The 14-24 is practically a bagful of primes - better than most prime lenses in that range! Also, there's a special, extra-large Lee filter holder for it.
Dude! I just saw the Zeiss 15 2.8 rumor!
:p
| POLL: "Nikon D800 or wait" |
Switching now | 104 12.5% |
Waiting for Canon announcement | 296 35.7% |
Loyal Canon fan for life. :) | 430 51.8% |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Mar 07, 2012 23:17 | #841 Shadowblade wrote in post #14047467 The 14-24 is practically a bagful of primes - better than most prime lenses in that range! Also, there's a special, extra-large Lee filter holder for it. Dude! I just saw the Zeiss 15 2.8 rumor!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Mar 07, 2012 23:18 | #842 ilumo wrote in post #14047477 The canon version is just so-so. Maybe the nikon version is better. But the nikon 16-35 vr is nice. I Played around with my coworkers. Love the vr. Come on Ilumo. You joining us or what?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rjx Goldmember 2,670 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Santa Clara, California More info | Mar 07, 2012 23:25 | #843 The 16-35 f/4 VR is a nicer lens than the 17-40, imo. I was going to get the 16-35 f/4 + converter for the 5D2. But the Dark Side is pulling me in ... "It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Mar 07, 2012 23:27 | #844 rjx wrote in post #14047527 The 16-35 f/4 VR is a nicer lens than the 17-40, imo. I was going to get the 16-35 f/4 + converter for the 5D2. But the Dark Side is pulling me in ... ![]() That is fact! Come on man!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
callaesthetics Senior Member 257 posts Likes: 39 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Twin Cities, MN More info | Mar 07, 2012 23:59 | #846 Not sure if anyone has made a size side by side comparison between 36 and 22 MP, but here it is. I've upsize the 5D3's image to 36MP and it still looks sharp and impressive. 5DmkIII, 200 2.8L II, 135L, 100L, 50L, 35L, 40 2.8,17-40L, Tamron 45
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shadowblade Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 08, 2012 00:12 | #847 callaesthetics wrote in post #14047650 Not sure if anyone has made a size side by side comparison between 36 and 22 MP, but here it is. I've upsize the 5D3's image to 36MP and it still looks sharp and impressive. ![]() Any chance you could post 100% crops of the upsized images, alongside D800 shots for comparison, at various ISO settings?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ajp_mirc Member 67 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada More info | Mar 08, 2012 00:29 | #848 Well, Nikon pulled the plug on the D700 despite their announcements to the contrary. Canadian suppliers no longer list the D700 and those that ordered within past few weeks are getting calls cancelling orders. Andy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
callaesthetics Senior Member 257 posts Likes: 39 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Twin Cities, MN More info | Mar 08, 2012 00:30 | #849 Shadowblade wrote in post #14047689 Any chance you could post 100% crops of the upsized images, alongside D800 shots for comparison, at various ISO settings? both image is from the 5D3, i took them from imagingresource.com. i just scaled the size so we can see the difference in size between the two cameras. Last time i check they didn't have any D800 samples yet. 5DmkIII, 200 2.8L II, 135L, 100L, 50L, 35L, 40 2.8,17-40L, Tamron 45
LOG IN TO REPLY |
K6AZ Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 08, 2012 00:31 | #850 ajp_mirc wrote in post #14047741 Well, Nikon pulled the plug on the D700 despite their announcements to the contrary. Canadian suppliers no longer list the D700 and those that ordered within past few weeks are getting calls cancelling orders. Maybe they can concentrate on getting FX lenses out to the major dealers now.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rjx Goldmember 2,670 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Santa Clara, California More info | Mar 08, 2012 01:36 | #851 I think my mind is pretty much made up. Work my a$$ off and by the time the 2nd or 3rd shipments arrive, I'll have the duckets. "It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Mar 08, 2012 01:41 | #852 rjx wrote in post #14047933 I think my mind is pretty much made up. Work my a$$ off and by the time the 2nd or 3rd shipments arrive, I'll have the duckets. ![]() Time to live off plain oats, collect cans, or whatever it takes hehe Seriously!!Ramen noodles is cheap nowadays.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
miniphotog Member 216 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Mar 08, 2012 02:16 | #853 If anyone has a pre-order on the D800 that has decided to go Canon please pm me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dgrPhotos Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 08, 2012 04:20 | #854 This is the photo that disproves the need for expensive glass with the D800. Shot with the 50/1.8G which goes for $220.
Nikon D800 + 50/1.8G
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Mar 08, 2012 05:11 | #855 ^That should convince the 5D fanboys.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1689 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||