Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 25 Jan 2012 (Wednesday) 13:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Buying a new lens white box ?

 
cepaw
Member
133 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2010
     
Jan 25, 2012 13:10 |  #1

If I buy the 24-105 from b and h photo is it worth saving the $50 now for the white box ? Or will it make resale value much less ? I know it's the same lens just taken from a kit


www.michaelrhodesphoto​graphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gameface
Senior Member
Avatar
672 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Boston
     
Jan 25, 2012 13:12 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

You buy lenses worrying about the resale value? I've got top dollar for glass sans box in good condition.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Virto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,647 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Elgin, IL
     
Jan 25, 2012 13:33 |  #3

Some people are anal about boxes, I am not one of them.

I've paid the going rate for used glass without boxes or manuals, and my 17-40 didn't even come with the bag.

Take care of the lens, save the 50 bucks now. It won't affect resale to 95% of the buying population.


Kelly - EOS 5D - EOS 40D - Rebel XS - EOS 10D - EOS 1D - SX230 - AE-1 - OM-1n - Minolta Himatic7 - EOS-1N
ABR800 - Several flashes, remote triggers, stands, too many and yet not enough lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_48
Goldmember
Avatar
2,068 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Brookfield, MA
     
Jan 25, 2012 13:45 |  #4

Virto wrote in post #13766919 (external link)
Some people are anal about boxes, I am not one of them.

I still have the original box from a Bronica EC and lens I bought back in 1976 from Cambridge Camera Exchange. I still also have the camera. :lol:

Edit: Just found the receipt for that purchase in my files. Camera body and 75mm f/2.8 Nikkor lens $423.
So not only do I have the original box, I also have the original receipt for the purchase. I'll do better on the resale of this kit than most.


Megapixels and high ISO are a digital photographers heroin. Once you have a little, you just want more and more. It doesn't stop until your bank account is run dry.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
themadman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
18,871 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Northern California
     
Jan 25, 2012 13:58 |  #5

I personally don't care about boxes. I might hurt the resale a couple bucks at most. Whats $5 out of $800 right?


Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​com (external link) | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cepaw
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
133 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2010
     
Jan 25, 2012 15:06 |  #6

thanks, just did not want to find out that $50 saved now somehow drastically affects resale. I dont anticipate ever selling this lens but you never know what will come out in a few years.


www.michaelrhodesphoto​graphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chomish
Goldmember
Avatar
1,917 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jan 25, 2012 15:20 |  #7

I have sold many, many things on both Ebay and Craigslist. The items i have listed on both selling sites with pictures of boxes, manuals and everything that originally came with lens when i purchased it, usually sells much faster and at times for more than a picture of just a lens.

I know it doesnt mean much to some but to others it gives a reassurance that the lens was kept in really good shape or barely used.


:) 5D-2 Mark ii :) 16-35 2.8L | 24-70 2.8L | 85 1.2 IIL | 70-200 f4 ISL | 70-200 2.8 IS IIL | 24-70 2.8L |MP-E 65 | 580EX, 430EX, MT24-EX | :p :p :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
redflash
Senior Member
Avatar
726 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jan 25, 2012 15:23 |  #8

it's the same lens mate, doubt it will affect the price if and when you sell it as a second hand lens


Canon 60D Gripped Tamron 17-50 (non-VC) | 18-55 | 18-135 | Nifty50 | 70-200 f2.8 L IS Mk II | YN565 | ManFriday | Carry Speed Strap
razzi (external link) flickr (external link)
Just trying to have a little bit of fun folks, that's all :cool: - Dean Martin

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,913 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14873
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 25, 2012 15:23 |  #9

It might disqualify a certain group of buyers. I've had potential buyers who wouldn't consider a purchase because I didnt have the original warranty card and my reciept even though I told them I had purchased the lens used from an individual. Some people are just plain picky. But it shouldn't matter much as its common knowledge that lens was originally bundled with the 5D and 5DII.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gameface
Senior Member
Avatar
672 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Boston
     
Jan 25, 2012 15:26 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

chomish wrote in post #13767446 (external link)
I know it doesnt mean much to some but to others it gives a reassurance that the lens was kept in really good shape or barely used.

I don't see how someone keeping a box in their closet reassures anyone the lens is in good shape. Do you store your glass in their boxes? :rolleyes:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jan 25, 2012 15:31 |  #11

cepaw wrote in post #13767372 (external link)
thanks, just did not want to find out that $50 saved now somehow drastically affects resale. I dont anticipate ever selling this lens but you never know what will come out in a few years.

it's a fair question. take a look at what rolex boxes sell for on ebay. the reason there is such a lucrative market for rolex boxes -- and many of them are fakes -- is because not having the box detracts from resale value.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 25, 2012 15:32 |  #12

sure, $50 is worth it. you don't take photos with the box, and if you feel the need for a brightly colored box you can pick one up on Fleabay for about $20




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
redflash
Senior Member
Avatar
726 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jan 25, 2012 15:34 |  #13

yeah, but those same people would want the lens to be relatively new as well - I'm guessing the OP will be buying the lens to USE and get many years of joy out of it


Canon 60D Gripped Tamron 17-50 (non-VC) | 18-55 | 18-135 | Nifty50 | 70-200 f2.8 L IS Mk II | YN565 | ManFriday | Carry Speed Strap
razzi (external link) flickr (external link)
Just trying to have a little bit of fun folks, that's all :cool: - Dean Martin

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OneJZsupra
Goldmember
Avatar
2,378 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Guam
     
Jan 25, 2012 15:35 |  #14

That and the resale value of the box won't that be that big of a difference.... In fact even if you got the lens WITH the box and sold it it wouldn't make up for that $50 it cost just to get it. Just save the $50 and get a CPL or something


Gear List | Feed Back | My Site (external link)
YN RF-603 O-ring solution


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jan 25, 2012 15:38 as a reply to  @ OneJZsupra's post |  #15

let's put it this way. i'd sell my box for $50. i'll even give you two for $75 :D!

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,194 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Buying a new lens white box ?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is EBiffany
1386 guests, 112 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.