Quest question

I'm using a tamron 28-75 2.8 and I love this lens. It takes great pictures etc, but i'm thinking about getting a canon 24-70 2.8

Should I keep my tamron and just buy a 70-200 2.8 IS II
or sell the tamron and get the canon 24-70 2.8, 50 1.4 and 85 1.8? Thanks in advance. Btw I will have all of those lenses by the end of the year, but I was trying to just buy the more expensive one first.

I don't think there's a right or wrong answer to your qestion....

What do you think the 24-70 will give you over the 28-75?

I think getting the 70-200II first makes more sense.

kin2son wrote in post #13927671
I don't think there's a right or wrong answer to your qestion....

What do you think the 24-70 will give you over the 28-75?

I think getting the 70-200II first makes more sense.

Is the Tamron letting you down somewhere along the line? You need to decide what will benefit you the most from your options.

Thanks guys! I just wanted the L lens, but I will go with the 70-200 first.

I've had the Tamron for several years, and once borrowed a 24-70 to see if it would be worth "upgrading". Focusing speed was better on the 24-70, but generally speaking the images from the two lenses were equally good. And the 24-70 is a large beast; I didn't enjoy carrying it around. I've always liked my Tamron, and the experience with the 24-70 solidified that. I kept my lens and haven't ever considered upgrading it since.

In your shoes I'd go for the 70-200 instead.