Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 27 Jan 2012 (Friday) 11:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Can't decide lens for landscape

 
Karim1980
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
236 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jan 28, 2012 16:18 |  #31

newphoto wrote in post #13784693 (external link)
In my HMO their is more than just the extra stop difference between the 17-40 and the 16-35 II. I have had both, compared them side by side and the 16-35 has higher resolution, less chromatic fringing, and less vignetting. You get what you pay for.

But is the $800-$1000 difference really worth it? Would your client or friend know the difference? For most and I am one of them too, we are our own biggest critics and it is usually the photog themselves that will be able to tell the difference and from the pictures that I have seen from both lenses, it is quite difficult to tell. Both are stellar lenses and with the money I will save if I go with 17-40L which I will be, I can buy another backup body or maybe another lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
newphoto
Senior Member
360 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Oklahoma
     
Jan 28, 2012 16:31 |  #32

Karim1980 wrote in post #13784732 (external link)
But is the $800-$1000 difference really worth it? Would your client or friend know the difference? For most and I am one of them too, we are our own biggest citics and it is usually the photog themselves that will be able to tell the difference and from the pictures that I have seen from both lenses, it is quite difficult to tell. Both are stellar lenses and with the money I will save if I go with 17-40L which I will be, I can buy another backup body or maybe another lens.

No problem. Many have the 17-40 and like it. The extra money was worth it to me because I could tell a difference, but friends and family, definitely not.


Colin in Oklahoma
6D, 5D III, 16-35 L IS, 24-105 L IS, Macro 100 L IS, 100-400 L IS, 500 F4 L IS II, 1.4 Canon Extender III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mag10
Senior Member
357 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Apr 2011
Location: CA Bay Area and Taiwan
     
Jan 28, 2012 18:23 |  #33

Good choice on the 17-40. Great landscape lens for the price.


Canon EOS 5D Mark III | Sony DSC-RX100M3 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM | Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM ART | Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT Dedicated flash ST-E3 RT controller

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,606 posts
Likes: 416
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
Jan 28, 2012 18:36 |  #34
bannedPermanent ban

newphoto wrote in post #13784791 (external link)
No problem. Many have the 17-40 and like it. The extra money was worth it to me because I could tell a difference, but friends and family, definitely not.

My rule of thumb...I need to be satisfied with my photos. If others are...then it's a bonus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karim1980
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
236 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jan 29, 2012 16:30 as a reply to  @ Hogloff's post |  #35

Just went ahead and bought 17-40L with the hoya pro1 uv filter. Was not going to purchase this soon but price and condition was just too good to pass from a very great selller. At the same time went and bought the expodisc as well :). Now, need the snow gone soon :lol:.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,241 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Can't decide lens for landscape
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1126 guests, 189 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.