It's 2am: 23rd edition... D800 or 5dmkIII

themadman wrote in post #13916351
LOL, I had to. A red flag just goes off when I hear some person want to buy a 1Ds2 for sports and a 70-200 + a 2x TC

hey....I had that setup

laxlife1234 wrote in post #13916359
It's true!


does IQ really suffer that badly though?

I am not that anal... but I think 70-200mm + 2x TCIII is pretty good...unless Canon's TC is crap

400mm f/6.3

monk3y wrote in post #13917062
its sharp except the child is not

Yeah I know but nothing I can do about that.

Me attempting to be monkey...

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …unetsukiphoto/6​894019087/

I'm Trying To Be M0nk3y

KenjiS wrote in post #13917082
Me attempting to be monkey...

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …unetsukiphoto/6​894019087/
I'm Trying To Be M0nk3y by Kenjis9965, on Flickr

what's so monkey about that?? its not bright enough

your car Kenji?

Now back to me being me..

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …unetsukiphoto/6​894028271/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …unetsukiphoto/6​894028287/

Fricks wrote in post #13917052
Im a noob at PP. I did PP them what do you think needs to be done?

i'm a noob too

play witht the levels and curves. on lr or raw edit, put some vibrant and saturation.

monk3y wrote in post #13917090
what's so monkey about that?? its not bright enough

your car Kenji?

Nope, I did have a truck similar though years ago... Cant find a pic of it

Jake W, when you shoot portraits, make sure you give space for cropping to 8x10, or 5x7 or 4x6, this one at 8x10 is rather tight, you need to pre crop elese Costco or other places will cut off the people.
sorry for the watermark

Thanks tony I'll keep that in mind.

here's a quickie. vibrance, sat, level, curves.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

tonyniev wrote in post #13917149
Jake W, when you shoot portraits, make sure you give space for cropping to 8x10, or 5x7 or 4x6, this one at 8x10 is rather tight, you need to pre crop elese Costco or other places will cut off the people.
sorry for the watermark

Fricks wrote in post #13917155
Thanks tony I'll keep that in mind.

me too. thanks. never thought about them since i dont get mine printed.

DTBaan wrote in post #13917162
here's a quickie. vibrance, sat, level, curves.

That looks much better and love the water mark

monk3y wrote in post #13917074
hey....I had that setup

I am not that anal... but I think 70-200mm + 2x TCIII is pretty good...unless Canon's TC is crap

400mm f/6.3

Steven! whats going on? :P

Fricks wrote in post #13917171
That looks much better and love the water mark

yeah, bring out the color in them is what i would say :P

you didnt like DTPIX?

DTBaan wrote in post #13917180
yeah, bring out the color in them is what i would say :P

you didnt like DTPIX?

That was 2 best.