Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 09 Feb 2012 (Thursday) 16:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

For weddings, what lens make you say "wow" on cropped bodies?

 
Joelh085
Member
Avatar
105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2009
     
Feb 09, 2012 16:42 |  #1

Hello friends,

I've got a couple of questions. I'm looking for a lens that makes you say "wow" on a cropped body. The canon 85 f1.2 on a full frame body is a special combination. I have also seen the Nikon D3's with the 85 and I'm always pleased with the sharpness and the bokeh it delivers.
Big fan of this guy's work http://meninenuotrauka​.lt …ing/2011/brigit​a_vincent/ (external link)

Can the canon 50mm f1.2 deliver these kind of images on a cropped body or is it the larger sensors that make the images?

Apart from that question, is there any lens that makes you say wow other than the 70-200 MKII? I've shot with this lens but I have to get way back in order to see the "wow" factor on portraits. Looking for something I can stand closer to my subjects for weddings.


Graphic Designer / Photographer / Illustrator
Twinbliss.com (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Feb 09, 2012 16:48 |  #2

Wow depends on many factors that make an image appealing, and some of those factors are related to depth of field control that only full frame cameras (or larger formats) can produce. Others are not and can be done without the depth of field effect of full frame. It's ultimately not about whether it's possible to take great photos, but rather about under what circumstances,under how many conditions, and in how many ways it can be done. More versatility means access to more factors of appealing images.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Feb 09, 2012 16:51 |  #3

For a crop there is Nothing better than a 17-55. I also liked the 35L on a crop. Lots of people have had great copies of the sigma 30mm but unfortunately,, I was not one of those lucky ones

Crops my choice would be

17-55
10-22
70-200 F/2.8IS


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snakeman55
Goldmember
Avatar
1,223 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Baltimore, Md
     
Feb 09, 2012 17:28 |  #4

Sigma 30 1.4 (external link)

and

Canon 10-22 (external link)

The Tamron 17-50 2.8 (external link) is underrated too.


-Adam
Wedding Photographers in Maryland (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PMCphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
     
Feb 09, 2012 20:53 |  #5

70-200 f/2.8. Easy.


Twitter (external link)
Hobart Wedding Photography (external link)
I have some camera stuff. Here it is.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Feb 09, 2012 20:57 |  #6

The 200L F2 IS that I used to own made me say WOW. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PMCphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
     
Feb 09, 2012 21:00 |  #7

Whoa. A 200 f2 would be wow inducing for sure.


Twitter (external link)
Hobart Wedding Photography (external link)
I have some camera stuff. Here it is.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snakeman55
Goldmember
Avatar
1,223 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Baltimore, Md
     
Feb 10, 2012 04:43 as a reply to  @ PMCphotography's post |  #8

200 F/2 IS sounds awesome, but effective 320mm sounds unwieldy for almost all wedding situations.


-Adam
Wedding Photographers in Maryland (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Feb 10, 2012 08:13 |  #9

snakeman55 wrote in post #13860943 (external link)
200 F/2 IS sounds awesome, but effective 320mm sounds unwieldy for almost all wedding situations.


Sure would be good from the balcony of a catholic church wedding:lol:

Those expensive primes are insanely awesome but for the life of me, do not understand why people buy them, specially with the 135L being as good as it is. Maybe the concert guys or shooters that need reach in that type of lighting, but that sure is a select few isn't it.....I tend to think its about bragging rights for photographers more than anything else


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jkim05
Member
127 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Rockville/College Park, MD
     
Feb 10, 2012 08:25 |  #10

The 200mm f/2 has numerous sports photography applications where you need fast shutter speeds.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmb
Member
117 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 10, 2012 10:26 |  #11

jkim05 wrote in post #13861503 (external link)
The 200mm f/2 has numerous sports photography applications where you need fast shutter speeds.

.. during weddings? :confused:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JakAHearts
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,746 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
     
Feb 10, 2012 10:48 |  #12

mmb wrote in post #13862214 (external link)
.. during weddings? :confused:

Sure, for the fights.


Shane
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBrick3
Goldmember
Avatar
2,094 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: College Park, Md.
     
Feb 10, 2012 10:51 |  #13

200 f/2 is great for portraits, too. But the 135L on a crop can be a bit rough, so I agree the 200L is asking for trouble.


1D III 5D II 5D | 580 EX II x 2
17-40L | 35L | 100L | 70-200 II | 17-35 f/2.8-f/4
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Feb 10, 2012 13:02 |  #14

I know Nick can speak for himself, but from our conversations together I dont believe he used the 200 f2 much for weddings. He did a lot of stage/performance photography before (where the 200 has great uses) but sold it when he started doing weddings.


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NYC2BGI
Senior Member
Avatar
846 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
     
Feb 10, 2012 13:34 |  #15

70-200 f2.8 IS. That lens is great on any Canon D-SLR.


Canon 5D3, 5D2, 40D
EF 50mm f1.4, EF 85mm f1.8,
Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L
http://www.facebook.co​m/HightechPix (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,471 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
For weddings, what lens make you say "wow" on cropped bodies?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1777 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.