Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 07 Feb 2012 (Tuesday) 05:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1DX - First official high resolution samples!

 
Ricku
Goldmember
Avatar
1,295 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Bangkok
     
Feb 07, 2012 05:10 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

http://web.canon.jp/im​aging/eosd/samples/eos​1dx/ (external link)

Its about time!


5D II 35L 135L 70-200 2.8L II Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tonyz
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Feb 07, 2012 05:13 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Looks quite good! But whats up with the background noise on the second portrait?

I am looking forward to higher ISO-samples.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tonyz
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Feb 07, 2012 05:41 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Says "coming soon" at the bottom of the page. I hope they reffer to the high-iso samples.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alex_Venom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,624 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
     
Feb 07, 2012 05:46 |  #4

I hope so as well. ISO 1600 looks amazing! ISO 800 is better than my 7D's ISO 100 :p
If ISO 6400 keeps that standard, I'll have to start selling my lunch. I'm soooo getting this camera! :D


Photography is about GEAR and not talent or practice. Practice won't make you a better photographer. Expensive equipment will. =D
"Nobody can buy a scalpel and become a doctor, but anyone can buy a camera and become a photographer."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ricku
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,295 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Bangkok
     
Feb 07, 2012 05:51 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

I am so torn between this camera and the yet unknown 5D3.

I loathe the size and weight of the 1DX, but if the 5D3 turns out to be a "failure" compared to the newly announced D800, I might have to buy this one just to calm my inner gear freak. :cool:


5D II 35L 135L 70-200 2.8L II Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Feb 07, 2012 05:59 |  #6

If this camera can do ISO 6400 better than the 1D4 at a higher resolution (like below), as well as focus in really low light in AI Servo, I will be quite excited to see what can be done with it from some of the folks here on POTN. I am pleased enough with the 1D4 now. I will miss the APS-H sensor format though, so cropping the 1DX down will yield smaller images.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zildjansg
Senior Member
334 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Feb 07, 2012 06:23 |  #7

nice!


1D II
17-40 f4
28-70 2.8
70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
F14fanatic
Junior Member
26 posts
Joined Jan 2003
     
Feb 07, 2012 08:02 |  #8

Not bad- were are the high ISO samples? Looking for 12500+ ISO




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yalemba
Senior Member
Avatar
635 posts
Joined Sep 2003
     
Feb 07, 2012 19:16 |  #9

So far, I have not seen anything particularly impressive to substantiate the marketing hype? Am I missing something here?


Cameras: 1DX, 1Ds Mark III
Lenses: 24 TSE II, 50L, 85L II, 24-70L II, 70-200L II
Flash: 600 EX with STE3, Einstein

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregoryF
Goldmember
Avatar
2,336 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Bella Vista, AR
     
Feb 07, 2012 19:42 |  #10

ISO 1600 definetely looks good.


6D, 5D, 7Dii, Eos R and too many lenses, flashes and aux. gear to list!:cool:
A simple hobby gone horribily wrong

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cputeq007
Senior Member
Avatar
585 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
     
Feb 07, 2012 19:59 |  #11

Color me unimpressed. Detail smearing in the ISO1600 shot and visible chroma noise in the ISO1600 and some of the ISO800 shots.

Judging by the file sizes, though, these look like out of camera JPEGs, in which case they aren't that bad, but a few images shot as RAW and processed would be a bit more appealing IMO.


Flickr (external link)
I own camera stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,153 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 511
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
     
Feb 07, 2012 20:43 as a reply to  @ cputeq007's post |  #12

Notice most shoots took with 135L.
And none of them @ f/2 :cool:


Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LowriderS10
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,170 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Mar 2008
Location: South Korea / Canada
     
Feb 07, 2012 20:59 |  #13

ISO400-1600...not interested. Show me ISO 12k+ and I'll bother looking :)


-=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=- (external link)
-=Facebook=- (external link)
-=Flickr=- (external link)

-=Gear=-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stone ­ 13
Goldmember
Avatar
1,690 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Huntersville, NC
     
Feb 07, 2012 21:03 |  #14

cputeq007 wrote in post #13845438 (external link)
Color me unimpressed. Detail smearing in the ISO1600 shot and visible chroma noise in the ISO1600 and some of the ISO800 shots.

Judging by the file sizes, though, these look like out of camera JPEGs, in which case they aren't that bad, but a few images shot as RAW and processed would be a bit more appealing IMO.

Exactly, these shots are unimpressive to me and while I've got alot less experience than most, I've seen far better from the 5DII.

Just like I said in the 1DX thread, Canon might be trying to display a little honesty by putting out unprocessed files but I don't think that's the right thing to do. You want me to drop 8 large on a camera and this is what you show me?

You need to put your best work out there and a layperson with disposable income could compare these images with the possibly doctored images from the D800 and come to the conclusion that Nikon's 3K body is better than Canon's 8K body.

If I knew nothing about photography but I wanted to spend some chips on a top of the line DSLR, looking at these sample images compared to the D800 images would save me about $4K. Canon needs to step up their game.....


Ken
Fujifilm X100T | 5D III gripped |35L | 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 85 1.8 | 430 EX II | Yongnuo YN-568EX | Billingham 445 | Think Tank UD 60 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Feb 07, 2012 21:06 |  #15

Stone 13 wrote in post #13845773 (external link)
Exactly, these shots are unimpressive to me and while I've got alot less experience than most, I've seen far better from the 5DII.

Just like I said in the 1DX thread, Canon might be trying to display a little honesty by putting out unprocessed files but I don't think that's the right thing to do. You want me to drop 8 large on a camera and this is what you show me?

You need to put your best work out there and a layperson with disposable income could compare these images with the possibly doctored images from the D800 and come to the conclusion that Nikon's 3K body is better than Canon's 8K body.

If I knew nothing about photography but I wanted to spend some chips on a top of the line DSLR, looking at these sample images compared to the D800 images would save me about $4K. Canon needs to step up their game.....

Ken, I cancelled my 1D X preorder. :) The D800 is what I've been looking for and while I do admire the 1D X features, the rez of the D800 and 51 AF points are what I need.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,267 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
1DX - First official high resolution samples!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1401 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.