Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 14 Feb 2012 (Tuesday) 11:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Recommendations for a good filter... version: waterfalls

 
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Feb 21, 2012 11:51 as a reply to  @ post 13935444 |  #16

In addition to a quality polarizer, I'd recommend two ND filters...3-stop and 6-stop. These will cover you for most situations that you'll encounter.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
henryp
Senior Member
Avatar
421 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Jun 2004
Location: New York, NY
     
Feb 23, 2012 12:46 |  #17

JerInCanada wrote in post #13935444 (external link)
Man that BHphoto is scary. I am glad I stayed out of the lens area!:shock:

Only the first time. Don't be a stranger and you'll be leading guided tours soon enough. :-)


Henry Posner (external link)
B&H Photo-Video (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,867 posts
Gallery: 98 photos
Likes: 1136
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
     
Mar 03, 2012 22:09 |  #18

JerInCanada wrote in post #13935444 (external link)
I went with B+W 77mm (COATED) #110 (ND 3.0) FILTER -

I have that. One thing I should warn you about it that it does leave a bit of a color cast, but it's very even and correctable with WB adjustment. So I would strongly advise shooting raw.

One you make a WB adjustment though, the colors should look natural - no strange relative shifts.


Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Mar 04, 2012 07:59 |  #19

JersFocus wrote in post #13935444 (external link)
I went with B+W 77mm (COATED) #110 (ND 3.0) FILTER - BW110C7 (125$), and Hoya 77mm FILTER INTRDCTN KIT (UV/CP/WARM) - HOFIK77 (55$).

That should be a good start, thanks for the help. Didnt want to spend to much until I know I am getting things I need. Also got a few step up rings...52mm-77mm, 67mm-77mm etc, some hoods and a 7 million dollar home camera bag...Man that BHphoto is scary. I am glad I stayed out of the lens area!:shock:

Well, the ND 110 is a very good filter, but if its your only ND filter, you may find that it will be too much at times. The "silky water" effect is very easy to do (as well as blow out the water) and only requires a shutter speed in the 1/2-second range or longer (also depends on how fast the water is moving). Having a 10-stop as a "one size fits all" may not be the best in all situations.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JersFocus
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
572 posts
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Same pale blue dot as you.
     
Mar 28, 2012 02:25 as a reply to  @ argyle's post |  #20

Thanks for the help folks!


Gear & Feedback
Go Oilers!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wagaboo
Senior Member
Avatar
447 posts
Gallery: 59 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1599
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Spokane Washington
     
Mar 30, 2012 10:32 |  #21

I bought a Hoya ND400 58mm for 50 bucks and I'm quite happy with it :)


https://www.flickriver​.com/photos/tc99206/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JersFocus
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
572 posts
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Same pale blue dot as you.
     
Apr 16, 2012 02:00 |  #22

argyle wrote in post #13936514 (external link)
In addition to a quality polarizer, I'd recommend two ND filters...3-stop and 6-stop. These will cover you for most situations that you'll encounter.

When you say ND .6 do you mean... Graduated Neutral Density filters?

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …ated_Neutral_De​nsity.html (external link)


Gear & Feedback
Go Oilers!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Apr 16, 2012 02:08 |  #23

JersFocus wrote in post #14273118 (external link)
When you say ND .6 do you mean... Graduated Neutral Density filters?

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …ated_Neutral_De​nsity.html (external link)

Grad ND's are good when one section of the scene is bright then the other. They can be useful for waterfall shots if you have a bright sky that is a couple stops brighter then the waterfall its self. However you will still want sold ND filters that will cover the whole scene as those will be the most useful at cutting light across the whole scene.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
henryp
Senior Member
Avatar
421 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Jun 2004
Location: New York, NY
     
Apr 16, 2012 08:52 |  #24

gremlin75 wrote in post #14273138 (external link)
Grad ND's are good when one section of the scene is bright then the other. They can be useful for waterfall shots if you have a bright sky that is a couple stops brighter then the waterfall its self.

If you're considering grad ND filters I urge you to buy rectangular filters, not round screw-in filters. Screw-ins are easier to use but the grad is always at the "equator," dead center in the frame, which is usually not the best place for optimum image composition.

With rectangular grad filters you have enough leeway to set the "equator" at the best spot for each individual image.


Henry Posner (external link)
B&H Photo-Video (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Joe ­ Ravenstein
Goldmember
2,338 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2010
Location: E Tx
     
Apr 16, 2012 11:50 |  #25

A variable neutral density filter will do what you want to achieve.


Canon 60D,18-55mm,55-250mm,50mm compact macro, AF ext tubes. Sigma 8-16mm uwa, 18-250mm, 85mm F1.4, 150-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JersFocus
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
572 posts
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Same pale blue dot as you.
     
Apr 16, 2012 15:23 |  #26

henryp wrote in post #14274029 (external link)
If you're considering grad ND filters I urge you to buy rectangular filters, not round screw-in filters. Screw-ins are easier to use but the grad is always at the "equator," dead center in the frame, which is usually not the best place for optimum image composition.

With rectangular grad filters you have enough leeway to set the "equator" at the best spot for each individual image.


Thanks I went with the P series holder and a couple Hitech hard filters.

BTW when I said the site was scary, its because of all the money I can/will/ want to spend there, dont want to get a divorce you know :lol:;).

I also love the realistic shipping charges to Canada, and I always get my order in 5 or 6 days. I laugh at places that charge $68 s&h for a $5 item to Canada... at least you guys did your homework.

Cheers.


Gear & Feedback
Go Oilers!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rocky ­ Rhode
Goldmember
Avatar
1,416 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Sacramento
     
Apr 17, 2012 10:58 as a reply to  @ JersFocus's post |  #27

Just placed an order for the Marumi DHG Super Circular Polarizer 77mm; hope all the reviews are accurate both here and other various websites.

<<$75.00 vs $155.00 is a big difference>>


GEAR LIST Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,025 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Recommendations for a good filter... version: waterfalls
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2764 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.