Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Jan 2012 (Monday) 11:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

35L or 135L

 
joelmarineau
Senior Member
360 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: QC, Canada
     
Jan 16, 2012 11:40 |  #1

Hi guys, I was actually regarding for a 35L to match my 24-105 f4L but I am actually thinking about adding a 35mm f2 + 135L for about the same amount of money. Both are gonna be used for portraits and the 35 for video inside the house for family shooting.

Still don't know what to do ? 35L or 35f2 + 135L




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sonnyc
Cream of the Crop
5,175 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Jun 2005
Location: san jose
     
Jan 16, 2012 11:47 |  #2

The 35L can't really do portrait as well as the 135L...well it can for some instances but wont have the same look. The 135L is a bit long for indoor. So you're at two extremes. The 35 f2 and the 135 seem like a good alternative.


Sonny
website (external link)|Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joelmarineau
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
360 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: QC, Canada
     
Jan 16, 2012 11:51 |  #3

Well, I prefer the 35mm over the 50mm so I know it is going to be for full body portrait and landscape. But, I also know that I am going to use the 35mm focal lenght much more than the 135...?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
4,546 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jan 16, 2012 11:51 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Since you have 24-105, get the 135L first and keep saving for the 35L;)


5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickr (external link) | My Images on Getty®‎ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sonnyc
Cream of the Crop
5,175 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Jun 2005
Location: san jose
     
Jan 16, 2012 11:54 |  #5

You can check out the 100 f2 as well, 95% of the 135 for 1/3 of the cost.


Sonny
website (external link)|Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 16, 2012 14:23 |  #6

I'd get the 135L, it'll give you a bit more reach.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Erik_L
Goldmember
3,160 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Minnesota
     
Jan 16, 2012 16:48 |  #7

I have the 35L and 135L, but I usually use my 35L and Sigma 85 as my go-to two-lens combo. As someone mentioned, the 100 f/2 would be an excellent alternative, and the 35 f/2, unless you really need that extra stop. I find that the 35L is a very frustrating lens, but I love it when it works with me :)


Canon EOS 1D III
Manfrotto 190X Pro B w/324RC2 "Action Head" | Canon 580EX II
Sigma 20 f/1.8 | Canon 35 f/1.4 L | Sigma 50 f/1.4 | Sigma 85 f/1.4 | Canon 135 f/2 L
Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMind
Senior Member
Avatar
629 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2005
Location: London, UK & Azores
     
Jan 16, 2012 17:18 |  #8

You don't have a choice, you must get both ;) I'm saving for the 130L myself, as I got the 35L


NullMind
Sony A7R + Zeiss 15 2.8, Zeiss 21 2.8, Zeiss 85 1.2,TS-E 17L, 100L, 135L, Canon 50 0.95, Voigtlander 35 1.2, Helios 44M-6, 580EX II, Feisol 3441S, Markins Q3T Red
Full Gear & Feedback
Please excuse the Typos, Brain and Finguers can't sync.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davisphotos
Member
190 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Portsmouth, NH
     
Jan 16, 2012 17:23 |  #9

I just got my 35L today, it's an absolutely amazing lens. I also have the 35mm f2, which I just gave to my assistant for a long term loan, it doesn't even come close to the 35L. I haven't used the 135L myself, but for portraits on a full frame device, you will find it much better than the 35mm. You could also consider the 85mm f1.8, it makes a pretty great portrait lens.


Maine Wedding Photographer Andrew Davis (external link)
New England Commercial Photography (external link)
Andrew Davis Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Jan 16, 2012 17:29 |  #10

I'd rather the 35L than the 135L.

You obviously have both focal lengths covered (well, almost....105mm is reasonably close to 135mm).

So the difference is mainly the aperture, having the extra three stops at 35mm or having the extra two stops at 105/135mm.

IMO, for portraiture the longer a lens is, the less you need a very fast aperture. This is because we tend to use longer focal lengths for more tightly framed portraits. And when you shoot tightly framed, very fast apertures do not give enough DOF.

So I'd rather have a 35L which I could use for very loosely framed environmental portraits at f/1.4 than have a 135L which I'll mostly use for head & shoulders type shots where I have to stop down anyway.

And note that it is generally very easy to blur a background out with a long lens, even when using a small aperture.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imposterjeff
Goldmember
1,545 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Dallas tx
     
Jan 16, 2012 17:29 |  #11

BOTH




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CanonYouCan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,489 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 22
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Belgium
     
Jan 16, 2012 17:29 as a reply to  @ davisphotos's post |  #12

The difference is that you will keep your 35L for lifetime (how many are sold secondhand?) and that you will sell your 135 f2 for a 70-200 2.8L IS MKI or II.

The 135L has perfect IQ but is not the only one, also the 200 2.8L...
The only big problem is the working distance, that's why it's sold so often.

With the 35L you can portrait a person with the environment, use it for home celebrations, it's really allround. With the 135L you often have to step far behind (if possible) to get something more in the frame.

It's a nice candid lens or portrait for studio work or if you have time and space.


Sony A7 III | Metabones V | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Sigma 85 1.4 Art | 70-200 2.8L II
Lighting : Godox AD600B TTL + Godox V860II-S + X1T-S
Modifiers: 60cm Collapsible Silver Beautydish + grid | Godox 120cm Octagon softbox + grid + Speedlite Flash bender
Tripod: Vanguard Alta 253CT carbon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
biggcstylez
Senior Member
468 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida
     
Jan 16, 2012 18:13 |  #13

135L is money for portraits on a full frame. Have been extremely happy with mine. You just need a lot of space to work with. I went through this same debate (35L vs 135L) and bought the 35L because i figured that my 24-70 f2.8L does 35mm very, very well (albeit not nearly as fast).

Really depends what you are trying to do with it.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/biggcstylez/ (external link)
Gear: Canon 5D Mark II | 35 f1.4L | Σ 85 f1.4 | 135 f2L | 580EXII | 430EXII x2 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StructuredAmazing
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 16, 2012 22:08 |  #14

davisphotos wrote in post #13715219 (external link)
I just got my 35L today, it's an absolutely amazing lens. I also have the 35mm f2, which I just gave to my assistant for a long term loan, it doesn't even come close to the 35L. I haven't used the 135L myself, but for portraits on a full frame device, you will find it much better than the 35mm. You could also consider the 85mm f1.8, it makes a pretty great portrait lens.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

I say 35L
because i hear many issues with the 135mm


"Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil"
StructuredAmazing forever.
My website: Pending...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Edwin ­ Herdman
Senior Member
747 posts
Joined Aug 2011
     
Jan 16, 2012 22:17 |  #15

This is a tradeoff: The 35mm or the 135mm. One won't work in situations where the other would have. Just get one and make the most of it, and get the other when you can afford (and need) it. You know what kind of pictures they take, so why ask us?

StructuredAmazing wrote in post #13716954 (external link)
I say 35L
because i hear many issues with the 135mm

I say you hear a bunch of hearsay!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,656 views & 0 likes for this thread, 24 members have posted to it.
35L or 135L
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1277 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.