Folks, can you suggest a quality notebook for to deal with photos that will have a very good resolution, will be fast and will look good too?
Anything you know is particularly good?
Thanks!
Jan 23, 2012 05:45 | #1 Folks, can you suggest a quality notebook for to deal with photos that will have a very good resolution, will be fast and will look good too? www.lightpilgrim.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick3434 Goldmember More info | Jan 23, 2012 05:50 | #2 Why not a Mac? Photography aside, the MacBook is like the best laptop I have ever had, sure you get ripped off initially, but after that it is so good you forget about it. Everything is relative.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 23, 2012 05:52 | #3 Mainly the software - I do not like Apple....I really prefer to stick to PC and Windows. Also the price - for the same components you pay 200% with apple. www.lightpilgrim.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mattia Senior Member 528 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2009 More info | Jan 23, 2012 06:50 | #4 light_pilgrim wrote in post #13752376 Mainly the software - I do not like Apple....I really prefer to stick to PC and Windows. Also the price - for the same components you pay 200% with apple. Ish. Compare a Macbook to an equivalent high-end, similarly specced windows PC (that means Sony Vaio's, some of the Lenovo ThinkPads, some of ASUS's top end models in my book) and the price difference isn't huge. You pay a good bit of premium for extra fit and finish. Even the Mac Pro is 'competitively' priced compared to workstations from, say, Dell. 5DII | 300D | 30D IR | 17-40L | 24-105L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS | 100-400L IS | 15 FE | 35L | 50/1.8 mk I | 135L | Sigmalux 50/1.4 | Sigma 105/F2.8 Macro | C/Y Planar 50/1.4 | C/Y Distagon 35/2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MCAsan Goldmember 3,918 posts Likes: 88 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Atlanta More info | What do you mean by deal with photographys?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 23, 2012 07:22 | #6 Mattia, you are probably right for US or maybe Western European reality. Sadly not for Easter Europe www.lightpilgrim.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 23, 2012 07:24 | #7 I mean for Photoshop work. MCAsan wrote in post #13752568 What do you mean by deal with photographys? That could be anything from as simple as downloading files from the cards to the laptop file system only....all the way through detailed final edts in LR/PS/Nik/Topaz....and then printing. For me the laptop is just for file collection and doing quickscans to see which files to delete. My laptop screen is not color calibrated and large enough to do serious editting. So all the save files come back to desktop for importing into LR. There I have a 25" screen that is color calibrated plus all the plug tools needed for serious editting. If you only want to do photo file collection, email reading, and some Internet browsing in the field, you can get by with a relative small and inexpensive unit. www.lightpilgrim.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MCAsan Goldmember 3,918 posts Likes: 88 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Atlanta More info | The next question is will use use the native screen for work back at your home or office or connect the laptop to a large monitor? In the field you might tolerate a 13" or 15" screen. But a 17" screen would be easier to use.....but it adds cost/weight/size. So if you will attach a screen to the laptop for serious edits, then a 15" laptop is likely a good size choice.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jim_T Goldmember 3,312 posts Likes: 115 Joined Nov 2003 Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada More info | Jan 23, 2012 08:50 | #9 I think the big problem with using a laptop exclusively for editing is the screen.. As MCAsan points out, laptop screens aren't that big. I prefer a large monitor when editing photos. I currently use a 24 inch widescreen and would like to go larger, but I'm limited by desktop space.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
guru Junior Member 25 posts Joined Jun 2006 More info | Jan 23, 2012 08:54 | #10 light_pilgrim wrote in post #13752376 Mainly the software - I do not like Apple....I really prefer to stick to PC and Windows. Also the price - for the same components you pay 200% with apple. "I do not like Apple" is not the reason, let alone valid one. Macbook PROs are so much ahead every other laptops on the planet it is just ridiculous, and I'm not talking just about hardware side, but the software one too. Windows is to OS X just like a ripoff chinese iPhone to the original one. I can safely bet you've never seriously used an Apple computer, because no one has been there and returned to PC/Windows, expecially if you do any multimedia work, audio, video or photo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kf095 Out buying Wheaties More info | OP, did you check dedicated part of this forum for this kind of questions? M-E and ME blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
harcosparky Goldmember More info | Jan 23, 2012 09:21 | #12 light_pilgrim wrote in post #13752376 Mainly the software - I do not like Apple....I really prefer to stick to PC and Windows. Also the price - for the same components you pay 200% with apple.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Unregistered.Coward Senior Member 884 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Looking thru the viewfinder More info | Jan 23, 2012 09:24 | #13 light_pilgrim wrote in post #13752578 I mean for Photoshop work. I am now working on a very poor notebook and need something better. Wanted to get a PC, but they are loud and huge. iMac - massively expensive. This is how I came to getting a better notebook.... Not knowing what is generally availalble to you, the question is kind of arbitrary. I don't consider the current desktop offering loud or huge and they probably offer the best return on the dollar. A big plus for the desktop: the monitor. As big or small as you desire and can afford. Upgrade the processor, another hard drive, change the video card. ....the best camera is the one you have on you at the time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MCAsan Goldmember 3,918 posts Likes: 88 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Atlanta More info | I can safely bet you've never seriously used an Apple computer, because no one has been there and returned to PC/Windows, expecially if you do any multimedia work, audio, video or photo. You would be betting very incorrectly. I had my first Mac in 84. Yes, all of 128kRAM, 9" monitor and no HD. I remember taking it in for the big upgrade....to 512KRAM. Had the Mac designer signatures inside the case. Had it for around 4 years. Went to Windows in the Windows 3.1 days. Anyone remember that release? ha ha Been building my on PCs every since.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
palmor Senior Member More info | Jan 23, 2012 10:41 | #15 guru wrote in post #13752833 "I do not like Apple" is not the reason, let alone valid one. Macbook PROs are so much ahead every other laptops on the planet it is just ridiculous, and I'm not talking just about hardware side, but the software one too. Windows is to OS X just like a ripoff chinese iPhone to the original one. I can safely bet you've never seriously used an Apple computer, because no one has been there and returned to PC/Windows, expecially if you do any multimedia work, audio, video or photo. And for your needs, I would suggest any Macbook PRO 15" with highres screen, it's the perfect balance between portability and usability. And this is why threads like this get locked. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 907 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||