Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 27 Feb 2012 (Monday) 08:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How do I deal with this situation?

 
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Feb 27, 2012 20:22 |  #16

I've never used the GE tool on LR2; I wonder if it exists on that version (the version I have). Whenever I use the Adjustment Brush tool in Lightroom the edges don't look good, no matter how hard or soft my brush is, nor how much opacity I use I can always see spots in the edges. Love to have a Graduated Exposure tool to use when I have to.


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NavyShrink
Senior Member
Avatar
259 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Yomitan-son, Okinawa, Japan
     
Feb 28, 2012 04:49 as a reply to  @ post 13978957 |  #17

I just did two graduated filters. The first filter I dragged over the first two on the left (increased exposure) which exposed her about right, but still left him dark, so I did another filter (increasing exposure again) just over him. I found that I had to drop saturation on the filter a tad. I also bumped up "recovery" a tad, and also "fill light" a little bit.

You're only way around this, in camera, I supposed would have been to reposition them in the available light you had, or overpowered ambient light with flash and shutter speed (i.e. to heck with uncooperative available light, and create your own dang light!)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


5DII x2 | 7D | 17-40L | 35L | Σ 50 | 85L | 135L | 70-200L IS II | Fuji X100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mckinleypics
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,809 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
     
Feb 28, 2012 07:35 |  #18

Thanks Doc. I downloaded the LR3 trial and it does seem to help over Aperture. It is half price now so I may go ahead and get it.

I hear you on the light. This was a bit of an awkward situation because there were about 8 other people facing them taking pictures so I couldn't interrupt everything and move them around to cater to me. In fact, there are only a couple of shots where all four people are looking at the same camera!


Dave
7D, 70-200mm 2.8 L IS, 24-70mm 2.8 L, 50mm 1.4, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, 580EXII
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Feb 28, 2012 10:02 |  #19

mckinleypics wrote in post #13982193 (external link)
Thanks Doc. I downloaded the LR3 trial and it does seem to help over Aperture. It is half price now so I may go ahead and get it.

I hear you on the light. This was a bit of an awkward situation because there were about 8 other people facing them taking pictures so I couldn't interrupt everything and move them around to cater to me. In fact, there are only a couple of shots where all four people are looking at the same camera!

It is tough if 1000 others are taking shots and everybody is than looking in different direction.


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
john5189
Senior Member
598 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2008
     
Feb 29, 2012 11:54 |  #20

mckinleypics wrote in post #13982193 (external link)
I hear you on the light. This was a bit of an awkward situation because there were about 8 other people facing them taking pictures so I couldn't interrupt everything and move them around to cater to me. In fact, there are only a couple of shots where all four people are looking at the same camera!

If you had no control over the situation then what you got is as good as you might get.

At the time you may have been able to use remote flash held by a friend, but then again would you have time to set it all up.

On camera flash might have helped by bouncing the flash of the ceilling behind you and letting the camera do the calcs, check the histogram and adjust flash compensation if nessecary. You want the flash to light the ceilling as bright as poss to evenly light the scene.


Wedding Photography in Herefordshire.  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mckinleypics
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,809 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
     
Feb 29, 2012 13:37 |  #21

john5189 wrote in post #13990728 (external link)
If you had no control over the situation then what you got is as good as you might get.

At the time you may have been able to use remote flash held by a friend, but then again would you have time to set it all up.

On camera flash might have helped by bouncing the flash of the ceilling behind you and letting the camera do the calcs, check the histogram and adjust flash compensation if nessecary. You want the flash to light the ceilling as bright as poss to evenly light the scene.

Thanks John. I guess that's what I was looking for. Confirmation that I was in a tough situation and didn't pull a gomer mistake that would have fixed everything. I find exposure nuances the trickiest to spot while taking the shots because you really have to be looking for them. As you know, the human eye has incredible dynamic range so spotting differences in lighting across a scene is tough if you aren't really dialed into it. You get home and look at the shots and think, hmm, don't remember this guy standing in a shadow...


Dave
7D, 70-200mm 2.8 L IS, 24-70mm 2.8 L, 50mm 1.4, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, 580EXII
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,248 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
How do I deal with this situation?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
559 guests, 153 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.