Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 26 Feb 2012 (Sunday) 19:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ECU v. UMD Baseball (Feb. 26 2012)

 
Phased
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
180 posts
Likes: 35
Joined May 2010
Location: Charlotte
     
Feb 28, 2012 21:54 |  #16

What would you recommend say with normal lighting on a mostly clear day like that one?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 28, 2012 22:12 |  #17

Phased wrote in post #13987686 (external link)
What would you recommend say with normal lighting on a mostly clear day like that one?

that's the beauty of it: what shutter speed do you want? Keep going until you get it. It's all about tweaking it until you find the sweet spot.


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phased
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
180 posts
Likes: 35
Joined May 2010
Location: Charlotte
     
Feb 28, 2012 22:16 |  #18

Yeah I agree with the sweet spot thing that's what I was trying to figure out that day. But for example if I want to stop the ball and bat in a swing what would be the optimum shutter speed for that?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 28, 2012 22:29 |  #19

Phased wrote in post #13987826 (external link)
Yeah I agree with the sweet spot thing that's what I was trying to figure out that day. But for example if I want to stop the ball and bat in a swing what would be the optimum shutter speed for that?

In my experience, to freeze a ball perfectly it's going to take north of 1/2500 at the very least, probably higher.


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 28, 2012 22:38 |  #20

for a frame of reference, this is 1/4000 and the ball isn't frozen

2096
x
2280
TOO LARGE!
EMBED PREVENTED, IMAGE TOO LARGE:
http://img822.imagesha​ck.us/img822/1889/imgl​8633.jpg
Click here to see our image rules.

http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phased
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
180 posts
Likes: 35
Joined May 2010
Location: Charlotte
     
Feb 28, 2012 22:40 |  #21

Gotcha, what was your ISO at for that image?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 28, 2012 22:55 |  #22

Phased wrote in post #13987942 (external link)
Gotcha, what was your ISO at for that image?

On my 1D Mark III it was at 400 with aperture wide open at 2.8. Even with 2.8, it might be a little higher ISO on your camera because of the difference in sensor size.


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phased
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
180 posts
Likes: 35
Joined May 2010
Location: Charlotte
     
Feb 28, 2012 23:00 |  #23

Yeah probably a bit, I'm shooting with a 70-200 F/4L




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 28, 2012 23:02 |  #24

Phased wrote in post #13988042 (external link)
Yeah probably a bit, I'm shooting with a 70-200 F/4L

Yeah, so a stop slower and smaller sensor, you're probably going to be up above 1000 I'm guessing. But don't be afraid because a properly exposed photo will clean up better too.


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phased
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
180 posts
Likes: 35
Joined May 2010
Location: Charlotte
     
Feb 28, 2012 23:05 |  #25

Alright, I'll keep that in mind next time; thanks a lot for the tips.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phased
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
180 posts
Likes: 35
Joined May 2010
Location: Charlotte
     
Feb 28, 2012 23:09 |  #26

Few more

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7209/6787333704_acc32f3a26_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …ichaelseegars/6​787333704/  (external link)
IMG_0819 (external link) by Mike-Seegars (external link), on Flickr
IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7037/6940470625_980a18440d_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …ichaelseegars/6​940470625/  (external link)
IMG_0948 (external link) by Mike-Seegars (external link), on Flickr
IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7207/6787362728_3f3d546cde_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …ichaelseegars/6​787362728/  (external link)
IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7181/6794339798_2e5fb1c29a_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …ichaelseegars/6​794339798/  (external link)
IMG_0839 (external link) by Mike-Seegars (external link), on Flickr
IMG_0891 (external link) by Mike-Seegars (external link), on Flickr
IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7204/6794339264_624faf4d90_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …ichaelseegars/6​794339264/  (external link)
IMG_0770 (external link) by Mike-Seegars (external link), on Flickr



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 29, 2012 00:34 |  #27

The pitcher, the third one is good. On the other two there are focus issues. In the first one, his face is just not in focus and on the third one, the catcher is sharp but the batter's face is not. Just keep going at it man, it takes practice. Guys who are doing this thing at the highest level don't get every shot. The only thing you can do is be prepared and be present. I know that some of the nitpicks might seem small but if you are thinking about doing this for a living, and I don't know that you are, you're going to have to hold yourself to a high standard because the competition is stiff at every level of this game. You have to be as constructively critical about your own stuff as anyone else is.


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phased
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
180 posts
Likes: 35
Joined May 2010
Location: Charlotte
     
Feb 29, 2012 00:56 |  #28

I really appreciate your tips, they help a lot. With those two after looking back over the thread I didn't even catch it at first on my flickr just b/c I didn't view them as large yet I definitely see the focus issues there.
I'm going to put a couple in their place.
And thanks again, I definitely appreciate and understand your words.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 29, 2012 02:35 |  #29

Phased wrote in post #13988407 (external link)
I really appreciate your tips, they help a lot. With those two after looking back over the thread I didn't even catch it at first on my flickr just b/c I didn't view them as large yet I definitely see the focus issues there.
I'm going to put a couple in their place.
And thanks again, I definitely appreciate and understand your words.

I'm really glad you're taking the advice in the spirit it's being given. A lot of people get upset or think it's a personal thing when you start critiquing someone's photos but it's not a personal thing. In fact, I think most of the time you get a better critique than you might from someone who knows you. The new ones you put up are much better. The only critique I would have is the baserunner. Just not enough face showing and the angle is just not right to get that shot. It brings up a good lesson though. You won't always be in the right place to get THE shot of a certain situation. It helps if you know the sport and can put yourself in good positions but a lot of the time it comes down to luck. Guys don't like to admit that but in sports photography, it's definitely true. You are either in the right spot to get the shot or you aren't. If you just want a baserunner shot, a player who is running to first makes for an easy target.

Sometimes, like in this shot, the guy hit it in the gap so he's pushing for second right out of the gate and you have a chance to get some good expressions. It's a touch underexposed on his face but that can be fixed if I was going to use it. I hate late afternoon games btw LOL.

2431
x
2321
TOO LARGE!
EMBED PREVENTED, IMAGE TOO LARGE:
http://img820.imagesha​ck.us/img820/5255/imgl​9235.jpg
Click here to see our image rules.


When I looked at this one on the back of the camera, I thought I missed the toss. It wasn't until I got back to my laptop that I saw I actually caught it but the guy's sleeve almost acts like camouflage for the ball. Sometimes you get lucky, sometimes you don't. The second baseman's uniform is also a bit blown out but again, that's fixable in post if I'm going to use it. Both of these are straight out of the camera and are an example of why I hate shadows on the field because the first shot was in shadow and then you have to whip around and get the next shot but it's in the sunlight.

2166
x
1806
TOO LARGE!
EMBED PREVENTED, IMAGE TOO LARGE:
http://img194.imagesha​ck.us/img194/6563/imgl​9149.jpg
Click here to see our image rules.

http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arich
Senior Member
Avatar
401 posts
Joined Dec 2011
     
Feb 29, 2012 04:51 |  #30

If its a bright sunny day, why are you boosting your ISO so high and overexposing your shot? The 1/4000 shutter speed serves no purpose. You don't need over 1/1000 to nail your shot and 1/800 works just as well. It would be much better to keep your ISO down and have a cleaner image than push it for no reason for the sake of an unnecessary shutter speed


http://andrew-richardson.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,288 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
ECU v. UMD Baseball (Feb. 26 2012)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1220 guests, 165 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.