Harm wrote in post #15783890
Way to protect the 70-200 between the legs, Scott!
Way to protect the 70-200 between the legs, Scott!
I call it the duck and cover.
scotteisenphotography Never been blessed  4,147 posts Likes: 17 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Apr 02, 2013 16:40 | #6661 Harm wrote in post #15783890 Way to protect the 70-200 between the legs, Scott! I call it the duck and cover. 2X Canon 1Dx|Canon 1D Mark IV|Canon 5D Mark III|14mm 2.8L II|16-35mm 2.8L II|24mm 1.4L II|35mm 1.4L|50mm 1.2L |85mm 1.2L II|70-200 2.8L IS|200mm 2.0L IS|300mm 2.8L IS|400mm 2.8L IS|800mm 5.6L IS| 580EX II| 600EX RT II|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scotteisenphotography Never been blessed 4,147 posts Likes: 17 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Apr 02, 2013 19:42 | #6662 Another Cuba photo:  2X Canon 1Dx|Canon 1D Mark IV|Canon 5D Mark III|14mm 2.8L II|16-35mm 2.8L II|24mm 1.4L II|35mm 1.4L|50mm 1.2L |85mm 1.2L II|70-200 2.8L IS|200mm 2.0L IS|300mm 2.8L IS|400mm 2.8L IS|800mm 5.6L IS| 580EX II| 600EX RT II|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sansational Reverse Psychologist  More info | So Colortek is $7.99 to process photos and email you hi-res jpegs. I love film.  Melody by andrewjsan, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1337. Senior Member  594 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Maine More info | Apr 02, 2013 23:21 | #6664 sansational wrote in post #15785150 I love film. THIS --Jamie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20DNewbie "don't listen to me, I'm an idiot"  2,733 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Massachusetts More info | Apr 03, 2013 00:20 | #6665 sansational wrote in post #15785150 So Colortek is $7.99 to process photos and email you hi-res jpegs. I love film. Thanks for the tip!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scotteisenphotography Never been blessed 4,147 posts Likes: 17 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Apr 03, 2013 09:33 | #6666 We had a beautiful sky one night. The red in the sky is from the fire in the distance -  2X Canon 1Dx|Canon 1D Mark IV|Canon 5D Mark III|14mm 2.8L II|16-35mm 2.8L II|24mm 1.4L II|35mm 1.4L|50mm 1.2L |85mm 1.2L II|70-200 2.8L IS|200mm 2.0L IS|300mm 2.8L IS|400mm 2.8L IS|800mm 5.6L IS| 580EX II| 600EX RT II|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
symbolphoto Cream of the Crop  6,628 posts Likes: 18 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Boston, MA More info | Apr 03, 2013 10:00 | #6667 Fire that high? Was it a refinery by any chance?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sansational Reverse Psychologist More info | Apr 03, 2013 10:01 | #6668 20DNewbie wrote in post #15785572 Thanks for the tip! I stopped my brief stint using film because the only places left locally suck, scratched negatives and the equivalent of web sized cell phone scans of them left me wanting. Not to mention it was more than twice the prices your paying when everything was said and done. Yeah. They can get up to $20 for b&w but that includes prints.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scotteisenphotography Never been blessed 4,147 posts Likes: 17 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Apr 03, 2013 10:18 | #6670 symbolphoto wrote in post #15786580 Fire that high? Was it a refinery by any chance? yes it's from one of the refineries..i just don't know the name for the burning thing. Harm wrote in post #15786591 maybe it is a bright light? Nope it's fire 2X Canon 1Dx|Canon 1D Mark IV|Canon 5D Mark III|14mm 2.8L II|16-35mm 2.8L II|24mm 1.4L II|35mm 1.4L|50mm 1.2L |85mm 1.2L II|70-200 2.8L IS|200mm 2.0L IS|300mm 2.8L IS|400mm 2.8L IS|800mm 5.6L IS| 580EX II| 600EX RT II|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20DNewbie "don't listen to me, I'm an idiot" 2,733 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Massachusetts More info | Apr 03, 2013 10:32 | #6671 scotteisenphotography wrote in post #15786629 ..i just don't know the name for the burning thing. Marshmallow cooker?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 03, 2013 10:34 | #6672 scotteisenphotography wrote in post #15786629 yes it's from one of the refineries..i just don't know the name for the burning thing. flaring.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nathan Can you repeat the question, please?  More info | Apr 03, 2013 10:43 | #6673 Harm wrote in post #15786691 you burn off excess methane gas, as it is 4:1 (something like that) worse off than CO2 for greenhouse gasses. I think it's more like 20:1, but yeah. But what's that have to do with Scott's question? Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scotteisenphotography Never been blessed 4,147 posts Likes: 17 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Apr 03, 2013 10:57 | #6674 Harm just likes to feed us useless info 2X Canon 1Dx|Canon 1D Mark IV|Canon 5D Mark III|14mm 2.8L II|16-35mm 2.8L II|24mm 1.4L II|35mm 1.4L|50mm 1.2L |85mm 1.2L II|70-200 2.8L IS|200mm 2.0L IS|300mm 2.8L IS|400mm 2.8L IS|800mm 5.6L IS| 580EX II| 600EX RT II|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AgentProvocateur Senior Member  More info | Apr 03, 2013 11:11 | #6675 20DNewbie wrote in post #15785572 Thanks for the tip! I stopped my brief stint using film because the only places left locally suck, scratched negatives and the equivalent of web sized cell phone scans of them left me wanting. Not to mention it was more than twice the prices your paying when everything was said and done. Hmm, I believe I forgot to send you this one: My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2420 guests, 103 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
