sigmapi Cream of the Crop 11,204 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2010 Location: Los Angeles More info | Feb 16, 2012 23:32 | #1 Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tessa Playing with fire 1,705 posts Likes: 59 Joined Sep 2008 More info | Feb 17, 2012 03:29 | #2 The quality of that pic is awful... Pull the lever, Kronk!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" More info | Feb 17, 2012 04:35 | #3 I get the feeling the AP is offering 'credit' for free pictures from fans using an i-phone in the stands. I can't imagine that was the best shot available from an actual working photographer at the game. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
burnet44 Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 17, 2012 07:34 | #4 Tessa wrote in post #13913189 The quality of that pic is awful...
Canon 1DIV, Canon 1DII, 7D2 Canon gripped, 70-200 2.8 ISM II, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Canon 300 2.8, Canon 550 EX flash
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dankopp Member 192 posts Joined Oct 2009 More info | Feb 17, 2012 09:12 | #5 Could that have been a video capture?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
burnet44 Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 17, 2012 09:36 | #6 maybe Canon 1DIV, Canon 1DII, 7D2 Canon gripped, 70-200 2.8 ISM II, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Canon 300 2.8, Canon 550 EX flash
LOG IN TO REPLY |
It would be interesting to find out the rest of the story on this image. You wouldn't believe the number of times that an editor will choose the absolute worst image submitted for use if he feels it fits the story he wants to project. www.zivnuska.zenfolio.com/blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cozmocha Senior Member 728 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Feb 17, 2012 10:10 | #8 Here's what the photo looked like before sportingnews cropped and edited it. My guess is that they resized it and saved it larger then the orignal or something. -Kurt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
burnet44 Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 17, 2012 10:18 | #9 kinda weak for the Houston Cronicle Canon 1DIV, Canon 1DII, 7D2 Canon gripped, 70-200 2.8 ISM II, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Canon 300 2.8, Canon 550 EX flash
LOG IN TO REPLY |
clarence Goldmember 2,204 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2008 Location: Northern VA More info | Feb 17, 2012 11:47 | #10 Cozmocha wrote in post #13914472 Here's what the photo looked like before sportingnews cropped and edited it. My guess is that they resized it and saved it larger then the orignal or something. http://www.chron.com …izards-106-89-3257320.php The crop and resize definitely didn't help. For Sale: 1D, T1i, 800mm, 600mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sigmapi THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 11,204 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2010 Location: Los Angeles More info | Feb 17, 2012 12:00 | #11 Zivnuska wrote in post #13914301 It would be interesting to find out the rest of the story on this image. You wouldn't believe the number of times that an editor will choose the absolute worst It was embarrassing. Go figure. Phil Yeah it would be interesting to know what happened. Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 17, 2012 21:57 | #12 Zivnuska wrote in post #13914301 It would be interesting to find out the rest of the story on this image. You wouldn't believe the number of times that an editor will choose the absolute worst image submitted for use if he feels it fits the story he wants to project. The worst image I've ever had published ended up on the cover of a monthly magazine that covers high school sports. I was assigned to shoot bowling (worst lighting ever), shot plenty of reasonable shots, but the tourney organizers refused to tell my editor who the leaders were. I was shooting bowlers based on reputation but the editor ending up choosing a very weak image of a particular young lady who ended up with the best score from her school. It was embarrassing. Go figure. Phil Ha! I got asked to do this for this season. All you "What to do in a dark gym?" guys need to quit complaining about light. Try shooting in a bowling alley with dark walls, smoky grunge ceiling, scattered light fixtures with mix and match bulbs and....oh yeah, no flash allowed. And the hand moves almost as fast as volleyball. Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JersFocus Senior Member 572 posts Joined Dec 2011 Location: Same pale blue dot as you. More info | Feb 18, 2012 04:25 | #13 |
burnet44 Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 18, 2012 08:43 | #14 Tim S wrote in post #13917843 Ha! I got asked to do this for this season. All you "What to do in a dark gym?" guys need to quit complaining about light. Try shooting in a bowling alley with dark walls, smoky grunge ceiling, scattered light fixtures with mix and match bulbs and....oh yeah, no flash allowed. And the hand moves almost as fast as volleyball. oh no problem lol Canon 1DIV, Canon 1DII, 7D2 Canon gripped, 70-200 2.8 ISM II, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Canon 300 2.8, Canon 550 EX flash
LOG IN TO REPLY |
primoz POTN Sports Photographer of the year 2005 2,532 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2004 Location: Anywhere where ski World cup makes its stop More info | Feb 18, 2012 11:23 | #15 As far as I know how AP operates in USA, it's not directly "shooting for AP". On this side of ocean (Europe) AP is just a regular photo/press agency, and they have their own shooters or stringers. On US side, things are different. They have "pool" of local shooters, who are shooting for their local newspapers, and these newspapers have deal with AP, so AP is forwarding their photos. So even if byline says AP, it doesn't mean AP shooter/stringer took that photo. It can be, but it can be also some kid shooting for local newspaper. PhotoSI
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1685 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||