Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 04 Feb 2012 (Saturday) 06:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Buying a Telescope possibly tonight.

 
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Feb 04, 2012 06:39 |  #1

I will hopefully be going to check out a telescope tonight. The guy says it's a Meade 8" Telescope with a tracking system. Sorry the pic isn't all that great (from a Craigslist ad).

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


My question is: What camera adapter do I need for this?

I have an adapter for my Pentax film camera which I also bought an adapter for that to work on my Canon (sort of an adapter for an adapter). I used it on my old Jason Telescope. It may not work with this one. I'm not sure.

Any advice would be helpful.

Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ohata0
Senior Member
561 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 04, 2012 07:20 |  #2

as long as your adapter fits into where the eyepiece goes it should be fine...you should double check on the size of adapter though. I'm not completely sure, but I would think most adapters would be the 1.25" (common size), as opposed to the bigger 2" size (most 2" focusers come w/ adapters for 1.25" eyepieces i think).

Double check that it isn't the older .965" size though...I don't think it's really used much, except for maybe the cheap entry level (department store) telescopes.

Actually, if you are using 2 adapters (adapter to pentax and then adapter to canon), you may want to buy a new adapter...having too many adapters may make it bigger/longer than it should be and harder to reach focus (not close enough to the telescope). I suppose you could always check first before you go and spend money on an adapter you may not need though...

What you normally need are 2 things: A T-ring and a T-adapter. The T-adapter goes into the eyepiece, while the T-ring screws on the adapter and attaches to your camera. You want to get the appropriate T-ring for your camera, obviously. It seems that there are multiple different T-adapters you can get...either the specific one for your telescope, or a 1.25" universal one.

I don't know if the other ones are larger (maybe made for 2" focusers), but if you have a 2" focuser, I would think that getting a 1.25" adapter may cause vignetting. I'm not sure though, as I don't have a telescope and no experience w/ these adapters at this time.

If you have the model number of the telescope, then you should be able to search for that specific type and get a t-adapter and t-ring from meade. Otherwise, you should be fine w/ a universal (1.25") t-adapter.

Hopefully other people w/ actual experience will chime in as well :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Feb 04, 2012 08:12 |  #3

ohata0 wrote in post #13823482 (external link)
What you normally need are 2 things: A T-ring and a T-adapter. The T-adapter goes into the eyepiece, while the T-ring screws on the adapter and attaches to your camera. You want to get the appropriate T-ring for your camera, obviously. It seems that there are multiple different T-adapters you can get...either the specific one for your telescope, or a 1.25" universal one.

Actually that's what I have. I have the T-Adapter and I have the T-Ring for both cameras. One for the Pentax and one for the Canon. After measuring the smaller end of the T-Adapter I see it's 1" in diameter. Is this the right thing to measure or should I measure the inside which is slightly larger. I had an eye piece from my old telescope in this adapter. It's diameter appears to be 1" so maybe I have the older style as you mentioned. I'll probably have to buy a new T-Adapter for it. I will bring this with me and try it out so I know if I'll have to buy one or not. I'm hoping to be able to use this tonight or tomorrow with the camera.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Feb 04, 2012 10:12 |  #4

Here are some photos of the adapter I have for my Canon.

All together the length is just under 4". Looks a little dirty in there. It's not. Must not be polished in there or something.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Looks like the inside is 1.25" in diameter. This may work then.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


And here's the outside diameter measurement.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SteveInNZ
Goldmember
1,426 posts
Likes: 89
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Feb 04, 2012 14:58 |  #5

That looks about LX5 vintage (1980's or 90's). I have one of those. Check for mould on the inside (mirror and front glass). That's a bit of a deal killer. You'll probably find that you have to wind the focus knob a long way to get focus with your adapter. Otherwise, you should be OK with it. The scope has a long focal length and not a very stable mount for DSO stuff. Great for piggy backing your DSLR and for moon/planets.
There's plenty of cheap second hand stuff for these scopes as they were popular for 20+ years. They are a pretty good all-round visual scope and I've chosen to keep mine even though I've bought new mounts and scopes since then.


"Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Feb 04, 2012 15:17 |  #6

He sent it out to be cleaned and should be picking it up today hopefully. I will have a look at it tonight if it's clear outside. Would I be able to detect any mold, mildew if I brought a flashlight to look at it?


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SteveInNZ
Goldmember
1,426 posts
Likes: 89
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Feb 05, 2012 03:06 |  #7

It's probably too late now as you may already own it. :)
Mold looks like spiders web and if it's there, you'll see it with a flashlight.


"Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Feb 05, 2012 03:38 |  #8

Got an email from the guy. He got it back and he says it's so clean now he's having second thoughts about selling it so it must be pretty clean. Hopefully he'll still want to sell it.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Feb 08, 2012 09:11 |  #9

Well, I haven't heard from this guy so I'm assuming he wants to keep it. So I went to the Orion Telescope website and found this one.

http://www.telescope.c​om …c/-1/c/1/sc/14/p/9912.uts (external link)

It has the Go To tracking system which looks pretty cool. It's only $49 more than what this guy was asking for his used one... Is this a good telescope or is there a better one? $450 - $500 is around the amount I want to spend.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SteveInNZ
Goldmember
1,426 posts
Likes: 89
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Feb 08, 2012 13:03 |  #10

It's pretty limiting. That mount style doesn't cope to well with the added weight of a DSLR and the scope is a bit small/slow for deep sky stuff. It would OK for moon and larger planets. It would be a good first scope for visual use. Reasonably portable, easy to setup and help to guide you around.
If you are tempted by the photography side and are looking for a first stepping stone, I would suggest buying something used from one of the astronomy forums like Cloudy Nights or Astromart. They are pretty helpful communities which means that you will get something that suits your needs, rather than taking an uneducated punt on Craigslist or eBay.


"Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,196 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Buying a Telescope possibly tonight.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1642 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.