In addition to a quality polarizer, I'd recommend two ND filters...3-stop and 6-stop. These will cover you for most situations that you'll encounter.
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | In addition to a quality polarizer, I'd recommend two ND filters...3-stop and 6-stop. These will cover you for most situations that you'll encounter. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
henryp Senior Member 421 posts Likes: 78 Joined Jun 2004 Location: New York, NY More info | Feb 23, 2012 12:46 | #17 JerInCanada wrote in post #13935444 Man that BHphoto is scary. I am glad I stayed out of the lens area! ![]() Only the first time. Don't be a stranger and you'll be leading guided tours soon enough.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 03, 2012 22:09 | #18 JerInCanada wrote in post #13935444 I went with B+W 77mm (COATED) #110 (ND 3.0) FILTER - I have that. One thing I should warn you about it that it does leave a bit of a color cast, but it's very even and correctable with WB adjustment. So I would strongly advise shooting raw. Edward Jenner
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | Mar 04, 2012 07:59 | #19 JersFocus wrote in post #13935444 I went with B+W 77mm (COATED) #110 (ND 3.0) FILTER - BW110C7 (125$), and Hoya 77mm FILTER INTRDCTN KIT (UV/CP/WARM) - HOFIK77 (55$). That should be a good start, thanks for the help. Didnt want to spend to much until I know I am getting things I need. Also got a few step up rings...52mm-77mm, 67mm-77mm etc, some hoods and a 7 million dollar home camera bag...Man that BHphoto is scary. I am glad I stayed out of the lens area! ![]() Well, the ND 110 is a very good filter, but if its your only ND filter, you may find that it will be too much at times. The "silky water" effect is very easy to do (as well as blow out the water) and only requires a shutter speed in the 1/2-second range or longer (also depends on how fast the water is moving). Having a 10-stop as a "one size fits all" may not be the best in all situations. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JersFocus THREAD STARTER Senior Member 572 posts Joined Dec 2011 Location: Same pale blue dot as you. More info |
wagaboo Senior Member More info | Mar 30, 2012 10:32 | #21 I bought a Hoya ND400 58mm for 50 bucks and I'm quite happy with it https://www.flickriver.com/photos/tc99206/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JersFocus THREAD STARTER Senior Member 572 posts Joined Dec 2011 Location: Same pale blue dot as you. More info | Apr 16, 2012 02:00 | #22 argyle wrote in post #13936514 In addition to a quality polarizer, I'd recommend two ND filters...3-stop and 6-stop. These will cover you for most situations that you'll encounter. When you say ND .6 do you mean... Graduated Neutral Density filters? Gear & Feedback
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2012 02:08 | #23 JersFocus wrote in post #14273118 When you say ND .6 do you mean... Graduated Neutral Density filters? http://www.bhphotovideo.com …ated_Neutral_Density.html Grad ND's are good when one section of the scene is bright then the other. They can be useful for waterfall shots if you have a bright sky that is a couple stops brighter then the waterfall its self. However you will still want sold ND filters that will cover the whole scene as those will be the most useful at cutting light across the whole scene.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
henryp Senior Member 421 posts Likes: 78 Joined Jun 2004 Location: New York, NY More info | Apr 16, 2012 08:52 | #24 gremlin75 wrote in post #14273138 Grad ND's are good when one section of the scene is bright then the other. They can be useful for waterfall shots if you have a bright sky that is a couple stops brighter then the waterfall its self. If you're considering grad ND filters I urge you to buy rectangular filters, not round screw-in filters. Screw-ins are easier to use but the grad is always at the "equator," dead center in the frame, which is usually not the best place for optimum image composition.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoeRavenstein Goldmember 2,338 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: E Tx More info | Apr 16, 2012 11:50 | #25 A variable neutral density filter will do what you want to achieve. Canon 60D,18-55mm,55-250mm,50mm compact macro, AF ext tubes. Sigma 8-16mm uwa, 18-250mm, 85mm F1.4, 150-500mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JersFocus THREAD STARTER Senior Member 572 posts Joined Dec 2011 Location: Same pale blue dot as you. More info | Apr 16, 2012 15:23 | #26 henryp wrote in post #14274029 If you're considering grad ND filters I urge you to buy rectangular filters, not round screw-in filters. Screw-ins are easier to use but the grad is always at the "equator," dead center in the frame, which is usually not the best place for optimum image composition. With rectangular grad filters you have enough leeway to set the "equator" at the best spot for each individual image.
Gear & Feedback
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RockyRhode Goldmember 1,416 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2011 Location: Sacramento More info |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2764 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||