Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 24 Jan 2012 (Tuesday) 04:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Bride "complains" about looking fat in the images.

 
this thread is locked
TweakMDS
Goldmember
Avatar
2,242 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Netherlands
     
Jan 24, 2012 04:23 |  #1

I recently took some shots at my friend's wedding. I've done two paid weddings before, and since this was such a low profile wedding (the wedding party consisted of 12 people), I thought it would be nice to give it my best attempt to at least leave them with a couple of good shots.

When processing, I wasn't at all unhappy with the result and sent him a preview of ~40 shots. My friend told me both him and his wife were quite surprised to how "big" she looked. From these tactical words from him to me, I can imagine she could be quite unhappy with them.
Especially considering she's not fat at all and even lost a bit more weight for the wedding.

To the point: I shot most of their wedding with a 5D + 24-105, 28 1.8 and 85 1.8.
Angles were mostly head on, or maybe slightly from above / below.
I know from experience that it can look better to shoot subjects with slightly rounder faces with a wider lens, and maybe a bit more angled from above, but when shooting duo portraits, there's not as much wiggleroom.

I've attached a two examples.
Do any of you have any recommendations for me on how to handle photographing people who display these features?
Or should they just accept that she looks rounder on camera?

PS. Both of these shots are still in preview stage, so don't judge me on the flare in #1 and the rough skin in #2 (if that even makes the cut), I'll be working on it :)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
~Michael
Gear | Flickr (external link)
"My featured shots" (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
siddr20
Goldmember
Avatar
2,165 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sydney-Australia
     
Jan 24, 2012 06:14 |  #2

I think its just the way she is smiling. I dont think she looks "fat" at all.

Maybe just get the liquify tool and edit a pic or two and see if they like it. If so and they want it on every image then charge them extra for editing.


www.sidd-rishi.com.au (external link)http://www.sidd-rishi.com.au (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
6,148 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Jan 24, 2012 06:50 |  #3

I see both of your posted shots were at 85mm, so it's not like you were too close. Maybe you could have shot from a higher angle, or she could have been standing up straighter, but it's hard to judge when you don't know what the person looks like in real life. The only thing I can think of is to use something like Portrait Professional and shrink her face, but hope that she doesn't have before/after pics and say "hey what did you do to me?"


Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Jan 24, 2012 06:54 |  #4

Without knowing how she really looks, I'd say the pictures are what they are.

There are other things you can do to slim someone while shooting. Shoot longer lenses and stay away from wider ones which can make your subject look large relative to the background. The 85 you used is a good choice.

Also, do NOT have them face directly towards the camera (which she is doing in both of these images) as it broadens the face. Better to have her head at ~45 degrees and look back to the camera with just her eyes which can slim her face.

Finally, the lighting on her is rather flat. If you're unfamiliar with the terms, look up short and broad lighting patterns; short lighting can also slim someone's appearance.

Beyond that, I don't do much. I personally don't liquify, but others do and they can do it quite successfully.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TweakMDS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,242 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Netherlands
     
Jan 24, 2012 07:26 |  #5

Thanks for the responses. I also noticed that the "straight into the camera" shots display the effect the most. I personally think she looks great in these shots, but it appears to be a combination of factors that can make her look wider than she is:
- when looking straight into the camera
- relatively tight sleeves on her dress
- hairstyle (loose hair usually covers the sides of her face)
- color contrast of a pale face against a warm background
- (perhaps) a type of pose / smile that might not be 100% natural to her

Below is one of the other shots that look more "like her". I'm not really planning to use liquify or anything. Moving pixels is not my thing. Replacing them or hiding some is, but moving... not so much :)
For the record, these pics were shot as a guest and as a favor to my best friend for the last 27 years. If I have to spend a few hours in photoshop to make his wife slightly happier about the shots, I don't really mind.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
~Michael
Gear | Flickr (external link)
"My featured shots" (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
highway0691
Senior Member
Avatar
672 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jan 24, 2012 08:30 |  #6

TweakMDS wrote in post #13758588 (external link)
Or should they just accept that she looks rounder on camera?

