Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation 
Thread started 27 Jan 2012 (Friday) 12:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Natural Looking HDR

 
HaroldC3
Goldmember
3,043 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 363
Joined May 2007
Location: West Richland, WA
     
Jul 07, 2019 07:50 |  #3181

Stiga wrote in post #18889419 (external link)
I suspect that, like me, many are using HDR (or blending) without mentioning it in their posts.

I always use HDR when shooting into the sun (or have bright sky and a shadowy foreground). Here is an example.

That could very well be it. I only mention it half the time when I post photos.

I definitely use it when shooting into the sun. I need to get better at looking at my histogram. It will tell me if I need to use it or not.


Flickr (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,806 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Likes: 868
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Post edited 4 months ago by ejenner. (2 edits in all)
     
Jul 07, 2019 19:59 |  #3182

Yea, I use HDR or blending a lot, often times I could just boost the shadows for posting on the web, but if printing the extra shadow detail and less noise is nice.

This one definitely needed multiple exposures (or a grad or two.).

EDIT: actually I lie. I just checked, and although I bracketed 5 exposures for the HDR, the second exposure, with highlight and shadow recovery in Capture One, I could make a perfectly decent web image. I guess that brings into the question of when HDR is needed.

Also focus stacked this, again, not needed for a web image, but definitely for a print.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Storms building and heading to the front range, Grizzy Peak, CO.

Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
5,860 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 649
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Jul 09, 2019 09:02 |  #3183

ejenner wrote in post #18889770 (external link)
...

This one definitely needed multiple exposures (or a grad or two.).

EDIT: actually I lie. I just checked, and although I bracketed 5 exposures for the HDR, the second exposure, with highlight and shadow recovery in Capture One, I could make a perfectly decent web image. I guess that brings into the question of when HDR is needed.
...

This little journey of self discovery (LOL) is pretty much why HDR is not on the front page of every photo blog and youtube video. Sensors have gotten better, photographers have started to understand how to expose for raw data and not JPEG files and raw converters have become better at exploiting all of the raw data, through better tone mapping and highlight and shadow recovery.

Another thing that people are figuring out is that the use of HDR techniques for actual HDR is dictated by the scene, not the desire to use HDR software on everything.

Hopefully Trey Ratcliff will just fade into the annals of history and we can all get back to taking nice pictures of challenging scenes, and maybe, every once in a while, let our shadows plug up and our non-important highlights clip a little.

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
UK_MARK
Goldmember
Avatar
1,327 posts
Gallery: 58 photos
Likes: 4885
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portsmouth UK
     
Jul 09, 2019 15:21 |  #3184

Taken whilst out in Turkey a couple of weeks ago.
SNS.

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48224730706_a4d70315a6_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2gts​mjf  (external link) Turkey (external link) by Mark (external link), on Flickr

My Flickr (external link)
Gear- - Canon 6D - Canon 7D mkII - Canon 80D - Canon 17-40L - Canon 500mm L F4 - Sigma 105 F2.8 OS Macro - Canon EF 40mm F2.8 STM - Sigma 24-105 F4 ART - Canon 1.4 III - Lee filter system.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
C ­ Scott ­ IV
Goldmember
Avatar
2,666 posts
Gallery: 479 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 4000
Joined Feb 2011
Location: East Texas
     
Jul 09, 2019 19:11 |  #3185

kirkt wrote in post #18890579 (external link)
This little journey of self discovery (LOL) is pretty much why HDR is not on the front page of every photo blog and youtube video. Sensors have gotten better, photographers have started to understand how to expose for raw data and not JPEG files and raw converters have become better at exploiting all of the raw data, through better tone mapping and highlight and shadow recovery.

Another thing that people are figuring out is that the use of HDR techniques for actual HDR is dictated by the scene, not the desire to use HDR software on everything.

Hopefully Trey Ratcliff will just fade into the annals of history and we can all get back to taking nice pictures of challenging scenes, and maybe, every once in a while, let our shadows plug up and our non-important highlights clip a little.

kirk

Withe the 7D I used HDR more because I had to. Now shooting with the 80D and the R there doesn't seem to be near the need for it.


Charles
www.CScott4.com (external link) | Instagram (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Gear | Image Editing OK and critique welcome
"Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships." Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
F2Bthere
Goldmember
Avatar
1,126 posts
Likes: 501
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jul 16, 2019 06:15 |  #3186

Just got the Franzis newsletter offering HDR Projects 2018 Pro for $20. That's a pretty deep discount. :)


C&C always welcomed...
On my images, of course, and on my words as well--as long as it's constructive :).
https://www.instagram.​com/storyinpictures_co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stiga
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,692 posts
Gallery: 888 photos
Likes: 3833
Joined Dec 2015
Location: Nr Perth, Scotland
     
Jul 16, 2019 06:34 |  #3187

F2Bthere wrote in post #18894483 (external link)
Just got the Franzis newsletter offering HDR Projects 2018 Pro for $20. That's a pretty deep discount. :)

Try it before you buy it. I did just that 18 months ago and could noty come to terms with it - can't remember why!


Martin
I'm not a gear guy but I have a tons of software :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
russellsnr2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,047 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 90
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Greek Island of Rhodes.. Ex. Sussex @ Cumbria
     
Jul 16, 2019 10:25 |  #3188

F2Bthere wrote in post #18894483 (external link)
Just got the Franzis newsletter offering HDR Projects 2018 Pro for $20. That's a pretty deep discount. :)

Hi, Bought there software (HDR projects 5 professional) was OK but that's it , next time I got a message from them was offering me to upgrade to the newer version $25.00 instead of RRP $89.00 no in between small upgrades. Russ.


