Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 30 Jan 2012 (Monday) 12:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which filter size needed for this lens?

 
trailguy
Senior Member
Avatar
449 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Home, college, career at Wilmington NC
     
Jan 30, 2012 12:31 |  #1

Hi,

On my Canon 17-55 2.8 (77mm) lens, will a 84x120mm GND filter be sufficient or is a 100x150 mm needed for enough movement latitude?

I'm looking at buying Singh-Ray ND and GND (.6) filters.

Thanks for any experienced advice.




Perfectionism is the highest form of self-abuse
"Best wide-angle lens? Two steps backward"
Ernst Hass 1952

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Russ61
Senior Member
Avatar
265 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Tacoma, WA area
     
Jan 30, 2012 16:40 |  #2

I have a 10-22mm and 100-400mm lens, both requiring 77mm filters. Atop the CPL's typically used I'll handhold Hitech P sized (85 x 110mm) GNDs. Laterally I do have to be somewhat careful to ensure that the edge of the GND doesn't encroach into the frame. Normally the positioning of the transition zone is such that the height is rarely, if ever, a problem, ie so high or low that the opposite end encroaches into the frame. That said, a larger GND would give you more latitude....but typically at 2x the cost and bulkier as well. Your call!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KoalaCowboy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,542 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 526
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Metro Denver, CO, USA
     
Jan 30, 2012 16:42 |  #3

trailguy,
84x120 or 100x150 are not screw-in type filters. Are you planning to use Lee Filters or Cokin Filters?


- -
Pete
Gripped 5D Mk III / 24-105 / 16-35 II / 70-200 II / 600EX-RT / LEE Filters / F-Stop backpacks / Gitzo GT3542LS / RRS BH-55
USKestrel Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jan 30, 2012 16:51 |  #4

On the 17-55, the 84 mm (Cokin P size) with the Cokin WA holder would just about suffice. But if you think you might go wider down the road, I'd get the 100 mm filters and start looking for the Lee holders and WA adapter ring. Cost you less in the long run than having to start over with the bigger filters after having started with the smaller ones..


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
trailguy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
449 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Home, college, career at Wilmington NC
     
Jan 30, 2012 18:51 as a reply to  @ Jon's post |  #5

Thanks for the advice. I'm wanting to buy some Singh-Ray (not screw in) .6 filters. My 'larger' lens, Canon 70-200 L IS is, I think (without going and looking) actually smaller diameter than the 17-55 lens. So, I suppose the 84x120 would work.
Is a Lee holder the best to avoid vignetting? I plan on hand holding, or using painter's tape if necessary.




Perfectionism is the highest form of self-abuse
"Best wide-angle lens? Two steps backward"
Ernst Hass 1952

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jan 30, 2012 19:07 |  #6

If it's the f/4 it's not a 77 mm. But it's the lens' angle of view that matters more than the filter diameter. If you were to go to the 10-22, or FF with a 16-35, you'd want the 100 mm filters. Lee filter holders are 100 mm wide; Cokin P are 84. So there's less likely to be vignetting with the Lee. And hand-holding the filter is fine if the camera's on a tripod, but some times you need to hand-hold the camera, so using a filter holder means getting the shot.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
trailguy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
449 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Home, college, career at Wilmington NC
     
Jan 30, 2012 19:40 as a reply to  @ Jon's post |  #7

Which (Lee or Cokin) would fit it closer to the lens? I belive closer is better?
I attached a recent shot, with a CP, and I like the composition, but a GND added would have (I think) given me more to work with.




Perfectionism is the highest form of self-abuse
"Best wide-angle lens? Two steps backward"
Ernst Hass 1952

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,409 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Which filter size needed for this lens?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1240 guests, 148 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.