Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 26 Jan 2012 (Thursday) 10:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Product photography

 
porky101
Senior Member
609 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jan 26, 2012 10:50 |  #1

Hey guys ,

How is this picture of a watch I want to sell on E-bay....

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7163/6766272411_1f480e1fce_b.jpg

Please let me know if its ok!

Thanks

porky-



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmoore323
Goldmember
Avatar
1,945 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
     
Jan 26, 2012 10:57 |  #2

For E-bay it looks fine, for a product shot I would have tilted the face more towards the camera and cropped a little tighter...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
Goldmember
Avatar
4,314 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1591
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Jan 26, 2012 10:58 |  #3

Cool shot, watch looks expensive. If you want to be picky...straighten the watch and brighten the shot a bit. With product shots, if your intent is to sell, you want to showcase the product in a way that the photo makes the potential buyer say "WOW!!" when they see it. Plus, from my own experiences with eBay, the picture says it all, which is why I always put the best possible pictures I can on there.


People turn away pretty fast if they can't see what they're getting. I'd also put a watermark on the photo, it's a nice photo, and you don't want to see somebody else using it.


The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
porky101
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
609 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jan 26, 2012 10:59 |  #4

hmmm good point , the 6 is being cut off a bit by the glass...thanks dude!

@ Kato , hmm good point..ill think of some ideas...ill try dropping it in some water and do one of those shots people always do with fruits (its waterpoof)

Also , I am trying to brighten the picture but im blowing out the highlights......is it properly exposed? I purposefully exposed mainly for the face of the watch....

porky-




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
Goldmember
Avatar
4,314 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1591
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Jan 26, 2012 11:13 |  #5

On the original shot, duplicate the layer, then change the layer properties to "Screen", it'll brighten the shot, and then you can adjust the opacity of the layer to get the levels you want. As for dropping it in water, I don't think that's necessary, just simple, effective, shots of the front and back, strap/clasp, etc..


I took the liberty of doing a few simple adjustments to your shot, duplicated the layer and did the "Screen" thing, then USM, and then noise reduction. And since I don't know your name I used your username for the watermark...


IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7168/6766370181_2aeac8e6dd_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/katodog/6766370​181/  (external link)
Locman Watch Edit (external link) by Ed Durbin (Katodog) (external link), on Flickr

The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadow ­ on ­ the ­ Door
Senior Member
Avatar
960 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Jan 26, 2012 11:14 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

why would you watermark his shot?


19 year old photographer with a 5D, and some L glass.
500px - Jamesr (external link)
Graphic Design Services Offered

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
Goldmember
Avatar
4,314 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1591
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Jan 26, 2012 11:19 |  #7

So people know it's not mine, that I only edited someone else's shot.


The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
porky101
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
609 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jan 26, 2012 11:34 |  #8

hhmmm....just by watermarking it it makes the shot look more proffesional:D nice work!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
Goldmember
Avatar
4,314 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1591
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Jan 26, 2012 11:42 |  #9

You'd be surprised at how much image theft I see on eBay. It's nice to watermark the better shots on there, not only does it prevent theft but it also makes you look like you give a crap about giving the "customer" a good show.


The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Jan 26, 2012 11:55 |  #10

Not only image theft, but ebay itself will take an image and offer it when someone else is listing the same item.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
Goldmember
Avatar
4,314 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1591
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Jan 26, 2012 11:58 |  #11

Exactly. Apparently nobody around there knows what "copyright" is...


The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnb007
Senior Member
352 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2011
Location: SoTx
     
Jan 26, 2012 18:09 |  #12

I know this is a bit contradictory of the posts above, but I have found a good clear armature shot is not a bad way to go. When I see a product shot on eBay that is too professional I get the feeling that it is a "stock" picture and not what you are getting. I would get some just "snapshots" included in the gallery and be sure to explain that all the pictures of the exact item up for sale. Also explain that you are into photography.

Oh great shot!


-John
Canon 5DIII I 70-200 2.8L I 24-70 2.8L I 100 2.8L macro
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
Goldmember
Avatar
4,314 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1591
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Jan 26, 2012 18:19 |  #13

That's why I suggested front/back, strap/clasp shots...


The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cpam.pix
Goldmember
1,275 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Apr 2011
     
Jan 26, 2012 22:29 |  #14

The watch is in tack sharp focus...I find the unfocused brand name on the box to be distracting. I'd either reshoot for focus on the brandname and put it into the shot with PP or clone it out completely.


1D-III with stuff to stick on it:
70-200L, 28-70L, 24-105L, 300L, 50, 10-17 fish, 2.0x TC
Image editing OK, encouraged, and expected. Thank you for helping me learn!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
porky101
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
609 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jan 27, 2012 04:14 |  #15

Hmm , I have thought about that

I have shots @ F4 and F11 and I prefer it when the brand name is out of focus like it is...its still readable but doesent pull away too much attention from the watch. I dont want to clone it out as it really is there...so by cloning it out im taking away part of the product!

Thanks guys:)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,951 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Product photography
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1237 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.