Many Thanks,
Russell.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
F2Bthere
Goldmember
Avatar
1,126 posts
Likes: 501
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jul 18, 2019 03:37 |  #3189

Well, is seemed like a good deal :)

The serial number would not work. Customer service seems to not answer direct questions and comes off as rude (language issue?). They stated my serial number is for a previous version??? Are they just clueless or intentionally selling old versions?

Time will tell.


C&C always welcomed...
On my images, of course, and on my words as well--as long as it's constructive :).
https://www.instagram.​com/storyinpictures_co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roseyposey
Goldmember
4,762 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 2509
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
     
Jul 18, 2019 03:52 |  #3190

One shot run through sns-hdr I think, but might have been Photomatix, as sns-hdr are watermarking since my reinstall on new computer, but think I circumvented it somehow.

Anyway one shot - run through the software to try lift the shadows as I hadn't bracketed.

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48313492187_af527a8674_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2gBi​h1B  (external link) P1022036-3_Compressor (external link) by Rose McGillicuddy (external link), on Flickr

Panasonic G9: Lenses covering 8 - 300mm
Canon M5: A variety of Canon, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, prime and zoom lenses, Samyang fisheye, 2 lovely Minolta MD, just for fun a Helios 44-2 58m - and adapters.
Rose
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rose_mcgillicud​dy/ (external link)
"Dance among the moonbeams, feel the magic in the air."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roseyposey
Goldmember
4,762 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 2509
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
     
Jul 18, 2019 06:10 |  #3191

Single shot - sns-hdr to try bring up shadows a little on the left.

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48313492187_af527a8674_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2gBi​h1B  (external link) P1022036-3_Compressor (external link) by Rose McGillicuddy (external link), on Flickr

Panasonic G9: Lenses covering 8 - 300mm
Canon M5: A variety of Canon, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, prime and zoom lenses, Samyang fisheye, 2 lovely Minolta MD, just for fun a Helios 44-2 58m - and adapters.
Rose
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rose_mcgillicud​dy/ (external link)
"Dance among the moonbeams, feel the magic in the air."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stiga
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,692 posts
Gallery: 888 photos
Likes: 3833
Joined Dec 2015
Location: Nr Perth, Scotland
     
Jul 20, 2019 05:31 |  #3192

roseyposey wrote in post #18895703 (external link)
Single shot - sns-hdr to try bring up shadows a little on the left.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2gBi​h1B  (external link) P1022036-3_Compressor (external link) by Rose McGillicuddy (external link), on Flickr

I used to use this technique but I now use ACR to get similar results

BTW, I think you would have ended up with a better image if you had used a bracketed set.

I also note that blue sky only appears behind tree branches:

IMAGE: https://i.imgur.com/E4XNfyK.jpg

This could be a processing glitch or an atmospheriuc fluke!

Martin
I'm not a gear guy but I have a tons of software :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roseyposey
Goldmember
4,762 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 2509
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
     
Jul 21, 2019 01:52 |  #3193

Stiga wrote in post #18896779 (external link)
I used to use this technique but I now use ACR to get similar results

BTW, I think you would have ended up with a better image if you had used a bracketed set.

I also note that blue sky only appears behind tree branches:
QUOTED IMAGE

This could be a processing glitch or an atmospheriuc fluke!

Yes bracketed is better. A bit of poor technique all around, with shooting into the sun, not bracketing, as no tripod, and it was just a random, spontaneous shot. Despite iit's deficiencies I like it :-) - but that's the nature of a hobby/interest.


Panasonic G9: Lenses covering 8 - 300mm
Canon M5: A variety of Canon, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, prime and zoom lenses, Samyang fisheye, 2 lovely Minolta MD, just for fun a Helios 44-2 58m - and adapters.
Rose
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rose_mcgillicud​dy/ (external link)
"Dance among the moonbeams, feel the magic in the air."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stiga
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,692 posts
Gallery: 888 photos
Likes: 3833
Joined Dec 2015
Location: Nr Perth, Scotland
     
Jul 21, 2019 04:17 |  #3194

roseyposey wrote in post #18897259 (external link)
Yes bracketed is better. A bit of poor technique all around, with shooting into the sun, not bracketing, as no tripod, and it was just a random, spontaneous shot. Despite iit's deficiencies I like it :-) - but that's the nature of a hobby/interest.

The need for a tripod nowadays is a myth! I always bracket when shooting into the sun but have not used a tripod for over 15 years! Here is an example.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


As long as you have IS lenses, you should be okay. Try it.

Martin
I'm not a gear guy but I have a tons of software :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roseyposey
Goldmember
4,762 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 2509
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
     
Jul 21, 2019 05:45 |  #3195

Stiga wrote in post #18897273 (external link)
The need for a tripod nowadays is a myth! I always bracket when shooting into the sun but have not used a tripod for over 15 years! Here is an example.

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by Stiga in
./showthread.php?p=188​97273&i=i45734770
forum: HDR Creation


As long as you have IS lenses, you should be okay. Try it.

I think it depends how good you are at hand holding, and what the slowest shutter might end being. I have done brackets in bright sunlight hand held, but doubt I would have managed it on the occasion we refer to, as it was about ten or fifteen minutes away from sunset, and the light goes fast at this time of the year.


Panasonic G9: Lenses covering 8 - 300mm
Canon M5: A variety of Canon, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, prime and zoom lenses, Samyang fisheye, 2 lovely Minolta MD, just for fun a Helios 44-2 58m - and adapters.
Rose
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rose_mcgillicud​dy/ (external link)
"Dance among the moonbeams, feel the magic in the air."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

905,434 views & 3,639 likes for this thread
Natural Looking HDR
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Darkod
1486 guests, 216 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.