rjx Goldmember 2,670 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Santa Clara, California More info | Mar 02, 2012 21:23 | #1 "It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
match14 Senior Member 362 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2009 Location: United Kingdom More info | Mar 03, 2012 05:08 | #2 |
drecomfr Mostly Lurking 17 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Mar 03, 2012 23:49 | #3 From the RAW samples, D4 appears to be somewhere in between 1-2 stop improvement over the 5D II. I'd wager 1.5 stop. The 1D X just might be able to take the ISO crown this time around! flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
woos Goldmember 2,224 posts Likes: 24 Joined Dec 2008 Location: a giant bucket More info | Mar 04, 2012 01:47 | #4 Supposedly the D4 has lower than expected read noise at base ISO, though, giving almost an extra stop over the d3s in dynamic range--not as good as the d7000, but still very good improvement, given it is using (as far as I know) the same type of design as Canon, ie, the chip outputs an analog signal. amanathia.zenfolio.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1457 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||