It's 2am: 23rd edition... D800 or 5dmkIII

H&K USP, a great pistol cost just a little more than FNH

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Glocks are cheapest and very reliable

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

tonyniev wrote in post #13917436
FNH is good, 9 mm ammo is cheaper, SAS still carry them but they train triple tap, i prefer 40 cal newer, higher velocity and weight, I also shoot .45
Here is my stable of Colts 1911 three .45 one 9 mm, Vietnam war era. I also regularly carry a Glock sub compact in 40 and HKUSP in 40

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

So you think the FNH would be a good home protection plus sport gun? I want a .40 cal but i know .9mm is cheaper and if in the event I need to use it for protection it can still be lethal to an intruder

tonyniev wrote in post #13917455
Glocks are cheapest and very reliable

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

I want it to be purdy as well Glock's are just ugly

SUB1IM388 wrote in post #13917456
So you think the FNH would be a good home protection plus sport gun? I want a .40 cal but i know .9mm is cheaper and if in the event I need to use it for protection it can still be lethal to an intruder

Yes, FNH 9 mm would be good, but I do not have an FNH pistol, I have their rifle P90 and tactical shotgun.
I am thinking og getting a Gen 4 Glock and maybe get one in 9 mm for my wife.

Sorry misquoted the FNP 9 is half the price of the H&K and aboutnprice of Glocks.

tonyniev wrote in post #13917469
Yes, FNH 9 mm would be good, but I do not have an FNH pistol, I have their rifle P90 and tactical shotgun.
I am thinking og getting a Gen 4 Glock and maybe get one in 9 mm for my wife.

Im thinking ill go with the FNH... im going to shoot it tomorrow so we shall see what I decide.... its that or the Sig P226 which is a bit more $$

Pretty guns.

BTW I decided on what my line up will be for when I decide to buy more gear....
Nikon D700, Nikon D800, and for glass 14-24 f2.8G, 24-70 f2.8 G, 85 f1.4G, 35 f1.4G 70-200 f2.8G VR II, and 24 f1.4 G

Why Nikon?

SUB1IM388 wrote in post #13917481
Im thinking ill go with the FNH... im going to shoot it tomorrow so we shall see what I decide.... its that or the Sig P226 which is a bit more $$

FNH is cheaper sigs, as some say...Sig is a Sig, althoug 226 is an old model, carried by Jack Bauer.

Fricks wrote in post #13917501
Why Nikon?

cause its gonna be the same price either way..... better AF in its class for now..... the 14-24..... more advanced Flash system..... and im a fan of the more natural (cooler) color rendition that they produce plus the ergonomics

tonyniev wrote in post #13917502
FNH is cheaper sigs, as some say...Sig is a Sig, althoug 226 is an old model, carried by Jack Bauer.

Im also a fan of the P229 but i like the size of the 226 better (bigger more comfortable)

So I'm having drinks and dinner at this place called Sushi Samba. Pretty damn nice place

http://sushisamba.com/​?noredirection=true

SUB1IM388 wrote in post #13917433
whats up Jake!

Winter break!!!! Yay!!!

SUB1IM388 wrote in post #13917493
BTW I decided on what my line up will be for when I decide to buy more gear....
Nikon D700, Nikon D800, and for glass 14-24 f2.8G, 24-70 f2.8 G, 85 f1.4G, 35 f1.4G 70-200 f2.8G VR II, and 24 f1.4 G

Mighty fine line-up

vipergts831 wrote in post #13917515
So I'm having drinks and dinner at this place called Sushi Samba. Pretty damn nice place

http://sushisamba.com/​?noredirection=true

Nice and pricey, they have one at Palazzo Hotel.