Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 16 Feb 2012 (Thursday) 23:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Are wide apertures useless without microadjust?

 
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 20, 2012 19:13 |  #31

dingie256 wrote in post #13931783 (external link)
I also experience focusing issues and am pretty convinced that it needs calibration. Can I ask a silly question? How would I actually go about doing this? For example, where exactly in Canon's website should I begin the process?

There's a 'contact us' clickable link on most professional websites of that kind.


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dan_bgblue
Senior Member
Avatar
632 posts
Joined May 2008
     
Feb 20, 2012 21:00 as a reply to  @ elrey2375's post |  #32

My 40D, no micro adjust, is mounted with the Sigma 30, and the 17-55 as much as any lens in my kit. I have never sent anything in for micro adjust, and the only time I miss focus is because of my user error.

I wish everyone could have the good luck I have had.


Gear list: S5IS, 40D, Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS, Canon 70-200 f4 L IS, Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM, Canon 50mm f1.8 mk1, Canon 85mm f1.8, Sigma 30mm f1.4 EX DC HSM, 430EXII, Kenko 1.4x TC, tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Feb 21, 2012 05:20 |  #33

Are wide apertures useless without microadjust? Yes, this is why no fast lenses were made before 2007 - because it's impossible to take a decent photo at f1.4 without MA.

IMAGE: http://www.frankhollis.com/temp/SarcasmMeter2.gif

Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yogi ­ Bear
Goldmember
1,492 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2009
Location: League City, TX USA (Houston)
     
Feb 21, 2012 08:41 |  #34

dingie256 wrote in post #13931783 (external link)
I also experience focusing issues and am pretty convinced that it needs calibration. Can I ask a silly question? How would I actually go about doing this? For example, where exactly in Canon's website should I begin the process?

If you are in the US, go to this page and select your camera: http://www.usa.canon.c​om …ducts/cameras/s​lr_cameras (external link)

Next, select "Service and Support from the header at the top. Now look under "Service and Repair" and click on the link "Arrange a Repair". The rest is fill in the blank.

Good luck!


Canon EOS 7D | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS |
EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM | 250D | EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | 580 EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brose
Member
Avatar
220 posts
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Tasmania
     
Feb 21, 2012 21:04 |  #35

hollis_f wrote in post #13934651 (external link)
Are wide apertures useless without microadjust? Yes, this is why no fast lenses were made before 2007 - because it's impossible to take a decent photo at f1.4 without MA.

[GIFS ARE NOT RENDERED IN QUOTES]

In the good ole days, photogs didn't expect different from their gear. They had to rise to the challenge their gear and the circumstances presented them. With improvements in technology expectations are different. Requiring input from the photog is more and more regarded as backward and primitive in photographic gear!

This current attitude is related to the expectation that tech improvements are unbounded. In the good ole days photogs knew the laws and therefore the limits of physics/optics/materia​ls/chemicals. Nowadays few photogs know these limits, and the additional laws and limits of electronics, and so have unrealistic expectations of technology and the future of technology. That way deep pits await!

Neil




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,315 views & 0 likes for this thread, 25 members have posted to it.
Are wide apertures useless without microadjust?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2110 guests, 95 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.