I just looked for the first time what lenses NIKON has to offer. I see a MF 1.2 50 but not AF? Is that true? How can that be?
pixel_junkie Goldmember 2,013 posts Likes: 143 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern California More info | Feb 22, 2012 18:45 | #1 |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" More info | Feb 22, 2012 18:48 | #2 Do you really think the 1/3 stop from f/1.4 to f/1.2 is a big deal? Nikon doesn't. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixel_junkie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,013 posts Likes: 143 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern California More info |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" More info | Feb 22, 2012 18:54 | #4 pixel_junkie wrote in post #13946688 If you put it that way, no. But still, 1.2 is 1.2 and it is very much usable and fantastic. I didn't buy the 50L for the 1.2 either but I do use it and love it. Sure, it is usable. But realistically the difference between a shot at f/1.2 and f/1.4 is.....well.....it's 1/3 stop which doesn't make a hell of a difference either way. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixel_junkie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,013 posts Likes: 143 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern California More info | Feb 22, 2012 18:55 | #5 JeffreyG wrote in post #13946706 Sure, it is usable. But realistically the difference between a shot at f/1.2 and f/1.4 is.....well.....it's 1/3 stop which doesn't make a hell of a difference either way. Take a shot at f/1.2 and then f/1.4. There ain't much difference. Exactly, but my shutter breathes better at 1.2 sometimes (slightly)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Feb 22, 2012 18:56 | #6 I have the 85 L and rarely ever use 1.2. Who really wants to see one eye in focus?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixel_junkie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,013 posts Likes: 143 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern California More info |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" More info | Feb 22, 2012 19:11 | #8 pixel_junkie wrote in post #13946725 1.2 can but used for more than just a close up portrait, no? Sure. But I still say a third of a stop is just not much of a big deal, especially when we are talking about a lens this fast to start with. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixel_junkie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,013 posts Likes: 143 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern California More info | I hear you. I still like having 1.2 and I use it plenty. I was just surprised to see that NIKON has not put together an answer to CANONs ultra fast challenge. How often it is useful is besides the point. I can imagine, the way "f/1.2" can sound to some. From marketing stand point, it has to be huge. And on top of that, it is not just a gimmick, it's usable in more than one situation.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Feb 22, 2012 19:42 | #10 pixel_junkie wrote in post #13946725 1.2 can but used for more than just a close up portrait, no? What Jeffrey said.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Invertalon Cream of the Crop 6,495 posts Likes: 24 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Cleveland, OH More info | Feb 22, 2012 19:44 | #11 When I had the 85L, I used it wide open 90% of the time. I loved it. But stopped down a fast lens just becomes insanely sharp. Another great benefit.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jffielde Member 195 posts Joined Nov 2010 More info | Feb 22, 2012 20:00 | #12 Well, 1.2 is better than 1.4 if you can pull it off well enough. If Nikon could do it without compromising something else people would care about more, they'd be foolish not to. I guess Canon has found a way to strike that balance and Nikon has not.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
if f1.2 is the same as f1.4 then f1.4 is the same as 1.8 and 1.2 is the same as 1.8. Edward Jenner
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Alex_Venom Goldmember 1,624 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 More info | Feb 22, 2012 20:18 | #14 F/1.2 is for marketing purposes IMHO. Photography is about GEAR and not talent or practice. Practice won't make you a better photographer. Expensive equipment will. =D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
marcosv Senior Member 775 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: San Jose, CA More info | Feb 23, 2012 15:04 | #15 Can anyone comment on the quality of the 85L shot at f/1.4 vs. Nikon's 85mm at f/1.4? EOS-M | 40D | 5DII | 5DIII | EF-M 22 | EF-M 18-55 | 10-22 | 17-55 | 17-40L | 24-70L mk II | 24-105L | 70-200/2.8L IS mk II| 35L | 85L II |35/2 | 40/2.8 pancake | 50/1.8 | 50/1.4 | 100/2 | Rokinon 14/2.8 | 90 EX | 270 EX II | 580 EXII | 600 EX-RT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 653 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||