Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 11 Feb 2012 (Saturday) 23:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

The Matrix Allstars Cheerleading

 
FreezeFramePhto
Goldmember
1,130 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
     
Feb 11, 2012 23:01 |  #1

I really enjoy shooting this particular gym. Kind of fell into it. Now I've been honored to have many of my photos plastered on the homepage of their website.

Trying to keep the ISO down to maintain a cleaner file. Some of these I end up cropping pretty tight, or the parents crop them tightly when they purchase them.

From the other thread I was in...

CliffordPhotography wrote in post #13870514 (external link)
I shoot Cheerleading at ISO 2000 1/320th. Give or take a stop of either.

Aressem wrote in post #13870745 (external link)
Way too slow of a shutter speed imho. Do you have examples?


www.freezeframe.photo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sfinkernagel
Senior Member
464 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 141
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Pocono Lake, PA USA
     
Feb 12, 2012 07:46 |  #2

There's the answer to your motion/shutter speed question- These are nice shots, in that there is no motion blur, but you capturing moments where the girls are not moving significantly. I came here from the other thread, and had you had the same kind of shot, with girls spinning through the air, I think there would have been some blur.

I'm not criticizing- I think there is a lesson to be learned here. If conditions dictate a slower shutter speed as a result of lighting, then there are still ways to capture great shots. Knowing how and why things work seems to be the key, then shooting within those limitations.

Thanks for posting!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FreezeFramePhto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,130 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
     
Feb 12, 2012 08:50 |  #3

These girls are moving very quickly when they're flying. Especially the one in White. I'll grab some of the stunts, as I have those also.

Thanks


www.freezeframe.photo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aressem
Goldmember
Avatar
4,368 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 529
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Feb 12, 2012 12:49 |  #4

CliffordPhotography wrote in post #13872962 (external link)
These girls are moving very quickly when they're flying. Especially the one in White. I'll grab some of the stunts, as I have those also.

Thanks

It's not rocket science. 1/320 will work great for shots like these but it ain't gonna cut it for real action shots where the girls are being tossed in the air and what not.


Ryan Mackay WEBSITE (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link) | GEAR LIST | Buy & Sell Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FreezeFramePhto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,130 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
     
Feb 13, 2012 08:02 |  #5

Very true. I have the higher shutter speed higher ISO, but I think we could all agree, the settings he had in his camera where way too high.


www.freezeframe.photo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aressem
Goldmember
Avatar
4,368 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 529
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Feb 13, 2012 08:56 |  #6

CliffordPhotography wrote in post #13877889 (external link)
Very true. I have the higher shutter speed higher ISO, but I think we could all agree, the settings he had in his camera where way too high.

If you were referring to Chartist10, he was using a $5000 camera. ISO 8000 is fine. Regardless, as a sports photographer, if I had to choose: blurry shot, noisy shot or no shot at all, it would be the noisy shot which I would have confidence in knowing that I nailed it.


Ryan Mackay WEBSITE (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link) | GEAR LIST | Buy & Sell Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fligi7
Senior Member
968 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2010
     
Feb 13, 2012 16:50 |  #7

You should be able to hit 1/640 wide open at ISO 1600 in some of these shots with no problem, and then you can capture action shots rather than relying on moments with lesser movement.

I think the better order of shooting indoors is to first set your lens wide open and select the minimum shutter speed you know you'll need to freeze action (most likely 1/640 in most sports). Then, look at your ISO and compensate accordingly. You've got it a bit backwards if you're first setting your ISO to avoid grainy shots and then attempting to set the shutter speed. The 50D has little issue shooting ISO 1600 (which looks like the minimum for this venue, sans some of the closer shots with direct lighting) with minimal noise cleanup in PP. You've got the gear to handle it, don't be afraid to use it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FreezeFramePhto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,130 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
     
Feb 16, 2012 11:07 |  #8

Fligi7 wrote in post #13891624 (external link)
You should be able to hit 1/640 wide open at ISO 1600 in some of these shots with no problem, and then you can capture action shots rather than relying on moments with lesser movement.

I think the better order of shooting indoors is to first set your lens wide open and select the minimum shutter speed you know you'll need to freeze action (most likely 1/640 in most sports). Then, look at your ISO and compensate accordingly. You've got it a bit backwards if you're first setting your ISO to avoid grainy shots and then attempting to set the shutter speed. The 50D has little issue shooting ISO 1600 (which looks like the minimum for this venue, sans some of the closer shots with direct lighting) with minimal noise cleanup in PP. You've got the gear to handle it, don't be afraid to use it.

I'll try that at the next competition. Typically I would shoot in AV and set the camera at 2.8. Just lately I switched over to manual. Everyone of these is different, one problem I had at a venue was working against event photographers 8 alienbees. Made me want to pull a trigger out and start using them also. That would have pissed someone off.


www.freezeframe.photo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FreezeFramePhto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,130 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
     
Feb 24, 2012 20:10 |  #9

I'll be trying this shutter speed this weekend. I just noticed your "relying on moments" comment. Thats funny because they're hauling ass, Im constantly moving to the next athlete because they're gone.


www.freezeframe.photo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RSBurton
Member
192 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Chicago Area
     
Mar 03, 2012 21:41 |  #10

I shoot quite a bit of Cheer for my daughters gym, at 1/320 you will get blur on their tumbling passes and jumps. Got any samples you shot at 1/320 where you have caught someone throwing a full or back handspring?


7D / 28-135, Canon 50mm f/1.8, 85mm, Canon 24-70mm 2.8 I, 50-250mm IS, (3) 600ex-rt

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,512 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
The Matrix Allstars Cheerleading
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1369 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.