This is a fairly new school with a really nice gym, but the lighting is ok, plus there were a bank of them blown out. I should've stayed at ISO 8000, but I did some experimenting.
Methodical Cream of the Crop 7,894 posts Gallery: 239 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 3668 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Where ever I lay my hat is my home More info | Feb 21, 2012 23:28 | #1 This is a fairly new school with a really nice gym, but the lighting is ok, plus there were a bank of them blown out. I should've stayed at ISO 8000, but I did some experimenting. Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sempaidavid Senior Member 890 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Fresno CA More info | Feb 21, 2012 23:33 | #2 Very nice. I too have been using iso 6400 with great results. It's pretty amazing when you think about it. I wonder how good the IdX is really going to be by comparison. It's hard to imagine it getting much better, but history has shown that it will. 5D mkIII, 1D mkIV, Tokina 16-28 f/2.8, EF 24-70L, EF 70-200 f/2.8L II IS, EF 100-400L, EF 85 f/1.8, Sigma 50 f/1.4, EF 24-105
LOG IN TO REPLY |
seaninsa Goldmember 1,622 posts Likes: 331 Joined Sep 2011 More info | Feb 22, 2012 00:05 | #3 Those pictures are awesome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thedcmule2 Goldmember 1,125 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2011 More info | Feb 22, 2012 00:05 | #4 What camera/lens was this? And what post processing did you use? This doesnt look like SOOC ISO 6400..not on my 60D anyways lol.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tessa Playing with fire 1,705 posts Likes: 59 Joined Sep 2008 More info | From exif it looks like these were taken with 1D4 and (I'm guessing) 24-70 f/2.8. They look really good, very nice work Pull the lever, Kronk!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thedcmule2 Goldmember 1,125 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2011 More info | Feb 22, 2012 00:57 | #6 Ah...1D4, no wonder.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
groovehouse Senior Member 287 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Houston, TX More info | Feb 22, 2012 08:06 | #7 In some of those shots you are at 1/500th, with those photos still just a tiny touch overexposed, you can crank that sucker to 1/800th or 1/1000th and probably get a sharper shot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TooManyShots Cream of the Crop 10,203 posts Likes: 532 Joined Jan 2008 Location: NYC More info | Feb 22, 2012 10:39 | #8 Permanent banYeah, if you are shooting with a 1dmark4... One Imaging Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Methodical THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 7,894 posts Gallery: 239 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 3668 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Where ever I lay my hat is my home More info | Feb 22, 2012 11:18 | #9 Thanks. I used the 70-200 2.8II lens for those shots. The 24-70 would be really nice down under the basket, but unless I find a cheap one, the 70-200 will have to do. Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
habenero Member 234 posts Likes: 5 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Dallas More info | Feb 23, 2012 07:17 | #10 Great shots! Randy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PixelMagic Cream of the Crop 5,546 posts Likes: 6 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Racine, WI More info | Feb 23, 2012 09:19 | #11 I'm not afraid either...I regularly shoot at ISO 6400 with a 1D Mark III. This was shot in a dark gym and with some slight tweaking yielded a great print.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PCBlueHose43 Hatchling 1 post Joined Apr 2008 More info | Feb 23, 2012 14:21 | #12 Great shots Al, what noise reduction software are you using?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
8612images Senior Member 740 posts Likes: 91 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Texas More info | Feb 23, 2012 16:30 | #13 That Mk IV is what I want! Nice series. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBrick3 Goldmember 2,094 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: College Park, Md. More info | I use my 1D III at 6400 ISO frequently with acceptable results. I use 6400 ISO on my 5D II without thinking twice about it. 1D III 5D II 5D | 580 EX II x 2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gromeo Senior Member 981 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 Location: Orlando, FL More info | Feb 23, 2012 17:04 | #15 Methodical wrote in post #13943701 Thanks. I used the 70-200 2.8II lens for those shots. The 24-70 would be really nice down under the basket, but unless I find a cheap one, the 70-200 will have to do. Groovehouse, when I use 800, it seems a bit underexposed. This was my 1st time at this gym and depending on which end of the court, because some lights were out, things got a bit tricky. SS 500 is the lowest I would go, but even there sometimes the ball is blury. I may go with SS 640 next time. Or I can go upto ISO 8000 - not sure. Again thanks all Nice captures. Is this a HS gym? 640 @ iso 8000 that seems to be a really dark gym. Nikon D4 and 60 2.8D Micro, 24-70 2.8G, 70-200 2.8G VRII, 200-400 VRII, SB800, SB600, Pocket Wizards, 4x WL-1600, Quantum Turbo 2x2, Sekonic 358 meter, TT AS, Takeoff, Belt System
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1798 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||