
The top right picture on page 3 have perfectly round bokeh balls with an aperture of f/5.6. Interesting...
interesting read indeed... im looking forward to the real world reviews, and a quote from the catalog;
musashi Senior Member 795 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Winchester, CA / San Diego, CA / North Hollywood, CA More info | Apr 09, 2012 21:41 | #736 Rush87 wrote in post #14238792 ![]() The top right picture on page 3 have perfectly round bokeh balls with an aperture of f/5.6. Interesting... interesting read indeed... im looking forward to the real world reviews, and a quote from the catalog; The diaphragm blades maintain a near-perfect circular shape up to two stops down from the fully open state, the position frequently used for creating the blurred effect, adopted the rounded diaphragm to enable exquisite blurred-effect images “You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him.” --==Gear List & Feedback==--
LOG IN TO REPLY |
patliean1 Senior Member ![]() 381 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Chicagoland, IL More info | Apr 09, 2012 22:06 | #737 ...just in time of Tax Refund ...BECAUSE SEEKING VALIDATION FROM ANOTHER PHOTOGRAPHER IS WAY MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE OPINIONS OF PAID CLIENTS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mattmorgan44 Senior Member 644 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2012 Location: Gold Coast, Australia More info | Apr 09, 2012 22:42 | #738 This is tempting me to cancel the 24-70 Mark II for the Tamron. VC and $1000 less is very tempting. The sample pictures don't look outstanding to me, but I would like to see some real user reviews. Only problem is I want a general purpose asap lol! 5D Mark II | 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
patliean1 Senior Member ![]() 381 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Chicagoland, IL More info | Apr 09, 2012 22:48 | #739 If the Tamron can be at least as good as the Canon 24-70L I in IQ but with VC and be $1000 cheaper than the ver II you can be certain I'll purchase one. ...BECAUSE SEEKING VALIDATION FROM ANOTHER PHOTOGRAPHER IS WAY MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE OPINIONS OF PAID CLIENTS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
arentol Goldmember 1,305 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Seattle WA More info | Apr 09, 2012 23:22 | #740 Rush87 wrote in post #14238792 ![]() The top right picture on page 3 have perfectly round bokeh balls with an aperture of f/5.6. Interesting... That would be because the aperture diaphragm is round from f/2.8 to f/5.6. 5D3 | Rokinon 14 f/2.8 | 16-35L II | TS-E 24L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Voigtlander 40 f/2.0 | Σ 50 f/1.4 | MP-E 65 | 70-200 2.8L IS II | Σ 85 f/1.4 | Zeiss 100 f/2 | Σ 120-300 f/2.8 OS | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Fuji X10 | OM-D E-M5 | http://www.mikehjphoto.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2012 23:28 | #741 mattmorgan44 wrote in post #14239169 ![]() This is tempting me to cancel the 24-70 Mark II for the Tamron. VC and $1000 less is very tempting. The sample pictures don't look outstanding to me, but I would like to see some real user reviews. Only problem is I want a general purpose asap lol! Is the Canon Mark II really pushed to July? I'd order it, try it out, and if you like it, keep it Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mattmorgan44 Senior Member 644 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2012 Location: Gold Coast, Australia More info | Apr 10, 2012 04:35 | #742 KenjiS wrote in post #14239386 ![]() I'd order it, try it out, and if you like it, keep it if you hate it, return it and exchange for the 24-70LII Thats what I did with the 15-85.... I wish I could but being in Australia makes this too expensive an exercise. Return shipping is fairly expensive, but it's the 15% tax that prevents me doing it 5D Mark II | 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kechar Goldmember ![]() 1,699 posts Joined Mar 2011 Location: Atlanta, Georgia More info | Apr 10, 2012 09:12 | #743 I think the IQ will be beautiful. I just hope the low light AF speed and accuracy is beautiful also!!! flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony_Stark Shellhead ![]() 4,287 posts Likes: 348 Joined May 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Apr 10, 2012 10:43 | #744 |
Sunthing Productions Member 71 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Apr 10, 2012 10:54 | #745 mattmorgan44 wrote in post #14240211 ![]() I wish I could but being in Australia makes this too expensive an exercise. Return shipping is fairly expensive, but it's the 15% tax that prevents me doing it ![]() The tax isn't refundable? Tony_Stark wrote in post #14241522 ![]() I know I will be reaching with this, but based off the little that we know now, how will the IQ of this lens compare to the 24-105L? I was wondering this as well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
woos Goldmember ![]() 2,224 posts Likes: 24 Joined Dec 2008 Location: a giant bucket More info | Apr 10, 2012 11:20 | #746 Have you noticed this thing has an absolutely silly amount of special glass in it? lol amanathia.zenfolio.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
K6AZ Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Apr 10, 2012 11:22 | #747 Tony_Stark wrote in post #14241522 ![]() I know I will be reaching with this, but based off the little that we know now, how will the IQ of this lens compare to the 24-105L? No way to tell but the bar is high, the IQ of the 24-105 is outstanding for a zoom. This new Tamron lens has to hit the streets and be subjected to some real world testing before we know how it stacks up to the 24-70 and 24-105.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hopefully here in the States , LensRentals will have this lens for rent for testing purposes. Of course alot of folks will still purchase it from Amazon with free delivery and simply pay a return shipping fee back if the lens dont meet their expectations. Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Vixen89 Goldmember ![]() 4,521 posts Likes: 13 Joined Aug 2010 Location: D-Town, TX More info | Apr 10, 2012 11:25 | #749 I still have high hopes for the lens, don't let me down! :O I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
arentol Goldmember 1,305 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Seattle WA More info | Apr 10, 2012 15:31 | #750 K6AZ wrote in post #14241740 ![]() No way to tell but the bar is high, the IQ of the 24-105 is outstanding for a zoom. This new Tamron lens has to hit the streets and be subjected to some real world testing before we know how it stacks up to the 24-70 and 24-105. I don't really consider the bar to be set that high by the 24-105. It is very good for a 4xZoom, but it is also a pretty old design that doesn't hold up well against newer designs. Even the old Tamron 28-75 is arguably as good or better at all shared focal lengths. It is hard to imagine this new Tamron lens would be optically worse than the 28-75. 5D3 | Rokinon 14 f/2.8 | 16-35L II | TS-E 24L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Voigtlander 40 f/2.0 | Σ 50 f/1.4 | MP-E 65 | 70-200 2.8L IS II | Σ 85 f/1.4 | Zeiss 100 f/2 | Σ 120-300 f/2.8 OS | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Fuji X10 | OM-D E-M5 | http://www.mikehjphoto.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is jeffing 559 guests, 235 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |