I expect we will see a Sigma 24-70 2.8 OS real soon........
MGiddingsPhotography Senior Member 964 posts Likes: 10 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK More info | Feb 06, 2012 18:56 | #61 I expect we will see a Sigma 24-70 2.8 OS real soon........
LOG IN TO REPLY |
guyzer09 Goldmember 1,207 posts Likes: 61 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Salem,OR More info | Feb 06, 2012 19:02 | #62 Honestly, I don't see Canon releasing the new 24-70l without IS. Many people have long waited for it and I think with tamron announcing theirs with vc it would take Way too much business away from Canon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 06, 2012 19:06 | #63 lets learn wrote in post #13837448 Sorry i have to post 30 messages before i can do anything on this site. Ive been with the site for a long time now but havent posted anything
Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben805 Goldmember 1,195 posts Likes: 73 Joined Mar 2007 More info | Feb 06, 2012 19:53 | #64 KenjiS wrote in post #13833678 would add girth, but not much weight.... he said girth.....hehehehehe. 5D Mark III, Samyang 14mm, 35LII, 85L II, 100L IS Macro, 24-105L, 70-200L 2.8 IS II. 580EX, AB400, AB800.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 06, 2012 20:35 | #65 guyzer09 wrote in post #13837509 Honestly, I don't see Canon releasing the new 24-70l without IS. Many people have long waited for it and I think with tamron announcing theirs with vc it would take Way too much business away from Canon. Too many can't live without the red ring. Canon will continue to bring in nice profits. _
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Feb 06, 2012 20:44 | #67 clione wrote in post #13833641 hopefully this will put pressure on canon and Nikon to make their own sooner nikon's 24-70 is fairly recent. i don't think canon and nikon feel prodded by tamron...more like the other way around. tamron makes great glass but their lenses don't focus anything like ring USM. the 24-70L whether it's updated or not is the standard. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kcbrown Cream of the Crop 5,384 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Silicon Valley More info | Feb 07, 2012 06:43 | #68 guyzer09 wrote in post #13837509 Honestly, I don't see Canon releasing the new 24-70l without IS. Many people have long waited for it and I think with tamron announcing theirs with vc it would take Way too much business away from Canon. Well, guess what? They did "There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
K6AZ Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 07, 2012 06:57 | #69 kcbrown wrote in post #13840698 Well, guess what? They did And announced two wide angle primes (24 f/2.8 and 28 f/2.8) with IS, exactly where IS is needed the least. I guess because they're slow primes (f/2.8 on a prime? Really), they need IS. ![]() Way to go Canon. You sure know what your customers want. ![]() Slight correction - in the press realease I saw the price is $2600. So not only do you pay 50% more and not get IS you also get to buy much more expensive 82mm filters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gocolts Goldmember 1,246 posts Likes: 14 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Feb 07, 2012 07:25 | #70 Tamron had their act together on their new 70-300...hopefully the same will hold true for this one. Unless you're able to write-off lens purchases as a business expense, I believe many hobbists, regardless of disposable income, will not be able to justify the price of the new 24-70 II....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 07, 2012 07:33 | #71 82mm thread? I can live with that since this one has VC and wont break the bank... If it is as good as the 28-75 with those new features than I am sold. http://natureimmortal.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jbm7777 Senior Member More info | Feb 07, 2012 08:45 | #72 Neilyb wrote in post #13840852 82mm thread? I can live with that since this one has VC and wont break the bank... If it is as good as the 28-75 with those new features than I am sold. Yeah I'm intrigued. I love my 28-75 for days and times when you have decent ambiant light. This could fix any issues I have with the IS. If its anywhere near the price of a used 24-70 mk1 then I'll have a tough decision and it would all come down to IQ. Canon 6D | Canon 17-40L | 70-200L IS II | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | Canon 100L | Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT | xplor 600 | flashpoint 360 | alien bee B800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson More info | I can promise that this will be a very closely watched lens when it gets released. If it performs like the 17-50 and the 28-75......its going to be a huge hit,,,,,,,even if the focus motor is noisy:p Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GregoryF Goldmember 2,336 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Bella Vista, AR More info | Feb 07, 2012 09:54 | #74 umphotography wrote in post #13841567 I can promise that this will be a very closely watched lens when it gets released. If it performs like the 17-50 and the 28-75......its going to be a huge hit,,,,,,,even if the focus motor is noisy:p Have you listened to the Tamron 70-300mm USD VC? The focus motor will not be noisy! 6D, 5D, 7Dii, Eos R and too many lenses, flashes and aux. gear to list!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightRules Return of the Jedi 9,911 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2005 More info | Feb 07, 2012 09:56 | #75 GregoryF wrote in post #13841616 Have you listened to the Tamron 70-300mm USD VC? The focus motor will not be noisy! ![]() True. The Tamron USD is smooth and "swooshy". It's an excellent ultrasonic motor.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1432 guests, 108 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||