Oh, and
==** Happy Birthday, Clare **==
Pete I was "Prime Mover" many years back....  38,631 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Berkshire, UK More info | Jun 13, 2012 04:38 | #8806 |
souporman UK SE Photographer of the Year 2011  5,463 posts Likes: 9 Joined Sep 2006 Location: London, UK More info | Quick question about a position I'm in. Won't mention which person I am, but here's the summary: http://www.evilkitchen.ca
LOG IN TO REPLY |
felt_tip_felon UK SE Photographer of the Year 2010  9,042 posts Likes: 10 Joined May 2008 Location: West Sussex, U.K. More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:05 | #8808 souporman wrote in post #14572229  Quick question about a position I'm in. Won't mention which person I am, but here's the summary: Person A: Owns a lens Person B: Borrows the lens, breaks it and offers to replace. A: Declines, no need. 1 year passes A: Now has need, requests the lens be replaced B: Agrees, though circumstances have changed and it's better for person A to buy and have the money refunded by B A: Does nothing 5 more years pass A: Another request for the lens to be replaced Do you think person A is unreasonable to request the replacement after 6+ years? (ignore the fact that lens prices are now 30% higher  )I would say my answer depends on if you are person A or B 500px
LOG IN TO REPLY |
souporman UK SE Photographer of the Year 2011 5,463 posts Likes: 9 Joined Sep 2006 Location: London, UK More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:13 | #8809 felt_tip_felon wrote in post #14572233 I would say my answer depends on if you are person A or B hehe, that's why I didn't say which one I was http://www.evilkitchen.ca
LOG IN TO REPLY |
felt_tip_felon UK SE Photographer of the Year 2010 9,042 posts Likes: 10 Joined May 2008 Location: West Sussex, U.K. More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:17 | #8810 I would say that person B has acted in good faith - however, 6 years is a long time and whilst person A may be disgruntled a lot of time has elapsed since the last request. at no stage did person B not offer to replace the item. 500px
LOG IN TO REPLY |
courier Cream of the Crop  6,674 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: East London, UK More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:23 | #8811 A has left it too long tbh and the original declination of requirement to replace negates all future requests imo Gear | http://www.hip-fire.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
felt_tip_felon UK SE Photographer of the Year 2010 9,042 posts Likes: 10 Joined May 2008 Location: West Sussex, U.K. More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:26 | #8812 courier wrote in post #14572262 A has left it too long tbh and the original declination of requirement to replace negates all future requests imo Are you Mr B? 500px
LOG IN TO REPLY |
courier Cream of the Crop 6,674 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: East London, UK More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:29 | #8813 LOL Gear | http://www.hip-fire.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pete I was "Prime Mover" many years back.... 38,631 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Berkshire, UK More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:29 | #8814 <Spartacus>No, I'm Mr B!<Spartacus/>
LOG IN TO REPLY |
felt_tip_felon UK SE Photographer of the Year 2010 9,042 posts Likes: 10 Joined May 2008 Location: West Sussex, U.K. More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:32 | #8815 500px
LOG IN TO REPLY |
souporman UK SE Photographer of the Year 2011 5,463 posts Likes: 9 Joined Sep 2006 Location: London, UK More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:34 | #8816 felt_tip_felon wrote in post #14572248 I would say that person B has acted in good faith - however, 6 years is a long time and whilst person A may be disgruntled a lot of time has elapsed since the last request. at no stage did person B not offer to replace the item. I personally think person A has left it too long - and it would be totally at the discretion of person B. This is in no way legally binding   lol courier wrote in post #14572262 A has left it too long tbh and the original declination of requirement to replace negates all future requests imo Cheers guys, that's sort of my feeling too. Pete wrote in post #14572271 <Spartacus>No, I'm Mr B!<Spartacus/>
http://www.evilkitchen.ca
LOG IN TO REPLY |
enigma2099 Senior Member  680 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Kent, UK More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:39 | #8817 souporman wrote in post #14572229 Quick question about a position I'm in. Won't mention which person I am, but here's the summary: Person A: Owns a lens Person B: Borrows the lens, breaks it and offers to replace. A: Declines, no need. 1 year passes A: Now has need, requests the lens be replaced B: Agrees, though circumstances have changed and it's better for person A to buy and have the money refunded by B A: Does nothing 5 more years pass A: Another request for the lens to be replaced Do you think person A is unreasonable to request the replacement after 6+ years? (ignore the fact that lens prices are now 30% higher )Sounds like person B was being quite reasonable to agree to replace the lens after 1 year when person A originally told person B there was no need to replace. To then not replace the lens and 5 years later ask again seems a little rough on person B. If it was me, I wouldn't feel that I could reasonably ask for a replacement after such a long time as I had already been given the opportunity and not taken it - but everybody is different so it's a tricky one. Paulhttps://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=10263387
LOG IN TO REPLY |
felt_tip_felon UK SE Photographer of the Year 2010 9,042 posts Likes: 10 Joined May 2008 Location: West Sussex, U.K. More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:41 | #8818 souporman wrote in post #14572280 I'm Person B in the above scenario. I ruined a friends lens when I dropped it along with my camera into the ocean back when I lived in the BVI. Guessed you were by not stating that in the opening details 500px
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Neal Goldmember  3,403 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: London UK More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:41 | #8819 souporman wrote in post #14572154 Gone now  Don't think I can make that either. Was it going to be Sat/Sun again?
Neal EOS 7D, EOS 40D, EOS 650, 24-70mm f/2.8 L, 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200mm f/4.0 L, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.8 I
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Anke THREAD STARTER "that rump shot is just adorable" UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009  30,454 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK More info | Jun 13, 2012 05:49 | #8820 souporman wrote in post #14572229 Quick question about a position I'm in. Won't mention which person I am, but here's the summary: Person A: Owns a lens Person B: Borrows the lens, breaks it and offers to replace. A: Declines, no need. 1 year passes A: Now has need, requests the lens be replaced B: Agrees, though circumstances have changed and it's better for person A to buy and have the money refunded by B A: Does nothing 5 more years pass A: Another request for the lens to be replaced Do you think person A is unreasonable to request the replacement after 6+ years? (ignore the fact that lens prices are now 30% higher )Honestly I'd say that it's a bit cheeky after five years to ask again. After the first decline and the year had passed and Person A asked again yes I would pay up but after so long it's a bit late. Anke
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 2124 guests, 97 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
