Phased Member 180 posts Likes: 35 Joined May 2010 Location: Charlotte More info | Feb 11, 2012 14:09 | #1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 11, 2012 21:56 | #2 Feedback on this please
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 11, 2012 23:13 | #3 Most of them seem far away. Where exactly were you situated and what focal length lens were you using?They're uploaded at such a small size that even a grainy photo is going to look ok at that size so as far as quality, that's hard to say. In #6 his face is totally blocked, that gets deleted in camera for me personally. 3, 4 and 5 are the only ones that don't get deleted in camera for me. There are things about each of the others that I don't like. #1 has blur on the extremities. #2 is just too far away and from the wrong side. #3 could be cropped to about the players numbers who are on the ground. You've already cut off his foot so there's no reason to stop there, makes it closer to the action as well. #4, same thing, needs a cropping. #5, too much floor below defender's shoes, crop it right up to them.#7 blur again, and it has extreme horizon problems. He's running uphill. I hope you'll take the critique in the spirit it was given. I'm not trying to be an ******* but these are just my honest thoughts on them. As far as cropping, don't be afraid to cut stuff off. Sports photography has a little more leeway as far as that kind of thing is concerned because we don't have the ability to pose the subject so we get what we get sometimes. http://emjfotografi.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 12, 2012 01:04 | #4 Thanks a lot this was about my third game I think? Thanks for the tips though they are really going to help. For some of them I was taking pictures from the baseline but for about 3 others I was back near the bleachers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bubbygator I can't tell the difference 1,477 posts Gallery: 1 photo Likes: 63 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles More info | I think your capture of the action is quite good. There's some PP which might make your subjects "stand out". Do a search on DC Fan's posts - he's a wizard at this. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 12, 2012 14:59 | #6 I did, I learned a few things. But one thing that I kind of have to sacrifice is my shutter speed b/c my 40D s ISO only gets up to 1600
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mattyv53 Member 118 posts Joined Jun 2009 More info | Feb 13, 2012 10:07 | #7 I used to shoot with a 40D, and with ISO expansion turned on in custom functions you can get up to ISO 3200. That will with your shutter speed, but you will have to deal with the noise as the 40d can get a little noisy at ISO 3200. Canon 1D Mark IV / 5D mark iii / 7D mark ii / 6D / Canon 300mm f2.8 IS L / Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS ii L / Canon 24-70 f2.8 ii L / Canon 17-40mm f4 L / Canon 24-105mm f4 L / Sigma 10mm f2.8 fisheye / Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 / Canon Speedlite 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 16, 2012 17:58 | #8 New images up
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gromeo Senior Member 981 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 Location: Orlando, FL More info | Feb 16, 2012 20:26 | #9 I will be shooting the ECU vs UCF game this weekend. It's already been mentioned on shooting tight and cropping tight. As you shoot more you will start to see when to shoot tight, shoot even tighter and when to shoot wide, all this is subjective anyways in what you like, how you want to tell the story and what your client wants. Just keep shooting and learning.
This was already shot tight but I cropped even tighter.
This shot I could have gone either way crop it tight or keep it wide, I decided to go wide because it showed the coach in the BG
Nikon D4 and 60 2.8D Micro, 24-70 2.8G, 70-200 2.8G VRII, 200-400 VRII, SB800, SB600, Pocket Wizards, 4x WL-1600, Quantum Turbo 2x2, Sekonic 358 meter, TT AS, Takeoff, Belt System
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RustyHammer Senior Member 685 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2011 Location: New Orleans / New York More info | Feb 16, 2012 22:29 | #10 |
Feb 19, 2012 16:14 | #11 Thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WolfmanPhoto Member 42 posts Joined Feb 2012 Location: North Carolina More info | The main problem I have of these photos, is that the subject is EZU.....And yes, I am biased (Go State) 7D | 1D MarkII | 40D | 400mm f/2.8L | 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L | 70-200mm f/2.8L | 16-35mm f/2.8L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2012 17:21 | #13 Lol
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gutterscum Goldmember More info | Feb 20, 2012 04:24 | #14 Second series are much better. Canon 60D gripped,70-200 2.8 IS, Tokina 11-16 f2.8, Tamron 15-55 2.8 non VG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Feb 21, 2012 04:25 | #15 Go Pirates !
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1212 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||