Found this cool sculpture at a local office building in Houston. Reminds me of Stargate. Minimal processing in Photomatix Pro. Most processing done in Perfect Effects in Photo Suite 6.
May 01, 2012 08:07 | #271 Found this cool sculpture at a local office building in Houston. Reminds me of Stargate. Minimal processing in Photomatix Pro. Most processing done in Perfect Effects in Photo Suite 6. - Alfredo -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
-AP- Goldmember  More info | May 01, 2012 20:00 | #272 digital_AM wrote in post #14359334  Found this cool sculpture at a local office building in Houston. Reminds me of Stargate. Minimal processing in Photomatix Pro. Most processing done in Perfect Effects in Photo Suite 6.
WEBSITE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 01, 2012 22:22 | #273 -AP- wrote in post #14363265 Cool shot! Thank you! - Alfredo -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ohhbekay Senior Member 604 posts Likes: 23 Joined Feb 2012 Location: Philly More info | May 03, 2012 19:17 | #274 mattpugs wrote in post #14353158 Had to make do with what I had...battery park, as close as it is to the statue is still quite far and the plane was at least 1500 feet up. The shots I was able to get of just the plane with the zoom lens came out much more detailed. I appreciate the comment though. Two from my weekend trip to DC  Capital Hill by Matthew Pugliese, on Flickr Capital Building by Matthew Pugliese, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mattpugs Senior Member  619 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jan 2012 Location: Brooklyn, NY More info | May 03, 2012 20:52 | #275 ohhbekay wrote in post #14375589 I like this, but go back and dodge the the building. I think youd like what can come out of it. Too much?  Capital Building2 by Matthew Pugliese, on FlickrCanon 5D Mark III | Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 | Canon 85mm f/1.8 | Canon 100mm 2.8 | Canon 135mm f/2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GaryMcDuffie Goldmember  3,022 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Scottsbluff, NE USA More info | May 03, 2012 21:08 | #276 I guess the question has to be asked, just what are you wanting to show in these images? I'm sure someone likes them, but to most, they are just not what we would put our names on. YMMV. Gary
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mattpugs Senior Member 619 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jan 2012 Location: Brooklyn, NY More info | May 03, 2012 21:25 | #277 Good question but the answer won't matter with the harshness of your post...its cool if you wouldn't put your name on it, I will. I come here for advice with photomatix...I have seen far worse hdrs in this thread but thanks for comment. Canon 5D Mark III | Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 | Canon 85mm f/1.8 | Canon 100mm 2.8 | Canon 135mm f/2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2012 02:43 | #278 mattpugs wrote in post #14376074 Too much? Capital Building2 by Matthew Pugliese, on FlickrThis is a good shot. The things I see that needs to be fixed are....the vignette is too strong(could do w/o it) and the small halo at the top left of the building. Other than that,awesome photo mattpugs. There is nothing worse than a brilliant image of a fuzzy concept. - Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2012 02:47 | #279 Don't remember if I posted this one or not. Also,Im too tired to go back and check. So...  Untitled by DBiasphotography, on FlickrThere is nothing worse than a brilliant image of a fuzzy concept. - Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dabert07 Goldmember  1,596 posts Likes: 247 Joined Jan 2010 More info | May 04, 2012 10:28 | #280 Gary McDuffie wrote in post #14376159 I guess the question has to be asked, just what are you wanting to show in these images? I'm sure someone likes them, but to most, they are just not what we would put our names on. YMMV. wow straight up disrespectful. Canon 5D 2, 450D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LHeyden Senior Member  More info | May 04, 2012 10:42 | #281 Editied post: My photo was not worthy of posting in this thread. Any newbies wanting to post, don't bother, you are not welcome here. Laura Heyden
LOG IN TO REPLY |
imjason Goldmember 1,667 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Regarding the recent comments and posts on C&C: Canon gear: EOS M, Canonet QL17, SX230HS, S95, SD1200IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gchmblee Member 186 posts Joined Oct 2011 More info | May 04, 2012 15:12 | #283 imjason wrote in post #14379928 Regarding the recent comments and posts on C&C: While this is an application thread, some of the problems with the photos are not just processing related. The actual photography part is the problem too. If people bracketed shoots with high dynamic range, better results will yield. This is the HDR subforum. Plenty of these photos here in this thread are NOT HDR photos. There are photos processed with Photomatix, but that doesnt make it an HDR photo. HDR stands for high dynamic range. Some of the photos posted are just low dynamic range photos with some pretty colors and contrast. Not HDR. And some photos processed with Photomatix ends up with even less dynamic range than before process. Like any type of photography, HDR scenes and compositions need to be studied and found. One cannot just run a photo through photomatix with hopes of a pretty photo. quote for truth www.gregchamblee.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gchmblee Member 186 posts Joined Oct 2011 More info | May 04, 2012 15:15 | #284 my only complaint on this image is i left the aperture at 4.0 and forgot to raise to 11 or 16. i will retake it when i get the opportunity. i need to reprocess it as well to lose the halo around the front of the tractor. im very critical of my work and this one bugs me, but its still a great subject  HDR Tractor by gregchamblee, on Flickrwww.gregchamblee.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LHeyden Senior Member More info | May 04, 2012 15:25 | #285 imjason wrote in post #14379928 Regarding the recent comments and posts on C&C: While this is an application thread, some of the problems with the photos are not just processing related. The actual photography part is the problem too. If people bracketed shoots with high dynamic range, better results will yield. This is the HDR subforum. Plenty of these photos here in this thread are NOT HDR photos. There are photos processed with Photomatix, but that doesnt make it an HDR photo. HDR stands for high dynamic range. Some of the photos posted are just low dynamic range photos with some pretty colors and contrast. Not HDR. And some photos processed with Photomatix ends up with even less dynamic range than before process. Like any type of photography, HDR scenes and compositions need to be studied and found. One cannot just run a photo through photomatix with hopes of a pretty photo. OUCH Man, take it easy on a newbie. I just wanted have some fun with my camera, I know I'll not be able to compare with the experts on here. From now on I'll just comment on others' photos and only post photos that are worthy. That may take a while. Laura Heyden
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1518 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
