Any feedback is appreciated, I'm looking to make my shots better. Here are a couple of the ones I liked.
The gallery with 7 more is here if you have time:
http://500px.com/zehcnas![]()
Many thanks.
primosanchez Member 37 posts Joined Mar 2007 More info | Jan 31, 2012 19:28 | #1 Any feedback is appreciated, I'm looking to make my shots better. Here are a couple of the ones I liked.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 31, 2012 19:47 | #2 1. blown out a bit
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jeevz Senior Member More info | Jan 31, 2012 20:04 | #4 For a shot like number 1 i personally would use a ND grad filter or exposure blend - a lot of foreground detail is lost. I think with a bit of photoshop you could make this shot look a lot better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 31, 2012 21:23 | #5 I appreciate it. For #1, does blown out refer to being overexposed? I took with a point and shoot, full auto. What could I have done to get a better shot?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 31, 2012 21:24 | #6 rick_reno wrote in post #13803356 i like #2, where were you on vacation? Thank you. These are from Brazil.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jeevz Senior Member More info | Jan 31, 2012 21:31 | #7 primosanchez wrote in post #13803908 I appreciate it. For #1, does blown out refer to being overexposed? I took with a point and shoot, full auto. What could I have done to get a better shot? Again, thanks. Yes it does - in this case meaning that some areas are clipped because they are overexposed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 31, 2012 22:26 | #8 Jeevz wrote in post #13803399 For a shot like number 1 i personally would use a ND grad filter or exposure blend - a lot of foreground detail is lost. I think with a bit of photoshop you could make this shot look a lot better. I like number 2 and 3 and agree some of the sky could be lost in 3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 31, 2012 22:31 | #9 Jeevz wrote in post #13803983 Yes it does - in this case meaning that some areas are clipped because they are overexposed. Depending on the P&S it may limit your options for ways around it... If you decrease the exposure then the overall picture becomes (more) underexposed. To be honest I don't mind having a small area which is blown out if it means that it doesn't detract from the overall image. You can do things like using filters or exposure blending/masking to get over these problems - that would require a tripod and taking a few different exposures. You can try and edit just the one exposure if you don't have multiple exposures - but you can lose some image quality from doing this. I could try an edit of your photo if you'd like (tick IMAGE EDITING OK in user CP if you would like to allow this all the time) - tbh I am not great at post processing but could see what I can do.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jeevz Senior Member More info | Jan 31, 2012 23:28 | #10 primosanchez wrote in post #13804348 Thanks for the feedback. I'm not familiar with the filter/technique you are referencing. Are those photoshop techniques? That shot was on a P&S, full auto if that helps... If you are using a lens that accepts filters (SLR lens generally) then you can use filters in front of the lens - lots of various filters; look around the forum for examples. The most commonly used filters in Landscape photography are probably circular polarizers, Neutral density (ND) filters, and ND grad filters. IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] Here is a quick edit on your photo:
I cheated and used a plugin for photoshop and then masked certain bits in/out to bring more light on the foreground and brighten up the image in general while trying not to blow out too much. Then just used curves and masks with that too. There are plenty of good free photoshop tutorials around if you google them to help with the basics.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 01, 2012 17:21 | #11 Jeevz wrote in post #13804617 If you are using a lens that accepts filters (SLR lens generally) then you can use filters in front of the lens - lots of various filters; look around the forum for examples. The most commonly used filters in Landscape photography are probably circular polarizers, Neutral density (ND) filters, and ND grad filters. For instance: IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] Here is a quick edit on your photo:
I cheated and used a plugin for photoshop and then masked certain bits in/out to bring more light on the foreground and brighten up the image in general while trying not to blow out too much. Then just used curves and masks with that too. There are plenty of good free photoshop tutorials around if you google them to help with the basics.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Frank_Hollahan Goldmember 2,718 posts Likes: 97 Joined Feb 2005 More info | Feb 01, 2012 18:36 | #12 I like the last one
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 02, 2012 08:56 | #13 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 993 guests, 184 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||