I know there are some things we can do to make someone look thinner but it's a bit unrealistic to expect these little tricks to come-off in every photo. If someone is large then it really is their responsibility, this has annoyed me on occasions when people ask me to make them look skinny!

Quite often it is a reality check for some people to see how they look especially after they've been told all day how beautiful they look.

You should feel no responsibility for this as I'm sure they know that you had not had much experience with photographing weddings.


There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept. Ansell Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SMP_Homer
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,709 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Mar 2008
Location: London, Ontario
     
Jan 24, 2012 08:35 |  #7

She hasn't accepted her looks for some reason...
There are techniques to help make someone look slimmer, but the subject will be the subject regardless of what camera trickeries you use


EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
Sig35A, Sig50A, Sig85A, Sig14-24A, Sig24-105A, Sig70-200S, Sig150-600C
100-400L, 100L, 100/2, 300 2.8L, 1.4x II / 2x II
600EX-II X3, 430EX-III X3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
darosk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,806 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
     
Jan 24, 2012 09:15 |  #8

^ I agree, I think she looks just the way she looks. I think that she just isn't satisfied with that, and a lot of people aren't. It's not like you've used any trickery to make her look 'wider' than she actually is (and why would you???). I think you've done what you could.


Tumblr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Youtube (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Jan 24, 2012 09:19 |  #9

My analysis is that her hair style does nothing to make her face appear smaller. She's not bone skinny by any stretch and it just looks like she has a relatively larger and round face making her appear heavier than she actually is. In the last photo, she's also got a slightly flabby chin, so again, she's not bony skinny by any stretch. I agree about shooting her at an angle, and possibly from an angle that doesn't show the flabby chin. Otherwise, sure, liquify. I liquify myself in photos my wife takes of me. :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonwhite
Goldmember
Avatar
1,279 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 24, 2012 09:24 |  #10

Face square on and from low down will never be the most flattering angle for a heavier bride. If her head was turned slightly in those first two pics I think they would be a whole lot more flattering.

At certain times of the day you are stuck with what you can get (e.g. ceremony if your not allowed to move around and have to stay in one place) but for portraits and posed stuff theres stuff you can do to make brides look smaller.

This thread Jamie did ages ago has some good tips > https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=286827


Wedding Portfolio Website (external link) | Wedding Photographer Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14871
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 24, 2012 09:26 |  #11

One of the problems with weddings is that you cant control every aspect of all the shots. For bridal portraits you can use the techniques discussed above, controlling the angle she faces the camera, the angle the light hits her face and make her look good. But thats only part of the event. You cant pose them on the alter, you cant light them perfectly from every angle at the reception, so there will be some fodder for someone with body issues. Its not limited to heavier women either. I shot a very fit model once who complained about how fat she looked.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chet
showed up to keep the place interesting
44,018 posts
Gallery: 132 photos
Likes: 2462
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 24, 2012 09:28 |  #12

nicksan wrote in post #13759499 (external link)
I liquify myself in photos my wife takes of me. :lol:


You must use the whole bottle. :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Jan 24, 2012 09:37 |  #13

Chet wrote in post #13759552 (external link)
You must use the whole bottle. :lol:

Sometimes I use it too much and end up looking like that guy in Men in Black after he got his head blown off and it was growing back. :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Numenorean
Cream of the Crop
5,013 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Feb 2011
     
Jan 24, 2012 13:08 |  #14

She isn't fat, but she has a pudgy face. Not much you can do about it, but you look like you were shooting up in the first one which isn't the best idea.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Jan 24, 2012 13:20 |  #15

I never use liquefy. There are much better tool in Photoshop to slim.
She does have a round face. Like others have said shooting down would help and a long lens.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,654 views & 0 likes for this thread, 34 members have posted to it.
Bride "complains" about looking fat in the images.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1487 guests, 187 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.