Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
Thread started 14 Feb 2012 (Tuesday) 16:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why does the G series look so military?

 
soupcxan
Member
40 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Houston, TX
     
Feb 14, 2012 16:09 |  #1

The G1x continues the G-series trend of uber-military design. All black, extremely boxy, sharp edges, knurled controls, etc. Is there a reason for this?


D800, 28/1.8G, 50/1.8G, 85/1.8G, 24-85VR, Rokinon 14/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xhack
Goldmember
Avatar
1,283 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Edinburgh, Lothian
     
Feb 14, 2012 16:24 |  #2

I have to say I've never thought the G series as "military", über or otherwise. Just a case of form following function. And why would knobs not be knurled; grippy is good.


~ Wallace
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Numenorean
Cream of the Crop
5,013 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Feb 2011
     
Feb 14, 2012 16:28 |  #3

It isn't. It's a good design. The little tiny mini camera things suck...can't hold them in your hand.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsmotril
Goldmember
Avatar
2,543 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 402
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Austin TX
     
Feb 14, 2012 16:37 |  #4

I don't think of it as military, but more traditional along the lines of 1870-80's Canon, Nikon, and Ricoh range finder cameras.


Gear List
Galleries: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/smopho/ (external link) --- http://billsmotrilla.z​enfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kevan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,125 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Easton, MD
     
Feb 14, 2012 16:38 |  #5

Yeah, don't fool with a basic design that has proven to work. People have always been drawn to the rangefinder style of camera, even if the definition is stretched a bit with the G. They can be considered a bit retro in fashion, but when it comes down to it, its all form follows function.


kevan's lens (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Feb 14, 2012 16:40 |  #6

The design characteristics listed are common to many, many cameras.

"Black" is not a military characteristic. Green or brown are always better than black in a military environment.

"Boxy" and "sharp edges" are almost always the shape of things when function is more important than form.

"knurled controls" are always a good idea. Last Sunday I was out taking pictures in freezing temps with the wind blowing. Given a choice between "fingers completely numb from the cold" or "fingers mostly numb and with gloves in the way" knurled controls were mandatory, not optional.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
soupcxan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
40 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Houston, TX
     
Feb 14, 2012 19:26 |  #7

I'm not making a value judgement, just an observation. The G1x reminds me much more of a glock or H&K with the angular design versus the S95 which has more rounded edges, even though both the G1x and S95 are black and essentially rectangles. No doubt the knurled edges are practical, but there are pro cameras that I'm sure get used in very extreme environments and still have less knurling on them...it does seem like Canon has emphasized that style.


D800, 28/1.8G, 50/1.8G, 85/1.8G, 24-85VR, Rokinon 14/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
Goldmember
1,958 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Feb 14, 2012 19:46 |  #8

bsmotril wrote in post #13898010 (external link)
I don't think of it as military, but more traditional along the lines of 1870-80's Canon, Nikon, and Ricoh range finder cameras.

man, that's old.


A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
denncald
Goldmember
2,115 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 30
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Marquette, MI, USA
     
Feb 14, 2012 20:38 as a reply to  @ Higgs Boson's post |  #9

It must be the military design that made this man take his to "work".

http://forums.dpreview​.com …rum=1010&messag​e=40542479 (external link)

http://forums.dpreview​.com …rum=1010&messag​e=40616155 (external link)

Dennis




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryanshoots
Senior Member
344 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2010
     
Feb 14, 2012 22:44 |  #10

Kevan wrote in post #13898016 (external link)
Yeah, don't fool with a basic design that has proven to work. People have always been drawn to the rangefinder style of camera, even if the definition is stretched a bit with the G. They can be considered a bit retro in fashion, but when it comes down to it, its all form follows function.

Yes, it's not that the G body quit advancing, rather I think it quit declining in usability as most point and shoots have. Many are like trying to hold a bar of soap and put everything in the menus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryanshoots
Senior Member
344 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2010
     
Feb 14, 2012 22:45 |  #11

krb wrote in post #13898025 (external link)
"Black" is not a military characteristic. Green or brown are always better than black in a military environment.

Not in Hollywood :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,697 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Why does the G series look so military?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1687 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.