Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
Thread started 24 Jan 2012 (Tuesday) 21:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Macro DOF Question

 
askydiver
Member
Avatar
221 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 186
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Canton
     
Jan 24, 2012 21:20 |  #1

Hello all,

This is my first post in Macro. A little about me, I have a 7D with a 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS lens. I don't have a collar for it yet. It does seem to affect things in my practicing, but I'm not sure how much yet. Other than just manually focusing seems to move the camera around a bit even with the ball head locked down tight. I.e. it kind of springs a bit as I manually focus it.

Anyway, my question is how do I increase my DOH slightly. Plz see the attached picture. It's DOF is so razor thing that the eyes and head are sorta in focus, but his body falls off out of focus. It seems like I should be able keep the entire body of a ladybug in focus with this lens. I had the focus distance selector set at the .3-.5m. Should I have changed it to .5 to infinity or full? I was using live view to focus with the camera zoomed in at 10x. I will say that the focusing is tricky, I don't have to turn the barrel very far to move the focus a lot.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Exif:
Focal Length: 100 mm
Shutter Speed: 1/125 sec.
Aperture: 11
ISO/Film: 100

Hope my question makes sense.

Thanks in advance,
BK

1Dx | 7D2 | EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS | EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II | And a few more red lines.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frankk
Senior Member
825 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: NJ, USA
     
Jan 24, 2012 22:17 |  #2

Since you don't want to give up focal length, your best bet is to stack. To stack, start by focusing where you did, then focus back a bit, then back a bit more, and so on. Then use software to assemble (stack) the multiple [focus bracketed] shots into a single focused shot with great DOF.

Edit: Photoshop will stack. There's also a number of dedicated packages. I use Photoshop so can't give advice on the other options...though there are lots out there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBigDog
Goldmember
2,068 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 681
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sicklerville, NJ, USA
     
Jan 24, 2012 22:43 |  #3

like frank suggests really the best you can do is stack photos if you want the entire subject to be detailed and in focus. It takes some practice, but from the looks of it you're off to a good start!
You may want to diffuse your flash a bit, some of the other users have some great do it yourself ideas that work wonders.
Hope this helps, keep practicing :)


Christian
http://www.cegphotogra​phy.com/ (external link)
Member, Full Disc Aviation (external link)
Flickr (external link) * Facebook (external link)
Instagram (external link)Aviation Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
askydiver
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
221 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 186
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Canton
     
Jan 25, 2012 18:12 as a reply to  @ TheBigDog's post |  #4

Thanks guys, agree about the flash. I had a small Apollo light modifier thingy on the flash that I got for Christmas. I will give the focus stacking thing a try. Are you just using the align layers and then using masks to mask out the out of focus parts?

Thanks again!
BK


1Dx | 7D2 | EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS | EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II | And a few more red lines.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBigDog
Goldmember
2,068 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 681
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sicklerville, NJ, USA
     
Jan 26, 2012 05:44 |  #5

you can do it manually if you're good in photoshop, CS4 and 5 i believe have a process built in to accomodate stacking.
there's also a couple programs that will do it for you, Helicon, Zerene just to name a couple.


Christian
http://www.cegphotogra​phy.com/ (external link)
Member, Full Disc Aviation (external link)
Flickr (external link) * Facebook (external link)
Instagram (external link)Aviation Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snowyman
Goldmember
Avatar
4,263 posts
Gallery: 682 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 6552
Joined Oct 2011
     
Jan 26, 2012 07:56 |  #6

I'll just say what I think I would do. The problem with that is I know a lot less than anyone about photography than is reasonably expected of any one giving advice on photography!

The lens you have is very good and only really starts giving poor results at around F16. So I would utilise F13 a lot and use a flash. I would work very hard to find a good method of diffusing it. I would also use one of two techniques for focusing: 1. Manual focus through viewfinder, leaning in toward the subject, focusing on the eyes until they go out of focus then retreating just enough to refocus them. This way I am using the entire DOF for the subject and wasting none on the foreground. Method 2 would be to sway back and fourth slightly whilst taking three exposures. This is useful if the critter is unlikely to be in one place very long, as it gives me 3 chances of catching it just right. As a bonus I may also get a stackable subject.

The problem with live view and zooming in on the subject to focus is that I lose the relationship between my subject and its environment. As important as the subject is, the image and its composition is pretty important and maybe I shouldn't leave it to chance. If at all possible I want to be making creative decisions with the camera in my hand and not be dependent upon cropping and post-processing.


Snowy's Gear
Deviant Art (external link)
Flickr (external link)
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IdiotsAbound
Senior Member
255 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2007
Location: London, Ontario
     
Jan 26, 2012 22:30 |  #7

You might want to try using a focusing rail instead of trying to turn the focusing ring.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,244 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Macro DOF Question
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1223 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.