http://image-sensors-world.blogspot.com …features-41mp-sensor.html
DarthVader There is no such thing as Title Fairy ever  6,513 posts Likes: 42 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Death Star More info | Feb 27, 2012 05:30 | #1 Nikon/Fuji.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ricku Goldmember  1,295 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Bangkok More info | Feb 27, 2012 05:34 | #2  Permanent banWhat the?? 5D II • 35L • 135L • 70-200 2.8L II •Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 27, 2012 05:35 | #3 Interesting. Wonder how much it'll cost. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cromfel Member 46 posts Joined Feb 2009 More info | "People will inevitably home in on the number of pixels the Nokia 808 PureView packs, but they’re missing the point. The ‘big deal’ is how they’re used. At Nokia, our focus has always been capability and performance. The main way to build smaller cameras over the years has been to reduce the pixel size. These have shrunk just over the past 6 years from 2.2 microns, to 1.75 microns, to 1.4 microns (which is where most compact digital cameras and smartphones are today). Some new products are on the way with 1.1 micron pixels. But here’s the problem. The smaller the pixel, the less photons each pixel is able to collect. Less photons, less image quality. There’s also more visual noise in images/videos, and various other knock on effects. In our experience, when new, smaller pixel size sensors are first released, they tend to be worse than the previous generation. While others jump in, banking on pixel numbers instead of performance, we prefer to skip early iterations." I like the essence of this comment. its not just for the pixel whores... They actually have some kind of vision behind. And frankly speaking, I like it. Even if I have always started feeling sorry for Nokia to always focus on HW while their SW side has been declining, this time Im genuinely impressed. I see use for this device and I hope to see it adopted for Point and Shoot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MOkoFOko nut impotent and avoiding Geoff  19,889 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Michigan More info | Feb 27, 2012 08:05 | #5 Sirrith wrote in post #13974714 Interesting. Wonder how much it'll cost. Saw this on Yahoo. According to them, it will cost $450.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
djentley Senior Member 386 posts Joined Sep 2010 More info | Feb 27, 2012 08:10 | #6 Does this make it a direct competitor to the D800...? My 500px.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 27, 2012 08:24 | #7 MOkoFOko wrote in post #13975158 Saw this on Yahoo. According to them, it will cost $450. http://news.yahoo.com …xel-camera-032654798.html In that case I might actually pick one up just for fun when my current phone dies -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gryphes Senior Member  335 posts Joined Nov 2011 Location: The Netherlands More info | Feb 27, 2012 08:30 | #8 I think i'll stick to my 5D II haha flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 27, 2012 09:31 | #9 when you start mailing photos taken with that thing from the phone, pay attention to your data plan restrictions. wonder how it handles noise? pixel size 1.4um...the D800 has 4.9um
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DarthVader THREAD STARTER There is no such thing as Title Fairy ever 6,513 posts Likes: 42 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Death Star More info | Feb 27, 2012 09:49 | #10 How much is it without the phone ? $100 ? MOkoFOko wrote in post #13975158 Saw this on Yahoo. According to them, it will cost $450. http://news.yahoo.com …xel-camera-032654798.html Nikon/Fuji.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AngryCorgi -Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion  11,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA... More info | Feb 27, 2012 09:50 | #11 Gryphes wrote in post #13975265 I think i'll stick to my 5D II haha I bet the Nokia handles shadow noise better. AngryCorgi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!"  More info | http://www.engadget.com …le-shots-feast-your-eyes/ Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KCY Unlocked the hidden 117 point AF  7,170 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2009 Location: I wish I knew... More info | Feb 27, 2012 10:02 | #13 if the stitched them together to cover a F sensor how many MegaPickle would that be? KC - The Circle of PoTN - Member of the UCPC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bkdc Senior Member  888 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2007 Location: NoVA More info | Does anyone think 41 megapixels on that tiny thing will give any better quality pictures than 12 megapixels? RF 24-70 f/4L IS | RF 24-70 f/2.8L IS | RF 70-200 f/2.8L IS | RF 50L | RF 85L | 600EX-RT x 3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AngryCorgi -Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion 11,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA... More info | Feb 27, 2012 10:06 | #15 KCY wrote in post #13975798 if the stitched them together to cover a F sensor how many MegaPickle would that be? Over 440MP if scaled up to FF. AngryCorgi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1113 guests, 169 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
