Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 16 Feb 2012 (Thursday) 15:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Cornstalks in snow..

 
Huntbear
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Washington State
     
Feb 16, 2012 15:01 |  #1

I would love to get some feedback on this picture. I have looked at it on two different monitors, and I get the feeling it is a lot more blown out than I think it is....


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

009 Corn stalks in snow - small (external link) by Bear Conceptions (external link), on Flickr



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 466
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Feb 16, 2012 16:55 |  #2

Aah...what does your histogram show?


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Too ­ Distracted
Senior Member
Avatar
250 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Feb 16, 2012 21:28 |  #3

On my monitor, it doesn't seem like any clipped highlights.
The giant watermark is kind of distracting though... just FYI.


Gripped 5D Mark III, back-up gripped 5D Mark II, 17-40L, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 85 1.2L, 580EXii, AB1600's, FlexTT1, FlexTT5's,  Mac Pro, a buncha other stuff...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Huntbear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Washington State
     
Feb 16, 2012 22:20 |  #4

Too Distracted wrote in post #13911854 (external link)
On my monitor, it doesn't seem like any clipped highlights.
The giant watermark is kind of distracting though... just FYI.


Thank you for the input. The watermark is there to make a point. I had a couple of very nice wildlife pics stolen and actually posted on a hunting website that I was a member of.. lol.... So I sent the guy a message and told him he could have all the prints off my flickr he wanted but he would have to deal with my signature to show everyone who actually took the photos... (he was banned from the site as well..)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Too ­ Distracted
Senior Member
Avatar
250 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Feb 16, 2012 22:45 |  #5

Oh I totally understand the reasoning. I'd just hate to think that it's overpowering your image, you know? I can barely take in the cornstalks without my eye being drawn back to the watermark over and over.

With a watermark that obtrusive, you may win the "Don't steal my image" war, but you'll lose the "Hey, doesn't my image look great?" one.
Maybe something smaller, or just text? Not to really pick here, but I'm having trouble even deciphering what the watermarked image IS. My logical brain is trying to make it into some kind of bear (because of the name), but I just can't see it. Maybe that's partly why I can't reconcile its presence... I can't tell what it is, and yet it's SO noticeable. My advice is to re-think that portion of the design so people CAN recognize your mark, since that's what's important to you.
Cheers!


Gripped 5D Mark III, back-up gripped 5D Mark II, 17-40L, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 85 1.2L, 580EXii, AB1600's, FlexTT1, FlexTT5's,  Mac Pro, a buncha other stuff...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11004
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Feb 16, 2012 22:55 |  #6

This is just not a suitable scene for a photograph, unless you're just doing a camera or lens test. A frontal view of wire fencing, well you'd have to be extremely creative to make anything of that. Based on the subject heading, there are some cornstalks in the photo; presumably they're the inarticulate shapes behind the fencing. They are indiscernable as cornstalks because they're occluded by the wire fencing and snow. The wire fencing, in addition to being bad because it's, well, wire fencing, is out of alignment with the frame, which is also rather jarring to the eyes.

I dislike making a negative critique, but I sincerely hope to help. Stay encouraged and keep shooting and keep posting! :)


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Huntbear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Washington State
     
Feb 17, 2012 10:59 |  #7

Too Distracted, yest it is a bear. Actually it is the tattoo that is on my surgically repaired shoulder to cover the scars. I am working on making it more visible, and smaller....

David, thanks for the information. I am still working on getting my composition right with these kind of shots. That said, I really took the shot to work on my PP with a lot of snow in the picture. That is why I asked if it was blown out. I seem to have issues with things being way out of whack when there is snow in the picture for some reason. I am wondering if I need new glasses.

And you can count on me keeping shooting, and posting.. The only way to get better is to get others input that have more experience than I do. After all, I would not expect you to know how to strip down a 1911 style .45 ACP to pins and springs, but I can do it blindfolded. All it takes is practice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,086 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Cornstalks in snow..
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
572 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.