Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 16 Feb 2012 (Thursday) 19:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

General lens and exposure questions.

 
tawcat
Senior Member
Avatar
433 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Cammack Village, Arkansas
     
Feb 16, 2012 19:41 |  #1

Thinking about buying a Tamron 28-75mm for my walkaround lens, any thoughts?

On the Rebel XS, what exactly is the A-Dep setting used for?

Thanks.


Yes, a picture really is worth a thousand words!
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wuzzittoya
Goldmember
Avatar
2,551 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: rural Missouri
     
Feb 16, 2012 19:44 |  #2

If it is like my T1i manual A-Dep activates autofocus points and then picks the best aperture to have the right depth of field to have everything in your image in focus.


I like to push buttons on thingies that take pictures. Sometimes I like to push other buttons, too.
I only bite on the second Tuesday of every week, usually only mean people - they kinda taste like chicken...
You can call me Wuzzi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
talbot_sunbeam
Senior Member
Avatar
848 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: UK
     
Feb 16, 2012 19:46 |  #3

Did you read the description of this mode in your manual?

Basically, the camera looks at the scene, and attempts to work out what aperture would get all of the objects in frame in focus, and then select that and an appropriate shutter speed.

So if you had a person up close, and a second person in the frame ten feet back, the camera would choose a narrow aperture to give enough depth of field to get both people in focus (if possible).

I find the mode next to useless and have never used it for anything proper. I strongly suggest getting used to Av and M modes, and occasionally Tv mode, before any others...



7D, 450D | 17-55, 10-22, 55-250, 50 1.8, 580EXII | YN568II | YN622 x3 | Magic Lantern | (Still) Jonesing for a 70-200 2.8...
Turns out a gripped 7D + 622 + 580exII + 70-200 2.8 IS MK2 is BLOODY HEAVY! Who knew?!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tawcat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
433 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Cammack Village, Arkansas
     
Feb 16, 2012 23:18 |  #4

talbot_sunbeam wrote in post #13911318 (external link)
Did you read the description of this mode in your manual?

Basically, the camera looks at the scene, and attempts to work out what aperture would get all of the objects in frame in focus, and then select that and an appropriate shutter speed.

So if you had a person up close, and a second person in the frame ten feet back, the camera would choose a narrow aperture to give enough depth of field to get both people in focus (if possible).

I find the mode next to useless and have never used it for anything proper. I strongly suggest getting used to Av and M modes, and occasionally Tv mode, before any others...


Thank you for that. Yes, I have read the manual, however, I don't always understand what is being explained.

Any input on the 28-75 lens? I am using a Tamron 18-250 right now as my everyday lens. Thank you in advance.


Yes, a picture really is worth a thousand words!
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stsva
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,363 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 285
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Feb 17, 2012 08:00 |  #5

tawcat wrote in post #13912471 (external link)
Thank you for that. Yes, I have read the manual, however, I don't always understand what is being explained.

Any input on the 28-75 lens? I am using a Tamron 18-250 right now as my everyday lens. Thank you in advance.

Here are some reviews:
http://www.the-digital-picture.com ….8-XR-Di-Lens-Review.aspx (external link)
http://www.photozone.d​e/Reviews/418-tamron_2875_28_5d (external link)
http://www.bobatkins.c​om …reviews/tamron_​28_75.html (external link)


Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
Member of the GIYF
Club and
HAMSTTR
٩ Breeders Club https://photography-on-the.net …=744235&highlig​ht=hamsttr Join today!
Image Editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wuzzittoya
Goldmember
Avatar
2,551 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: rural Missouri
     
Feb 17, 2012 08:17 |  #6

tawcat wrote in post #13912471 (external link)
Thank you for that. Yes, I have read the manual, however, I don't always understand what is being explained.

Any input on the 28-75 lens? I am using a Tamron 18-250 right now as my everyday lens. Thank you in advance.

What do you shoot most? If that is the most commonly used range of focal lengths, then it would be a good investment. However, if you find you're mostly shooting telephoto, you might be happier with something that is a 70-200. If you find that you're mostly shooting 18-40, you might be happier with something as wide or wider. It isn't really whether or not it is a "good" lens, it's whether or not it is a lens that you will use enough to make the investment you put into it worth it.


I like to push buttons on thingies that take pictures. Sometimes I like to push other buttons, too.
I only bite on the second Tuesday of every week, usually only mean people - they kinda taste like chicken...
You can call me Wuzzi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Feb 17, 2012 08:37 |  #7

[QUOTE=tawcat;13912471​]Thank you for that. Yes, I have read the manual, however, I don't always understand what is being explained./quote]

You've got that right! Everyone always says read the thing but even after reading it several times I'm often still none the wiser.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Feb 17, 2012 08:39 |  #8

The Tammie 28-75 has been my most used lens for the last seven years and three cameras, but if the recently announced Tamron 24-70 VC is as good as the 28-75, it will probably be replaced in about six months.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tawcat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
433 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Cammack Village, Arkansas
     
Feb 17, 2012 08:44 |  #9

Thanks to all that have provided input. I always come away from this forum with a sense of learning. Manuals are great, but they never will replace the word of experience.


Yes, a picture really is worth a thousand words!
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Feb 17, 2012 14:59 |  #10

My Tamron 28-75 is my workhorse lens. I love it. I got a very sharp copy and its an excellent portrait lens.


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tawcat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
433 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Cammack Village, Arkansas
     
Feb 17, 2012 16:09 |  #11

BrickR wrote in post #13916036 (external link)
My Tamron 28-75 is my workhorse lens. I love it. I got a very sharp copy and its an excellent portrait lens.

Thanks. Can you tell me what body you have this on? And what is the exact description of the lens? It appears Tamron offers two different lenses in 28-75. Thanks you again.


Yes, a picture really is worth a thousand words!
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bauerman
discount on value meals
3,457 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Idaho!
     
Feb 17, 2012 16:18 |  #12

My walk-around is a Sigma 24-60mm f/2.8 EX lens that I find to be PERFECT for everyday shooting. I think a constant aperture mid-range zoom is great photographic tool and a good default.

18-250mm lenses sound good on the surface - but what you give up for that range is too great from my perspective. If someone wants a one size fits all lens - why get a DSLR anyway?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_311
Checking squirrels nuts
3,761 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 570
Joined Mar 2011
     
Feb 17, 2012 16:21 |  #13

another lover of the 28-75 here, although you will need to complement it with a wide angle lens, especially on a crop body.


Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
www.michaelalestraphot​ography.com (external link)
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | About me

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tawcat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
433 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Cammack Village, Arkansas
     
Feb 17, 2012 17:16 |  #14

mike_311 wrote in post #13916426 (external link)
another lover of the 28-75 here, although you will need to complement it with a wide angle lens, especially on a crop body.

Thank you, what is the exact description of the lens? It appears Tamron offers two different lenses in 28-75. Thank you again.


Yes, a picture really is worth a thousand words!
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Feb 17, 2012 17:29 |  #15

Tamron SP AF Aspherical XR Di LD (IF) 28 - 75 mm 1:2.8 Macro.

I think they may have gotten drunk on their alphabet soup.

BTW, mine got knocked off a table and fell to the floor last week. Not a mark on it but I immediately did a focus test thinking that the alignment of an element might have changed, but the result I got was the same microadjustment as before, +6.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,794 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
General lens and exposure questions.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1333 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.