Sorry for the goofed title, hit enter before I was ready.
DPP'd this on home PC, but when I went view it at work to show friends it looked too dark. Not if my work monitor is too dark or if my home monitor is too bright.
Tiggity-T Member 221 posts Joined Nov 2008 More info | Jan 26, 2012 13:46 | #1 Sorry for the goofed title, hit enter before I was ready. 7D, 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM, 580EX, 50 1.4 USM, 2̶4̶-̶1̶0̶5̶L̶ ̶f̶/̶4̶, S̶i̶g̶m̶a̶ ̶5̶0̶ ̶f̶/̶1̶.̶4̶,̶ 4̶3̶0̶E̶X̶
LOG IN TO REPLY |
h4ppydaze Goldmember 1,329 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2011 More info | Jan 26, 2012 14:01 | #2 Definitely a little dark.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Jan 26, 2012 14:05 | #3 A little dark, but then again it looks like warm evening light so it may be pretty accurate.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
h4ppydaze Goldmember 1,329 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2011 More info | Jan 26, 2012 14:12 | #4 accurate schmaccurate
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PIX-R-IT Senior Member 387 posts Joined Dec 2011 Location: Oregon More info | Jan 26, 2012 20:52 | #6 Its pretty close now maybe just a bit brighter. My photoshop says +15 and stop.Nice specs there Spiderman!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop  More info | Jan 26, 2012 22:08 | #7 Check the histogram out of CS5 levels. Move the right point (white point) left to the black graph.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 26, 2012 22:11 | #8 Thanks for the feedback. How does it look now?  7D, 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM, 580EX, 50 1.4 USM, 2̶4̶-̶1̶0̶5̶L̶ ̶f̶/̶4̶, S̶i̶g̶m̶a̶ ̶5̶0̶ ̶f̶/̶1̶.̶4̶,̶ 4̶3̶0̶E̶X̶
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Jan 26, 2012 22:14 | #9 Looks good to me
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AtomicPenguin Member  144 posts Joined Nov 2011 Location: LINY/CT More info | Jan 26, 2012 23:45 | #10  Permanent banStill dark. Definitely adjust it in the histogram. White point 230, mid point 1.15 for me looks about right. Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I'm afraid of blowing out the details of the clouds in his glasses if I go any brighter. 7D, 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM, 580EX, 50 1.4 USM, 2̶4̶-̶1̶0̶5̶L̶ ̶f̶/̶4̶, S̶i̶g̶m̶a̶ ̶5̶0̶ ̶f̶/̶1̶.̶4̶,̶ 4̶3̶0̶E̶X̶
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AtomicPenguin Member 144 posts Joined Nov 2011 Location: LINY/CT More info | Jan 27, 2012 16:37 | #12 Permanent banTiggity-T wrote in post #13777299  I'm afraid of blowing out the details of the clouds in his glasses if I go any brighter. You should be able to isolate the contents of the lens fairly simply...it is already framed. Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
djphatjive Member  247 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: Thornton, Co More info | Feb 01, 2012 02:40 | #13 Can you edit out the cameraman in the lens? Canon T2i Rebel with...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Feb 01, 2012 18:26 | #14 AtomicPenguin wrote in post #13776187 Still dark. Definitely adjust it in the histogram. White point 230, mid point 1.15 for me looks about right. No, it's looking good now. If you brighten the highlights more you're going to start to look texture and detail in the skin and over expose the skin. Highlight retention is a problem for digital. The shadows should be lightened some but that doesn't mean you need to also brighten the highlights.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1443 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
