If it were the 135 or the 70-200 non-IS, I'd pick the 135, hands down.
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Nov 20, 2005 21:29 | #31 If it were the 135 or the 70-200 non-IS, I'd pick the 135, hands down. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tyger Goldmember 1,295 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: toronto, canada More info | This would be ideal for me Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SolPics Senior Member 709 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Solana Beach, CA More info | Nov 20, 2005 21:43 | #33 I would take the SolPics
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ayotnoms Perfect Anti-Cloning Argument 2,988 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Francisco Bay Area More info | Nov 20, 2005 21:45 | #34 The lenses I'd have to go with are: Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DocFrankenstein Cream of the Crop 12,324 posts Likes: 13 Joined Apr 2004 Location: where the buffalo roam More info | Nov 20, 2005 21:46 | #35 Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cybercoyote Member 32 posts Joined Aug 2005 More info | Nov 20, 2005 21:53 | #36 Canon 100-400L Canon 20D, kit lens, Canon 100-400 L, Canon 100 f2.8 macro, , 580ex flash with BetterBeamer, Minolta IV light meter, Gitzo G2220 tripod, Manfrotto tripod and monopod. And tones of gadgets...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Michaelmjc not cool enough 4,834 posts Joined May 2004 Location: Toronto, Ontario More info | grego wrote: They have a discontinued 17-35 2.8 There's a 16-35 2.8, but the 17-14, is f/4. ![]() 17-14 looks like a nice lens
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | Michaelmjc wrote: 17-14 looks like a nice lens and what is a 17-35? havign a bad night eh ![]() I meant to type 16-35 2.8L Yeah, I thought so. hah, i couldn't even get it right. I saw a 17-14 on ebay for 10 grand! Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Nov 20, 2005 22:06 | #39 Zooms; GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
richardho11 Senior Member 850 posts Joined Jun 2005 More info | Permanent ban35L, 50 f/1.4, 85L, 24-70L and 100-400L https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=2962090&postcount=534
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MaureenSouza Ms. MODERATOR Something Spectacular! More info | Nov 20, 2005 22:07 | #41 I have three that I wouldn't part with: Life is hard...but I just take it one photograph at a time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dandan Senior Member 658 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Chiba, Japan More info | Nov 20, 2005 22:08 | #42 16-35mm 2.8 L 30mm, 50mm, 85mm, and some zooms here and there.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kram obvious its pointless 2,612 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2005 More info | Nov 20, 2005 22:16 | #43 I'm getting pretty content Canon 7D , Canon 6D, 100-400 L, 24-105 F4 L, 50 F1.4, Tokina 12-24 F4, Kenko Teleplus Pro DG 1.4X Extender
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jesusdelallata Senior Member 633 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Brownsville, TX More info | Nov 20, 2005 22:22 | #44 I am happy with my lenses (see my sig below). However, I would do the following: Jesus De La Llata
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Nov 20, 2005 23:00 | #45 See my signature. I would like to add a wide angle. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1314 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||