Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 Jan 2012 (Tuesday) 13:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Used 40D producing more grain than expected?

 
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,261 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Jan 26, 2012 18:13 |  #31

MuteGoose, before you get too far into things you might want to see how to go about going back to the factory defualt settings, then learn and make changes from there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Jan 26, 2012 18:16 |  #32

John from PA wrote in post #13774588 (external link)
MuteGoose, before you get too far into things you might want to see how to go about going back to the factory defualt settings, then learn and make changes from there.

Didn't even think of that; but yes, this is very good advice.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Jan 28, 2012 18:35 |  #33

It's precisely because of the "guesswork" that's involved in using evaluative metering mode that I don't generally use it.

Instead, I use spot metering and manual mode. I point my spot meter at something in the scene, and set the exposure so that the meter reads the tone value that I want the area under the spot to have.

In the case of the OP's image, I'd either meter off the snow and set my exposure to +2 (the idea being that it's supposed to be white looking, but not quite so white that you can't see the highlights in it), or I'd meter off the bird and set my exposure to +1 1/3 or so.

That approach works nicely for most situations. It's only when the light itself is changing relatively quickly that an automatic exposure mode is more appropriate, and even for that you can still use spot metering in the same way: set the exposure compensation so that the meter reads the tone you want the area under the metering spot to have.


Evaluative does have its uses, mainly when the light and the scene is changing quickly, such that there really isn't anything you can meter off of that should have a constant tone in the shot. Such situations are relatively rare.


Ultimately you have to figure out what method works best for you. The above method works best for me because it is logical and relatively straightforward. It just takes a bit of practice to learn how the tones you tell the camera to expose for wind up looking in the shot after the fact.


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MuteGoose
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
181 posts
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jan 28, 2012 22:33 as a reply to  @ kcbrown's post |  #34

I did wipe the camera before I started using it, had some very strange settings on it when I received it.

Thanks everyone for the great info!


Canon 5D Mark II | Canon 7D | Canon 24-105L | Canon 17-35 2.8L | Canon 50mm 1.8
My Flickr, Be Gentle. (external link)
Always seeking new knowledge on that new adventure.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,437 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
Used 40D producing more grain than expected?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1569 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.