Bold letters
Still 2400 is a whopper
Jericobot Cream of the Crop  5,128 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: preppingforthetrumpets More info | Feb 20, 2012 12:59 | #31 Bold letters α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dtufino Goldmember 4,040 posts Likes: 605 Joined Apr 2006 Location: New York Gritty More info | LMAO Dear Canon...... Your price is too high on the 24-70 f/2.8 lens.... It has no IS, and basically the same exact lens as the Version 1... the only thing you threw in was a cool looking lens hood....... -David T.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
spear Senior Member 559 posts Joined Dec 2007 More info | Wow I must have been living under a rock !!! When did this lens come out? And why on earth no IS ... that was the whole point of the wait !!! Canon 40D, 5DII, 5DIII, G9,G11,S100,G1X, Canon lenses 600mmL f/4 ,24mm-105L f/4, 16-35L II f/2.8, 70-200L II f/2.8, EF 100mm f/2.8, EF 50 f/1.4,17-85 EFS, 10-22 EFS, 580 EX, 2x 580 EXII, 270EX,STE2, 1. 4x Converter, 2.0x Converter. Nikon 800E w/Nikkor 24-70
LOG IN TO REPLY |
toastyphoto Senior Member  302 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Feb 21, 2012 06:06 | #34 spear wrote in post #13934283  Wow I must have been living under a rock !!! When did this lens come out? And why on earth no IS ... that was the whole point of the wait !!! I still think they're going to announce an IS version with a forthcoming body like the 5DX/5D Mark III. It's not so crazy. Both IS versions of the 70-200 f/2.8 and f/4 were released after the initial release of a non-IS version. 5D II | 24-70 2.8L II | 16-35 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 50 1.4 | 430 EX II x2 | PW ControlTL
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mayerk Senior Member  426 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Bright, Indiana More info | Feb 21, 2012 07:13 | #35 toastyphoto wrote in post #13934745 I still think they're going to announce an IS version with a forthcoming body like the 5DX/5D Mark III. It's not so crazy. Both IS versions of the 70-200 f/2.8 and f/4 were released after the initial release of a non-IS version. At this point an IS version would run around 3k. I couldn't imagine spending that. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dtufino Goldmember 4,040 posts Likes: 605 Joined Apr 2006 Location: New York Gritty More info | Feb 21, 2012 07:51 | #36 mayerk wrote in post #13934905 At this point an IS version would run around 3k. I couldn't imagine spending that. Exactly... -David T.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
toastyphoto Senior Member 302 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Feb 21, 2012 08:24 | #37 mayerk wrote in post #13934905 At this point an IS version would run around 3k. I couldn't imagine spending that. Never said it would be cheap 5D II | 24-70 2.8L II | 16-35 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 50 1.4 | 430 EX II x2 | PW ControlTL
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mayerk Senior Member 426 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Bright, Indiana More info | Feb 21, 2012 08:41 | #38 Let's face it.....there's nothing cheap at all in photography. Even the "inexpensive" lenses aren't cheap. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 541 guests, 152 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
