Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Jan 2012 (Monday) 03:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wide macro lenses

 
TweakMDS
Goldmember
Avatar
2,242 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Netherlands
     
Jan 16, 2012 03:46 |  #1

I am more or less researching the market for a "wide macro" lens.

I used to own the Tokina 35mm macro on my 40D, which is an absolutely stunning lens. The more serious macro work I normally do with my 100mm macro (often with 36mm tube), but I really like the wider option for macro, since it gives a perspective that you don't often see.

The lenses that come to mind are the Sigma 24mm 1.8 (which is only 1:2.7 but still an impressive magnification for such a wide lens), but it's got quite a lot of disadvantages: "being a Sigma", heavy, awkward AF/MF switch, poor AF compared to what I'm used to - though not too important for macro.
For a lens like that I'd ideally want it to be good enough to also replace my Canon 28mm 1.8 - but it's not...

Another (less wide) option could be the Canon 50mm compact macro, or the Zeiss 50mm f/2 macro, both will do 1:2, or the Sigma 50mm f/2.8.

It seems there's a few decent 50mm options, but I'd really like to focus my attention around the 35mm length. However, it seems there's not a whole lot of options here...

Any recommendations or people with similar interests who've already found what I'm looking for?


Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
~Michael
Gear | Flickr (external link)
"My featured shots" (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,981 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Jan 16, 2012 05:07 |  #2

Hi Michael,

The reason you don't find any is because lenses shorter than 35 mm on a dslr tend to be retrofocus lenses of fairly long build construction compared to their FL. At close focus distances the WD with short lenses may become so short that in order to get an object in sharp focus, it would have to reside inside the lens due to this longer lens construction, and/or require extension tubes of thicknesses which don't exist (very thin ones).

For 35 mm lenses this isn't too bad yet, as one can often get away with a very simple construction, but adding more lens elements as required for shorter FLs makes this very difficult.

Furthermore, at larger AoVs, it gets exponentially more complex to create a well corrected macro lens which can also shoot at infinity, again adding to the complexity, and thereby the length of the lens.

Shorter macro and micro lenses do exist, but they tend to be specialist lenses, designed to work in macro mode only, often at very large magnifications, and they either need to be mounted to bellows or microscopes.

Personally, I have used a TS-E 24 (Mk I) for macro work, and that works quite well, but at maximum magnification with a 12 mm extension tube and a little tilt for optimum sharpness, the object already touches the front element.

I have attached an example, a close up of a nib on a fountain pen, at approximately 1:0.9, taken with a 400D at F/16, 200 iso, indirect flash, and some tilt in the direction of the nib slit. The pen point was almost touching the front element here, as in, less than 1 mm away from it. Just an experiment, and not a great pic, but it does show what is possible :D.

Kind regards, Wim


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TweakMDS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,242 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Netherlands
     
Jan 16, 2012 05:33 |  #3

Thanks for the reply and example, Wim. I've thought about using tubes on my 28 1.8 to get a bit closer (like 1:2 or so). However, what I'm mostly looking for is a versatile outdoor lens, where I can switch between landscape and semi macro. The Tokina 35mm was excellent for this, but it seems I'd have to delve into the 50mm's to get similar functionality on FF.
If it's possible I'd like to go a bit wider, but I haven't been able to find anything that can do this.


Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
~Michael
Gear | Flickr (external link)
"My featured shots" (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paddler4
Goldmember
Avatar
1,435 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jan 16, 2012 07:51 |  #4

If you get wide enough, even a typical short tube (my shortest is 12mm) won't work--you won't be able to obtain focus. I tried this last spring with my 15-85, but I no longer recall quite how wide I was able to go. Nikon makes an 8mm tube that allows you to go wider, but that doesn't do us Canon shooters any good.


Check out my photos at http://dkoretz.smugmug​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,981 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Jan 16, 2012 08:59 |  #5

TweakMDS wrote in post #13712039 (external link)
Thanks for the reply and example, Wim. I've thought about using tubes on my 28 1.8 to get a bit closer (like 1:2 or so). However, what I'm mostly looking for is a versatile outdoor lens, where I can switch between landscape and semi macro. The Tokina 35mm was excellent for this, but it seems I'd have to delve into the 50mm's to get similar functionality on FF.
If it's possible I'd like to go a bit wider, but I haven't been able to find anything that can do this.

On FF I would definitely go for a 50 mm in that case.

There is the excellent 50 F/2.5 CM indeed, the Sigma 50 F/2.8, and the Zeiss ZE 50 F/2.

On FF this even have a slightly wider AoV than the Tokina 35, and frankly, they are likely to be better too. The Tokina has some field curvature wide open, and is slightly less sharp at the edges and corners - speaking from personal experience here. The 50 CM is better in this regard.

I have never handled the Sigma 50 F/2.8 yet, and the Zeiss only for a few shots, so I can't really say anything about these two. From tests they appear to be slightly sharper than the Canon 50 F/2.5 CM, with the Zeiss probably being the best (but also the most expensive one).

Kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Jan 16, 2012 09:28 |  #6

Well I took a look down the Canon lens table I have to see what the closest-focusing short-focal-length lens options are. Remember (as I'm sure you're aware) the nearest equivalent to the Tokina 35mm on FF is the 50mm f/2.5 macro, which will give you almost exactly equivalent images in terms of angle, framing, and DOF. There is a "Life-size Converter" you can add to this lens to go from 0.5x up to 1x life size.

To go wider, I notice the MkII version of the TS-E 24mm focuses closer than the MkI, to give up to 0.34x without tubes. None of the current non-macro primes gets you very close; the best being the 35mm f/2 at 0.23x (this is still pretty close for most subjects). Looking at your gear list you already have two of the closer-focusing zooms in the 24-105L and 17-40L (0.23x and 0.24x respectively). Interestingly, the most extreme would seem to be the new 8-15mm fisheye zoom, which according to the table can give 0.39x - this must be almost in contact with the front element.

I hope this helps a bit.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZoneV
Goldmember
1,644 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 249
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Germany
     
Jan 16, 2012 12:18 |  #7

I made some macro images with my Samyang 14mm f/2.8. One time the bee was in contact with the front lens - but she didn“t careed.
To use shorter focal lenses with macro I DIY made a 8 mm thick manual extension tube (see homepage). I think I have to make a even shorter one.

Furthermore I made experiments with a relay lens system with a very short CCTV lens and a macro lens as relay lens - to get wide angel and big DOF. But the quality I got was not good enough.


DIY-Homepage (external link) - Image Gallery (external link) - Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TweakMDS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,242 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Netherlands
     
Jan 16, 2012 12:23 |  #8

I guess I'll keep an eye out for a nice used 50mm compact macro or sigma 50mm macro, whichever finds it's way to me first. The Zeiss is probably oh so nice, but I think it would become too pricey.

Very interesting tip on the 24TS-E MkII though, I didn't know it focused so close. Maybe one day, although I think that wouldn't really be the right lens for me to take into the field the same way I use the 35mm macro...


Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
~Michael
Gear | Flickr (external link)
"My featured shots" (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Jan 16, 2012 13:13 |  #9

I used a 12mm tube on a Canon EF 20/2.8 to make this shot:

IMAGE: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5023/5601543420_61d786650e_b.jpg
California poppies
EF 20mm f2.8 lens with 12mm extension tube. EOS-3 camera with Ektachrome film. Settings unrecorded.


I was trying to make some extreme close-ups that maintained a little more background detail than typically possible with a macro shot (and shooting slide film at the time, so wasn't able to use a very high ISO). I took a series of shots, in some cases the petals of the flowers were touching the front element of the lens in order to be get them in focus!

I'd suggest you simply use a 10 or 12mm extension tube on your 28/1.8 and see if that gives the results you want. It's not a flat field lens, so you'll likely see some softness in the corners, and some vignetting if using relatively large aperture... But those don't always detract, might even enhance an image in some cases.

About the widest true macro lens you ever see are 35mm. You might look for some vintage, manual focus lenses that are easily adapted (external link).

The image below was shot with an old manual focus Tamron SP 90mm f2.5 that I bought for very little money a while back. I have about $60-65 in it all together, and $40-45 of that was getting a chipped EOS Adaptall2 from China.

IMAGE: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5125/5283068575_5d2187dd6f_b.jpg
Bee on orange poppy
Tamron SP 90mm f2.5 macro lens (1:2, vintage, adapted) with 20 or 25mm extension tube, at f11. EOS 7D camera at ISO 400, 1/400 shutter speed. Handheld, available light (no flash).


IMAGE: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5017/5453385847_10a2a40bec.jpg
The Tamron 90mm on one of my 7Ds.

IMAGE: http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4100/5431198523_7f1b5eb06c.jpg
For size comparison, 4 macro lenses: Canon EF 100mm f2.8 USM, Canon 180mm f3.5L, Canon TS-E 45mm and Tamron SP 90mm f2.5.

IMAGE: http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4150/5431199189_58692ba80a.jpg
The same 4 macro lenses set up to shoot.

It's a little challenging to take shots with vintage, adapted lenses. Both focus and aperture control are fully manual. At the f11 used for the bee on the flower above, my viewfinder was very dark, manual focus quite tricky, and Focus Confirmation stops working. I threw away a lot of shots that missed focus. Also, apapted lenses don't record correct info in the EXIF metadata. Some can be programmed to show the focal length (or approx.) and max lens aperture (or approx.), but none can show the actual aperture that was used.

I also use TS-E lenses for macro a lot... The 45mm usually... Can't recall using the 24mm for macro. Once again, manual focus... but that's no problem with macro. Full aperture control though!

Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,793 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Wide macro lenses
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1482 guests, 186 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.