Because, I think the 645 effective focal length is like half of 35mm.
So on a FF 645 back the 80 is like 40mm I think, and then at 1.5, it's about 60mm.
I could be wrong with the ratios though.
ok makes sense

Fricks Cream of the Crop is, in fact, a title More info | Feb 05, 2012 19:58 | #3436 *sigh* wrote in post #13831766 Because, I think the 645 effective focal length is like half of 35mm. So on a FF 645 back the 80 is like 40mm I think, and then at 1.5, it's about 60mm. I could be wrong with the ratios though. ok makes sense
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Zerimar Goldmember 3,529 posts Likes: 267 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info | Feb 05, 2012 19:58 | #3437 *sigh* wrote in post #13831769 .6, so with your back you're at like a .9? So now much wider, but slightly wider. Are you going to pick up a different back for your Mamiya? Going to try to sell it for 3500 and then buy another one from Capture Integration with a Leaf Aptus 22mp back for $5600... or save up for phase one like I'd like Rick Rose - Add me!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* THREAD STARTER Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Feb 05, 2012 19:59 | #3438 Fricks wrote in post #13831780 ok makes sense Anyways.... if it was longer than the 35mm equivalent, it wouldn't be a medium format anymore as the sensor would be smaller than 35mm. Which would be a bit pointless.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* THREAD STARTER Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Feb 05, 2012 19:59 | #3439 Zerimar wrote in post #13831782 Going to try to sell it for 3500 and then buy another one from Capture Integration with a Leaf Aptus 22mp back for $5600... or save up for phase one like I'd like Ah, sweet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Zerimar Goldmember 3,529 posts Likes: 267 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info |
Still bigger than 35mm Rick Rose - Add me!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* THREAD STARTER Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Feb 05, 2012 20:02 | #3441 Zerimar wrote in post #13831792
Still bigger than 35mm Showoff...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fricks Cream of the Crop is, in fact, a title More info | Feb 05, 2012 20:07 | #3442 Thats pretty
LOG IN TO REPLY |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop 12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | Feb 05, 2012 20:09 | #3443 Zerimar wrote in post #13831792
Still bigger than 35mm You take such good pictures. But you still have to appreciate webcam pictures
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* THREAD STARTER Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Feb 05, 2012 20:09 | #3444 |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop 12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | Feb 05, 2012 20:10 | #3445 *sigh* wrote in post #13831828 I really do like how MF cameras are setup. The sensor and body are two separate pieces, it would be nice to have the flexibility with SLR's. True... maybe FF sensors would be more affordable then.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fricks Cream of the Crop is, in fact, a title More info | Feb 05, 2012 20:12 | #3446
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* THREAD STARTER Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Feb 05, 2012 20:14 | #3448 laxlife1234 wrote in post #13831832 True... maybe FF sensors would be more affordable then. In all reality it would probably cost more.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
monk3y Totally Saturated More info | Feb 05, 2012 20:14 | #3449 *sigh* wrote in post #13831828 I really do like how MF cameras are setup. The sensor and body are two separate pieces, it would be nice to have the flexibility with SLR's. yeah Zerimar wrote in post #13831792
Still bigger than 35mm its probably easier to clean huh?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* THREAD STARTER Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Feb 05, 2012 20:14 | #3450 monk3y wrote in post #13831844 look at the difference 17mm on FF http://monk3y.zenfolio.com/img/s11/v37/p490340343-4.jpg 12mm of FF http://monk3y.zenfolio.com/img/s11/v32/p127709155-4.jpg 12mm on FF is crazy....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1789 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||