I like the second one just fine.


Canon R5, RF 100-500, R5 with RF 24-105 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Daship
Senior Member
765 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 13, 2012 16:27 |  #12

both
;0




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cucamonga ­ Al
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: SoCal
     
Jan 13, 2012 16:56 |  #13

Thanks to all for your time and great comments. Al


Have plenty of Canons, enough ammo, enough to blow 'em to "L". Now, I just have to learn to aim.

www.flickr.com/photos/​albert_l_lipsey (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KoalaCowboy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,542 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 526
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Metro Denver, CO, USA
     
Jan 13, 2012 17:40 |  #14

First is better. Second with added effect blows the color spectrum out too much for my liking.

Nice shot though Al! :)


- -
Pete
Gripped 5D Mk III / 24-105 / 16-35 II / 70-200 II / 600EX-RT / LEE Filters / F-Stop backpacks / Gitzo GT3542LS / RRS BH-55
USKestrel Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon ­ Clemens
Goldmember
1,113 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Solvang, California
     
Jan 14, 2012 09:56 |  #15

The second has the chalky feel achieved with pastels. With the more powerful software available, photographers are less tied to the "image captured on film using a lens" and are encroaching on the areas that were once the domain of the artists using traditional techniques.


Canon 7D | 400L | 70-200L | 24-105L | Tokina 11-16
jonclemensphotography.​com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,523 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Same shot done two ways.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2744 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.