Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 10 Feb 2012 (Friday) 07:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

JPEG conversion

 
TRACER
Member
96 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 10, 2012 07:08 |  #1

After working with a RAW image and then saving it in JPEG format, what steps/settings do I need to take to keep the image as sharp as possible for viewing in JPEG? I know that some quality is sacrificed when converting to JPEG, but is there anything I can do to keep the colors, tones, sharpness, etc. when converting to JPEG? I remember reading someone saying that the smaller you make the JPEG the more pixels that are removed, thus lowering the quality of the image. Anythingn else?
Any information is appreciated.
Thanks,
Randall


Randall
7D,Tamron 70-300 F/4-5.6 Di VC USD; Canon 15-85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,721 posts
Likes: 4046
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Feb 10, 2012 07:21 |  #2

Your mixing a few things up I think. When you re-size, you loose pixels no matter what format you are saving as, compressed or not. The smaller you re-size, the more pixels are lost. However, saving as a jpeg does not necessarily mean that you have to re-size the image.

The second part is the compression. The more you compress an image, the more visible jpeg artifacts become. Your not loosing pixels exactly, but you are loosing the color information for those individual pixels. This is going to happen no matter what when you convert to jpeg from raw. Jpeg only has 8 bits per color where your raw file has 12/14 depending on camera.So automatically some color information will disappear. When you lower the compression factor ore of that color info is lost.

If you want the highest quality jpeg possible, don't resize and set compression to the minimum amount. The files will be much bigger, bit the quality will be highest.

If you want to experiment, save a file at the maximum compression (0 for photoshop) and re-open the file. You'll see the effect that compression has really easily.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TRACER
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
96 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 10, 2012 10:49 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #3

Thanks. This makes it a bit more clear.


Randall
7D,Tamron 70-300 F/4-5.6 Di VC USD; Canon 15-85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Preeb
Goldmember
Avatar
2,663 posts
Gallery: 150 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1258
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Logan County, CO
     
Feb 10, 2012 10:58 as a reply to  @ TRACER's post |  #4

When I convert from RAW to jpeg, I save it at the maximum resolution. Then if I need to upload it online, I will resize the large jpeg, upload to a hosting site, then usually discard the resized image from my system. I can always resize it again if I need to, so there's no sense in keeping it on my drive in different sizes which are only needed for certain websites.


Rick
6D Mark II - EF 17-40 f4 L -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 10, 2012 13:45 |  #5

TRACER wrote in post #13861263 (external link)
After working with a RAW image and then saving it in JPEG format, what steps/settings do I need to take to keep the image as sharp as possible for viewing in JPEG? I know that some quality is sacrificed when converting to JPEG, but is there anything I can do to keep the colors, tones, sharpness, etc. when converting to JPEG? I remember reading someone saying that the smaller you make the JPEG the more pixels that are removed, thus lowering the quality of the image. Anythingn else?
Any information is appreciated.
Thanks,
Randall

When you convert a Raw image to a jpeg, a number of "settings" are "burned in" to the jpeg. Among those settings is the "color space" that your Raw processor is "set" to.

When you view a jpeg in software other than the Raw processor, you will likely not be using software that is "color aware" and so many things will appear "off" when viewing the image.

The safe color space to have your Raw processing software set to is sRGB.

If all this sounds like a foreign language to you, then speak up because you need to learn some basics!

Check out these threads from the "stickies" here:

Color Management

Color Problems


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

734 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
JPEG conversion
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
634 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.